SWAT: MODEL USE, CALIBRATION, AND VALIDATION

被引:10
|
作者
Arnold, J. G. [1 ]
Moriasi, D. N. [2 ]
Gassman, P. W. [3 ]
Abbaspour, K. C. [4 ]
White, M. J. [1 ]
Srinivasan, R. [5 ]
Santhi, C. [6 ]
Harmel, R. D. [1 ]
van Griensven, A. [7 ]
Van Liew, M. W. [8 ]
Kannan, N. [6 ]
Jha, M. K. [9 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Grassland Soil & Water Res Lab, Temple, TX 76502 USA
[2] USDA ARS, Great Plains Agroclimate & Nat Resources Res Unit, El Reno, OK USA
[3] Iowa State Univ, Ctr Agr & Rural Dev, Ames, IA USA
[4] Swiss Fed Inst Aquat Sci & Technol, Dubendorf, Switzerland
[5] Texas A&M Univ, Spatial Sci Lab, College Stn, TX USA
[6] Texas Res & Extens Ctr, Temple, TX USA
[7] UNESCO IHE, Inst Water Educ, Delft, Netherlands
[8] Univ Nebraska, Dept Biol Syst Engn, Lincoln, NE USA
[9] N Carolina A&T, Coll Engn, Greensboro, NC USA
关键词
Autocalibration; Hydrologic model; SWAT; Validation; WATER ASSESSMENT-TOOL; NONPOINT-SOURCE POLLUTION; THUKELA RIVER-BASIN; LAND-USE CHANGE; QUALITY MODEL; AUTOMATIC CALIBRATION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; CROP YIELD; MULTISITE CALIBRATION; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) is a comprehensive, semi-distributed river basin model that requires a large number of input parameters, which complicates model parameterization and calibration. Several calibration techniques have been developed for SWAT, including manual calibration procedures and automated procedures using the shuffled complex evolution method and other common methods. In addition, SWAT-CUP was recently developed and provides a decision-making framework that incorporates a semi-automated approach (SUF12) using both manual and automated calibration and incorporating sensitivity and uncertainty analysis. In SWAT-CUP, users can manually adjust parameters and ranges iteratively between autocalibration runs. Parameter sensitivity analysis helps focus the calibration and uncertainty analysis and is used to provide statistics for goodness-of-fit. The user interaction or manual component of the SWAT-CUP calibration forces the user to obtain a better understanding of the overall hydrologic processes (e.g., baseflow ratios, ET, sediment sources and sinks, crop yields, and nutrient balances) and of parameter sensitivity. It is important for future calibration developments to spatially account for hydrologic processes; improve model run time efficiency; include the impact of uncertainty in the conceptual model, model parameters, and measured variables used in calibration; and assist users in checking for model errors. When calibrating a physically based model like SWAT, it is important to remember that all model input parameters must be kept within a realistic uncertainty range and that no automatic procedure can substitute for actual physical knowledge of the watershed.
引用
收藏
页码:1491 / 1508
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION OF THE SWAT HYDROLOGICAL MODEL FOR THE MUCURI RIVER BASIN
    Almeida, Rafael A.
    Pereira, Silvio B.
    Pinto, Daniel B. F.
    [J]. ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA, 2018, 38 (01): : 55 - 63
  • [2] Calibration, validation and uncertainty analysis of a SWAT water quality model
    Das, Sushil K.
    Ahsan, Amimul
    Khan, Md. Habibur Rahman Bejoy
    Yilmaz, Abdullah Gokhan
    Ahmed, Shakil
    Imteaz, Monzur
    Tariq, Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman
    Shafiquzzaman, Md.
    Ng, Anne W. M.
    Al-Ansari, Nadhir
    [J]. APPLIED WATER SCIENCE, 2024, 14 (04)
  • [3] Calibration and Validation of the SWAT Hydrological Model for the Air Dingin Watershed
    Arlius, F.
    Berd, I
    Setyawan, F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF SUSTAINABILITY AGRICULTURE AND BIOSYSTEM, 2020, 515
  • [4] Calibration, validation and uncertainty analysis of a SWAT water quality model
    Sushil K. Das
    Amimul Ahsan
    Md. Habibur Rahman Bejoy Khan
    Abdullah Gokhan Yilmaz
    Shakil Ahmed
    Monzur Imteaz
    Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman Tariq
    Md. Shafiquzzaman
    Anne W. M. Ng
    Nadhir Al-Ansari
    [J]. Applied Water Science, 2024, 14
  • [5] SWAT application in intensive irrigation systems: Model modification, calibration and validation
    Dechmi, Farida
    Burguete, Javier
    Skhiri, Ahmed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2012, 470 : 227 - 238
  • [6] ADAPT: MODEL USE, CALIBRATION, AND VALIDATION
    Gowda, P. H.
    Mulla, D. J.
    Desmond, E. D.
    Ward, A. D.
    Moriasi, D. N.
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2012, 55 (04) : 1345 - 1352
  • [7] WEPP: MODEL USE, CALIBRATION, AND VALIDATION
    Flanagan, D. C.
    Frankenberger, J. R.
    Ascough, J. C., II
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2012, 55 (04) : 1463 - 1477
  • [8] STANMOD: MODEL USE, CALIBRATION, AND VALIDATION
    van Genuchten, M. Th.
    Simunek, J.
    Leij, F. J.
    Toride, N.
    Sejna, M.
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2012, 55 (04) : 1353 - 1366
  • [9] DRAINMOD: MODEL USE, CALIBRATION, AND VALIDATION
    Skaggs, R. W.
    Youssef, M. A.
    Chescheir, G. M.
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2012, 55 (04) : 1509 - 1522
  • [10] HYDRUS: MODEL USE, CALIBRATION, AND VALIDATION
    Simunek, J.
    van Genuchten, M. Th.
    Sejna, M.
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2012, 55 (04) : 1261 - 1274