MAXIMAL STRENGTH, NUMBER OF REPETITIONS, AND TOTAL VOLUME ARE DIFFERENTLY AFFECTED BY STATIC-, BALLISTIC-, AND PROPRIOCEPTIVE NEUROMUSCULAR FACILITATION STRETCHING

被引:35
|
作者
Barroso, Renato [1 ,2 ]
Tricoli, Valmor [1 ]
Gil, Saulo dos Santos [1 ]
Ugrinowitsch, Carlos [1 ]
Roschel, Hamilton [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Lab Neuromuscular Adaptat Strength Training, Sch Phys Educ & Sport, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Ribeirao Preto UNAERP, Dept Phys Educ, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
training; skeletal muscle; range of motion; MUSCLE STRENGTH; PASSIVE STRETCH; MULTIPLE SETS; PEAK TORQUE; EXERCISE; SINGLE; RESISTANCE; POWER; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; MECHANOMYOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1519/JSC.0b013e31823f2b4d
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Barroso, R, Tricoli, V, dos Santos Gil, S, Ugrinowitsch, C, and Roschel, H. Maximal strength, number of repetitions, and total volume are differently affected by static-, ballistic-, and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching. J Strength Cond Res 26(9): 2432-2437, 2012-Stretching exercises have been traditionally incorporated into warm-up routines before training sessions and sport events. However, the effects of stretching on maximal strength and strength endurance performance seem to depend on the type of stretching employed. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of static stretching (SS), ballistic stretching (BS), and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching on maximal strength, number of repetitions at a submaximal load, and total volume (i.e., number of repetitions 3 external load) in a multiple-set resistance training bout. Twelve strength-trained men (20.4 +/- 4.5 years, 67.9 +/- 6.3 kg, 173.3 +/- 8.5 cm) volunteered to participate in this study. All of the subjects completed 8 experimental sessions. Four experimental sessions were designed to test maximal strength in the leg press (i.e., 1 repetition maximum [1RM]) after each stretching condition (SS, BS, PNF, or no-stretching [NS]). During the other 4 sessions, the number of repetitions performed at 80% 1RM was assessed after each stretching condition. All of the stretching protocols significantly improved the range of motion in the sit-and-reach test when compared with NS. Further, PNF induced greater changes in the sit-and-reach test than BS did (4.7 +/- 1.6, 2.9 +/- 1.5, and 1.9 +/- 1.4 cm for PNF, SS, and BS, respectively). Leg press 1RM values were decreased only after the PNF condition (5.5%, p < 0.001). All the stretching protocols significantly reduced the number of repetitions (SS: 20.8%, p < 0.001; BS: 17.8%, p = 0.01; PNF: 22.7%, p < 0.001) and total volume (SS: 20.4%, p < 0.001; BS: 17.9%, p = 0.01; PNF: 22.4%, p < 0.001) when compared with NS. The results from this study suggest that, to avoid a decrease in both the number of repetitions and total volume, stretching exercises should not be performed before a resistance training session. Additionally, strength-trained individuals may experience reduced maximal dynamic strength after PNF stretching.
引用
收藏
页码:2432 / 2437
页数:6
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] EFFECTS OF PROPRIOCEPTIVE NEUROMUSCULAR FACILITATION STRETCHING AND STATIC STRETCHING ON MAXIMAL VOLUNTARY CONTRACTION
    Miyahara, Yutetsu
    Naito, Hisashi
    Ogura, Yuji
    Katamoto, Shizuo
    Aoki, Junichiro
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2013, 27 (01) : 195 - 201
  • [2] Effect Of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Stretching And Static Stretching On Maximal Voluntary Contraction
    Miyahara, Yutetsu
    Ogura, Yuji
    Naito, Hisashi
    Katamoto, Shizuo
    Aoki, Junichiro
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2005, 37 : S441 - S441
  • [3] Effects of static, ballistic, and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on vertical jump variables
    Ferreira, Marcela Gomes
    Ribeiro Bertor, Welds Rodrigo
    de Carvalho, Alberito Rodrigo
    Flor Bertolini, Gladson Ricardo
    SCIENTIA MEDICA, 2015, 25 (04)
  • [4] The effect of static, ballistic, and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on vertical jump performance
    Bradley, Paul S.
    Olsen, Peter D.
    Portas, Matthew D.
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2007, 21 (01) : 223 - 226
  • [5] Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation but not Static or Ballistic Stretching Increases One Repetition Maximum Bench Press
    Conley, Donovan S.
    Belt, Jamie L.
    Hochstein, Nicole L.
    Evetovich, Tammy K.
    Engebretsen, Barbara J.
    Todd, Jay B.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2006, 38 (05): : S295 - S295
  • [6] Acute effects of static and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on muscle strength and power output
    Marek, SM
    Cramer, JT
    Fincher, AL
    Massey, LL
    Dangelmaier, SM
    Purkayastha, S
    Fitz, KA
    Culbertson, JY
    JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC TRAINING, 2005, 40 (02) : 94 - 103
  • [7] ACUTE EFFECT OF PROPRIOCEPTIVE NEUROMUSCULAR FACILITATION STRETCHING ON THE NUMBER OF REPETITIONS PERFORMED DURING A MULTIPLE SET RESISTANCE EXERCISE PROTOCOL
    Keese, Felipe
    Farinatti, Paulo
    Massaferri, Renato
    Matos-Santos, Lenifran
    Silva, Nadia
    Monteiro, Walace
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2013, 27 (11) : 3028 - 3032
  • [8] Acute effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and static stretching on maximal voluntary contraction and muscle electromyographical activity in indoor soccer players
    Silva Reis, Erika da Fonseca
    Pereira, Guilherme Borges
    Frade de Sousa, Nuno Manuel
    Tibana, Ramires Alsamir
    Silva, Mauro Fernando
    Araujo, Marcia
    Gomes, Italo
    Prestes, Jonato
    CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY AND FUNCTIONAL IMAGING, 2013, 33 (06) : 418 - 422
  • [9] Eight weeks of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching and static stretching do not affect muscle-tendon properties, muscle strength, and joint function in children with spastic cerebral palsy
    Kruse, Annika
    Habersack, Andreas
    Weide, Guido
    Jaspers, Richard T.
    Svehlik, Martin
    Tilp, Markus
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2023, 107