Patient-Specific Polyetheretherketone Implants for Repair of Craniofacial Defects

被引:29
|
作者
Rammos, Charalambos K. [1 ]
Cayci, Cenk [1 ]
Castro-Garcia, Jose A. [1 ]
Feiz-Erfan, Iman [2 ]
Lettieri, Salvatore C. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Plast Surg, Rochester, MN USA
[2] Maricopa Cty Gen Hosp, Div Neurosurg, Phoenix, AZ 85008 USA
[3] Maricopa Cty Gen Hosp, Div Plast Surg, Phoenix, AZ 85008 USA
关键词
Cranioplasty; alloplastic implants; computer-designed implants; PEEK; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; CALVARIAL RECONSTRUCTION; SKULL DEFECTS; PEEK IMPLANTS; CRANIOPLASTY; SURGERY; HYDROXYLAPATITE; BIOMATERIALS; COMPOSITE; BONE;
D O I
10.1097/SCS.0000000000001413
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Large cranial defects represent reconstructive challenges. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants are preoperatively tailored to the exact size of the defect and exhibit an excellent combination of strength, durability, and environmental resistance. This study presents our experience with patient-specific PEEK implants with computer modeling. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on all patients who underwent cranioplasty treated by a PEEK implant between 2007 and 2012. Analysis of the preoperative and perioperative data as well as outcome analysis was performed. Results: A total of 11 patients were included. Mean age was 46 years. The indication for cranioplasty was bone flap infection and subsequent removal in 8 patients, traumatic bone loss in 2 patients, and acquired defect due to cancer resection in 1 patient. The mean time to PEEK cranioplasty since the patient's last operation was 16 months. The mean defect size was 74cm(2). The mean surgical blood loss was 124 mL. The mean length of stay was 3 days. Complications included 1 postoperative bleeding that required reoperation, but the PEEK implant was successfully salvaged. The mean time to follow-up was 6 months. Conclusions: Use of patient-specific PEEK implants is a good alternative for alloplastic cranioplasty. It is associated with low morbidity as reported in our series, with additional advantages including strength, stiffness, durability, and inertness. It would be beneficial to assess the longer-term outcomes; however, it appears at first glance that PEEK implants show great promise in calvarial reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 633
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mandibular recontouring with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) patient-specific implants
    Nocini, Riccardo
    D'Agostino, Antonio
    Trevisiol, Lorenzo
    Favero, Vittorio
    [J]. BMJ CASE REPORTS, 2022, 15 (04)
  • [2] Patient-Specific Facial Implants in Polyetheretherketone and Their Stability A Preliminary Study
    Saponaro, Gianmarco
    Todaro, Mattia
    Barbera, Giorgio
    Scivoletto, Giulia
    Foresta, Enrico
    Gasparini, Giulio
    Moro, Alessandro
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 90 (06) : 564 - 567
  • [3] Patient-specific implants for maxillofacial defects: challenges and solutions
    Nasser Alasseri
    Ahmed Alasraj
    [J]. Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 42
  • [4] Patient-specific implants for maxillofacial defects: challenges and solutions
    Alasseri, Nasser
    Alasraj, Ahmed
    [J]. MAXILLOFACIAL PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 42 (01)
  • [5] Maxillofacial Reconstruction Using Polyetheretherketone Patient-Specific Implants by "Mirroring" Computational Planning
    Scolozzi, Paolo
    [J]. AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2012, 36 (03) : 660 - 665
  • [6] Patient-Specific Polyetheretherketone Facial Implants in a Computer-Aided Planning Workflow
    Guevara-Rojas, Godoberto
    Figl, Michael
    Schicho, Kurt
    Seemann, Rudolf
    Traxler, Hannes
    Vacariu, Apostolos
    Carbon, Claus-Christian
    Ewers, Rolf
    Watzinger, Franz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 72 (09) : 1801 - 1812
  • [7] Maxillofacial Reconstruction Using Polyetheretherketone Patient-Specific Implants by “Mirroring” Computational Planning
    Paolo Scolozzi
    [J]. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2012, 36 : 660 - 665
  • [8] Polyetheretherketone patient-specific implants (PPSI) for the reconstruction of two different mandibular contour deformities
    Atef, Mohammed
    Mounir, Mohamed
    Shawky, Mohamed
    Mounir, Samy
    Gibaly, Amr
    [J]. ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY-HEIDELBERG, 2022, 26 (02): : 299 - 309
  • [9] Polyetheretherketone patient-specific implants (PPSI) for the reconstruction of two different mandibular contour deformities
    Mohammed Atef
    Mohamed Mounir
    Mohamed Shawky
    Samy Mounir
    Amr Gibaly
    [J]. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2022, 26 : 299 - 309
  • [10] Evolution of design considerations in complex craniofacial reconstruction using patient-specific implants
    Peel, Sean
    Bhatia, Satyajeet
    Eggbeer, Dominic
    Morris, Daniel S.
    Hayhurst, Caroline
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART H-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE, 2017, 231 (06) : 509 - 524