Trends in Penile Prosthetics: Influence of Patient Demographics, Surgeon Volume, and Hospital Volume on Type of Penile Prosthesis Inserted in New York State

被引:19
|
作者
Kashanian, James A. [1 ]
Golan, Ron [1 ]
Sun, Tianyi [2 ]
Patel, Neal A. [1 ]
Lipsky, Michael J. [3 ]
Stahl, Peter J. [3 ]
Sedrakyan, Art [2 ]
机构
[1] Weill Cornell Med, Dept Urol, New York Presbyteriane, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Weill Cornell Med, Dept Hlth Serv & Policy Res, New York, NY USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, New York Presbyteriane, New York, NY USA
来源
JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE | 2018年 / 15卷 / 02期
关键词
Penile Prosthesis; Erectile Dysfunction; Inflatable Prosthesis; Semirigid Prosthesis; New York State; POPULATION-BASED ANALYSIS; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; RATES; IMPLANTATION; REOPERATION; TADALAFIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.12.005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Penile prostheses (PPs) are a discrete, well-tolerated treatment option for men with medical refractory erectile dysfunction. Despite the increasing prevalence of erectile dysfunction, multiple series evaluating inpatient data have found a decrease in the frequency of PP surgery during the past decade. Aims: To investigate trends in PP surgery and factors affecting the choice of different PPs in New York State. Methods: This study used the New York State Department of Health Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative (SPARCS) data cohort that includes longitudinal information on hospital discharges, ambulatory surgery, emergency department visits, and outpatient services. Patients older than 18 years who underwent inflatable or non-inflatable PP insertion from 2000 to 2014 were included in the study. Outcomes: Influence of patient demographics, surgeon volume, and hospital volume on type of PP inserted. Results: Since 2000, 14,114 patients received PP surgery in New York State; 12,352 PPs (88%) were inflatable and 1,762 (12%) were non-inflatable, with facility-level variation from 0% to 100%. There was an increasing trend in the number of annual procedures performed, with rates of non-inflatable PP insertion decreasing annually (P <.01). More procedures were performed in the ambulatory setting over time (P <.01). Important predictors of device choice were insurance type, year of insertion, hospital and surgeon volume, and the presence of comorbidities. Clinical Implications: Major influences in choice of PP inserted include racial and socioeconomic factors and surgeon and hospital surgical volume. Strengths and Limitations: Use of the SPARCS database, which captures inpatient and outpatient services, allows for more accurate insight into trends in contrast to inpatient sampling alone. However, SPARCS is limited to patients within New York State and the results might not be generalizable to men in other states. Also, patient preference was not accounted for in these analyses, which can play a role in PP selection. Conclusions: During the past 14 years, there has been an increasing trend in inflatable PP surgery for the management of erectile dysfunction. Most procedures are performed in the ambulatory setting and not previously captured by prior studies using inpatient data. Copyright (C) 2017, International Society for Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 250
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Re: Trends in Penile Prosthetics: Influence of Patient Demographics, Surgeon Volume, and Hospital Volume on Type of Penile Prosthesis Inserted in New York State
    Seftel, Allen D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (06): : 1379 - 1379
  • [2] Re: Trends in Penile Prosthetics: Influence of Patient Demographics, Surgeon Volume, and Hospital Volume on Type of Penile Prosthesis Inserted in New York State Editorial Comment
    Morey, Allen F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 200 (04): : 691 - 691
  • [3] Impact of Surgeon Case Volume on Reoperation Rates after Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Surgery
    Onyeji, Ifeanyi C.
    Sui, Wilson
    Pagano, Mathew J.
    Weinberg, Aaron C.
    James, Maxwell B.
    Theofanides, Marissa C.
    Stember, Doron S.
    Anderson, Christopher B.
    Stahl, Peter J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (01): : 223 - 228
  • [4] Impact of Surgeon Case Volume on Reoperation Rates after Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Surgery REPLY
    不详
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (01): : 229 - 229
  • [5] Patient satisfaction and surgeon experience with the new AIMS 700™ MS inflatable penile prosthesis
    Ohl, D.
    Henry, G.
    Culkin, D.
    Wilson, S.
    Delk, J.
    Otheguy, J.
    Shabsigh, R.
    Knoll, L. D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2008, 5 : 67 - 67
  • [6] Impact of Surgeon Case Volume on Reoperation Rates after Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Surgery EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Koehler, Tobias S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (01): : 228 - 229
  • [7] SURGEON VOLUME IN PENILE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION CORRELATES WITH RE-OPERATION RATES-NATIONAL MEDICARE ANALYSIS
    Leelani, Navid
    Furtado, Thiago
    Andino, Juan
    Shin, Young
    Rojanasarot, Sirikan
    Sato, Ryoko
    Bernie, Helen
    Bajic, Petar
    Salter, Carolyn
    Halpern, Joshua
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E979 - E979
  • [8] Practice patterns of urologists performing penile prosthesis surgery vary based on surgeon volume: results of a practice pattern survey
    A C Kramer
    J Sausville
    A Schweber
    [J]. International Journal of Impotence Research, 2010, 22 : 262 - 266
  • [9] Practice patterns of urologists performing penile prosthesis surgery vary based on surgeon volume: results of a practice pattern survey
    Kramer, A. C.
    Sausville, J.
    Schweber, A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPOTENCE RESEARCH, 2010, 22 (04) : 262 - 266
  • [10] SURGERY FOR INFECTED PENILE PROSTHESES IN NEW YORK STATE: PRACTICE PATTERNS, OUTCOMES AND IMPACT OF SURGEON FACTORS
    Lipsky, Michael J.
    Golan, Ron
    Onyeji, Ifeanyi
    Munarriz, Ricardo
    Kashanian, James A.
    Stember, Doron S.
    Stahl, Peter J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E315 - E316