Robot-assisted laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology

被引:33
|
作者
Lambaudie, Eric [1 ]
Houvenaeghel, G. [1 ]
Walz, J. [1 ]
Bannier, M. [1 ]
Buttarelli, M. [1 ]
Gurriet, B. [1 ]
De Laparrent, T. [1 ]
Blache, J. L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst J Paoli I Calmettes, Dept Gen & Oncol Surg, F-13273 Marseille 9, France
[2] Inst J Paoli I Calmettes, Dept Anaesthesia, F-13273 Marseille, France
关键词
Robot-assisted laparoscopy; Gynaecological cancer;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-008-0116-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the feasibility and the outcome of gynaecological cancer surgery with the Da Vinci S surgical system (Intuitive Surgical). Methods From February 2007 to September 2007, 28 patients underwent 32 gynaecological procedures in a single centre. Surgical procedures consisted of total hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, and pelvic and/or lombo-aortic lymphadenectomy. In all cases, surgery was performed using both laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic techniques. In this heterogeneous series, a subgroup of 12 patients treated for advanced cervical cancer was compared with a retrospective series of 20 patients who underwent the same surgical procedure by laparotomy. Results Mean age of the entire population was 52.5 years (range 25-72 years) and mean body mass index (BMI) was 25 kg/m(2) (range 18-40 kg/m(2)). Indications for surgery were cervical cancer in 21 cases, endometrial cancer in 7 cases, ovarian cancer in 1 case and cervical dysplasia in 3 cases. Median operating time was 180 min (mean 175.25 min, range 80-360 min) and median estimated blood loss was 110 cc (range 0-400 cc); no transfusions were necessary. No perioperative complications were observed and median time of hospitalisation was 3 days (mean 3.9 days, range 2-8 days). In the subgroup of 12 advanced cervical cancer a significant difference was observed in terms of hospital stay compared with laparotomy; no difference was observed concerning operative time. Fewer complications were observed with laparotomy (33% versus 25%) but more serious complications than with robot-assisted laparoscopy. Conclusion As suggested in the literature, the use of robot-assisted laparoscopy leads to less intraoperative blood loss, less post operative pain and shorter hospital stays compared with those treated by more traditional surgical approaches. Despite the need for more extensive studies, robot-assisted surgery seems to represent a similar technological evolution as the laparoscopic approach 50 years ago.
引用
收藏
页码:2743 / 2747
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robot-assisted laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology
    Eric Lambaudie
    G. Houvenaeghel
    J. Walz
    M. Bannier
    M. Buttarelli
    B. Gurriet
    T. De Laparrent
    J. L. Blache
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2008, 22 : 2743 - 2747
  • [2] Robot-assisted laparoscopy in gynecologic surgery
    Cannone, F.
    Ladaique, A.
    Lambaudie, E.
    Collinet, P.
    Houvenaeghel, G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISCERAL SURGERY, 2011, 148 (05) : E30 - E39
  • [3] Lomboaortic Lymphadenectomy in Gynecological Oncology: Laparotomy, Laparoscopy or Robot-Assisted Laparoscopy?
    Kerbage, Y.
    Kakkos, A.
    Kridelka, F.
    Lambaudie, E.
    Bats, A. S.
    Hebert, T.
    Goffin, F.
    Wallet, J.
    Leblanc, E.
    Hudry, D.
    Narducci, F.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (10) : 3891 - 3897
  • [4] Lomboaortic Lymphadenectomy in Gynecological Oncology: Laparotomy, Laparoscopy or Robot-Assisted Laparoscopy?
    Y. Kerbage
    A. Kakkos
    F. Kridelka
    E. Lambaudie
    A. S. Bats
    T. Hébert
    F. Goffin
    J. Wallet
    E. Leblanc
    D. Hudry
    F. Narducci
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2020, 27 : 3891 - 3897
  • [5] Extraperitoneal Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy by Robot-Assisted Laparoscopy in Gynecologic Oncology Preliminary Experience and Advantages and Limitations
    Narducci, Fabrice
    Lambaudie, Eric
    Mautone, Daniele
    Hudry, Delphine
    Bresson, Lucie
    Leblanc, Eric
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2015, 25 (08) : 1494 - 1502
  • [6] Evaluation of intra- and post-operative outcomes to compare robot-assisted surgery and conventional laparoscopy for gynecologic oncology
    Wang, Liu-Li
    Yan, Pei-Jing
    Yao, Liang
    Liu, Rong
    Hou, Fan
    Chen, Xiao-Hong
    Han, Liang-liang
    Xu, Li-Yuan
    Xu, Hui
    Li, Jing
    Guo, Tian-Kang
    Yang, Ke-Hu
    Wang, Hai-Lin
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 43 (01) : 347 - 353
  • [7] Integration of and training for robot-assisted surgery in a gynecologic oncology fellowship program
    Leitao, M.
    Gardner, G.
    Briscoe, G.
    Santos, K.
    Jewell, E.
    Brown, C.
    Chi, D.
    Barakat, R.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 121 (01) : S128 - S128
  • [8] Robot-assisted Laparoscopy versus conventional Laparoscopy in Denmark
    Lorenz, Judith
    [J]. AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2019, 50 (05) : 476 - 476
  • [9] Gynecologic oncology robot-assisted surgery in octogenarians: Impact of age on hospital stay
    Levin, Gabriel
    Brezinov, Yoav
    Brodeur, Melica Nourmoussavi
    Salvador, Shannon
    Lau, Susie
    Gotlieb, Walter
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2024,
  • [10] Laparoscopy and robot-assisted Surgery in the Gynecology
    Kimmig, R.
    Maass, N.
    [J]. GYNAKOLOGE, 2014, 47 (03): : 164 - 164