Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage versus percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: predictors of successful outcome in patients who fail endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

被引:76
|
作者
Sharaiha, Reem Z. [1 ]
Kumta, Nikhil A. [1 ]
Desai, Amit P. [1 ]
DeFilippis, Ersilia M. [1 ]
Gabr, Moamen [1 ]
Sarkisian, Alex M. [1 ]
Salgado, Sanjay [1 ]
Millman, Jennifer [1 ]
Benvenuto, Andrea [1 ]
Cohen, Michelle [1 ]
Tyberg, Amy [1 ]
Gaidhane, Monica [1 ]
Kahaleh, Michel [1 ]
机构
[1] New York Presbyterian Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
Biliary drainage; Endoscopic ultrasound; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; ADVERSE EVENTS; OBSTRUCTION; CHOLEDOCHODUODENOSTOMY; ERCP; BENIGN; COMPLICATIONS; CHOICE; BYPASS;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-016-4913-y
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Patients with failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are conventionally offered percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD). While PTBD is effective, it is associated with catheter-related complications, pain, and poor quality of life. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is a minimally invasive endoscopic option increasingly offered as an alternative to PTBD. We compare outcomes of EUS-BD and PTBD in patients with biliary obstruction at a single tertiary care center. A retrospective review was performed in patients with biliary obstruction who underwent EUS-BD or PTBD after failed ERCP from June 2010 through December 2014 at a single tertiary care center. Patient demographics, procedural data, and clinical outcomes were documented for each group. The aim was to compare efficacy and safety of EUS-BD and PTBD and evaluate predictors of success. A total of 60 patients were included (mean age 67.5 years, 65 % male). Forty-seven underwent EUS-BD, and thirteen underwent PTBD. Technical success rates of PTBD and EUS-BD were similar (91.6 vs. 93.3 %, p = 1.0). PTBD patients underwent significantly more re-interventions than EUS-BD patients (mean 4.9 versus 1.3, p < 0.0001), had more late (> 24-h) adverse events (53.8 % vs. 6.6 %, p = 0.001) and experienced more pain (4.1 vs. 1.9, p = 0.016) post-procedure. In univariate analysis, clinical success was lower in the PTBD group (25 vs. 62.2 %, p = 0.03). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, EUS-BD was the sole predictor of clinical success and long-term resolution (OR 21.8, p = 0.009). Despite similar technical success rates compared to PTBD, EUS-BD results in a lower need for re-intervention, decreased rate of late adverse events, and lower pain scores, and is the sole predictor for clinical success and long-term resolution. EUS-BD should be the treatment of choice after a failed ERCP.
引用
收藏
页码:5500 / 5505
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage versus percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: predictors of successful outcome in patients who fail endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
    Reem Z. Sharaiha
    Nikhil A. Kumta
    Amit P. Desai
    Ersilia M. DeFilippis
    Moamen Gabr
    Alex M. Sarkisian
    Sanjay Salgado
    Jennifer Millman
    Andrea Benvenuto
    Michelle Cohen
    Amy Tyberg
    Monica Gaidhane
    Michel Kahaleh
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2016, 30 : 5500 - 5505
  • [2] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED BILIARY DRAINAGE VERSUS PERCUTANEOUS TRANSHEPATIC BILIARY DRAINAGE IN MALIGNANT BILIARY OBSTRUCTION AFTER FAILED ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY
    Gandhi, Devika
    Thiruvengadam, Nikhil
    Marya, Neil
    Pawa, Swati
    Saumoy, Monica
    Adler, Douglas
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2024, 99 (06) : AB836 - AB837
  • [3] EUS Guided Biliary Drainage Versus Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage: Predictors of Successful Outcome in Patients Who Fail ERCP
    Sharaiha, Reem Z.
    Desai, Amit P.
    DeFilippis, Ersilia M.
    Salgado, Sanjay
    Millman, Jennifer E.
    Benvenuto, Andrea M.
    Gaidhane, Monica
    Tyberg, Amy
    Kahaleh, Michel
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 148 (04) : S429 - S430
  • [4] Conversion of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage to endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage
    Morita, Shinichi
    Sugawara, Shunsuke
    Suda, Takeshi
    Hoshi, Takahiro
    Abe, Satoshi
    Yagi, Kazuyoshi
    Terai, Shuji
    [J]. DEN OPEN, 2021, 1 (01):
  • [5] Systematic review of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage versus percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage
    Hassan, Zeinab
    Gadour, Eyad
    [J]. CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 22 : S14 - S14
  • [7] Malignant biliary obstruction: endoscopic ultrasound-guided versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided biliary drainage
    Jin, Zheng
    Zhang, Xiaofeng
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 51 (12) : 1185 - 1185
  • [8] ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED HEPATICOGASTROSTOMY VERSUS PERCUTANEOUS TRANSHEPATIC BILIARY DRAINAGE FOLLOWING FAILED ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY: A PROPENSITY MATCHED ANALYSIS
    Koutlas, Nicholas
    Ferris, Taylor
    Pawa, Swati
    Russell, Gregory
    Ponnatapura, Janardhana
    Pawa, Rishi
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 97 (06) : AB238 - AB239
  • [9] Malignant biliary obstruction: endoscopic ultrasound-guided versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided biliary drainage Reply
    Bishay, Kirles
    Forbes, Nauzer
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 51 (12) : 1186 - 1186
  • [10] Role of Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage as an Adjunct to Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
    Verma, Nikita
    Hema, H. K.
    Gupta, Pankaj
    Kang, Mandeep
    Kalra, Naveen
    Jayanta, Samanta Y.
    Harshal, Mandavdhare Y.
    Vishal, Sharma Y.
    Usha, Dutta Y.
    Rakesh, Kochhar Y.
    Sandhu, Manavjit S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 12 (02) : 287 - 292