Family control and corporate social responsibility

被引:164
|
作者
El Ghoul, Sadok [1 ]
Guedhami, Omrane [2 ]
Wang, He [3 ]
Kwok, Chuck C. Y. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6C 4G9, Canada
[2] Univ South Carolina, Moore Sch Business, Columbia, SC USA
[3] Renmin Univ China, Sch Business, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Family control; Corporate social responsibility (CSR); Agency theory; Institutions; East Asia; MULTIPLE LARGE SHAREHOLDERS; SOCIOEMOTIONAL WEALTH; FIRM PERFORMANCE; AGENCY COSTS; OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE; ULTIMATE OWNERSHIP; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; IMPLIED COST; CASH FLOW; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.08.008
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We investigate the impact of family control on corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance. Using newly collected data on the ultimate ownership structure of publicly traded firms in nine East Asian economies, we find that family-controlled firms exhibit lower CSR performance, consistent with the expropriation hypothesis of family control. The negative relationship between family control and CSR is robust to alternative measures of family control, different components of CSR, as well as to endogeneity tests, subsample tests, and alternative estimation methods. We further find that CSR underperformance concentrates in family firms with greater agency problems and in countries with weaker institutions. Moreover, the underperformance of East Asian family firms holds when controlling for the effects of other large shareholders and when comparing with family firms from other countries. These findings contribute to understanding the determinants of CSR and highlight the importance of corporate governance and the institutional environment in improving CSR performance of family-controlled firms. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 146
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Family control, institutional cross holding and corporate social responsibility
    Benkraiem, Ramzi
    Lakhal, Faten
    Hamza, Taher
    Nizar, Hamza
    [J]. ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2022, 42 (04):
  • [2] Corporate Social Responsibility and Family Firms
    Li, Dan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT INNOVATION, 2015, 6 : 239 - 244
  • [3] Corporate social responsibility versus corporate shareholder responsibility: A family firm perspective
    Abeysekera, Amal P.
    Fernando, Chitru S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2020, 61
  • [4] Family ownership and corporate social responsibility disclosure
    Alsaadi, Abdullah
    [J]. SPANISH JOURNAL OF FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING-REVISTA ESPANOLA DE FINANCIACION Y CONTABILIDAD, 2022, 51 (02): : 160 - 182
  • [5] Family involvement and corporate social responsibility disclosure
    Cabeza-Garcia, Laura
    Sacristan-Navarro, Maria
    Gomez-Anson, Silvia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY BUSINESS STRATEGY, 2017, 8 (02) : 109 - 122
  • [6] Corporate social responsibility and family business in spain
    Déniz, MDLCD
    Suárez, MKC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2005, 56 (01) : 27 - 41
  • [7] Corporate Social Responsibility and Family Business in Spain
    María de la Cruz Déniz Déniz
    Ma Katiuska Cabrera Suárez
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2005, 56 : 27 - 41
  • [8] Corporate Social Responsibility of Czech Family Firms
    Starostova, Adriana
    Machek, Ondrej
    [J]. MANAGING AND MODELLING OF FINANCIAL RISKS - 8TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, PT III, 2016, : 973 - 978
  • [9] Family Firms, Chaebol Affiliations, and Corporate Social Responsibility
    Ryu, Haeyoung
    Chae, Soo-Joon
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (06)
  • [10] Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development of Family Business
    Chen Lu
    [J]. LOW-CARBON MODEL WHEN PURSUIT OF URBANIZATION IN CHINA, 2011, : 17 - 20