Computerized Range of Motion Analysis Following Dual Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty, Traditional Total Hip Arthroplasty, and Hip Resurfacing

被引：25

作者：

Klingenstein, Gregory G. ^{[1
]}

Yeager, Alyssa M. ^{[1
]}

Lipman, Joseph D. ^{[2
]}

Westrich, Geoffrey H. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Orthoped Surg, New York, NY 10021 USA

[2] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Biomech, New York, NY 10021 USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2013年 / 28卷 / 07期

关键词：

total hip arthroplasty; range of motion; dual mobility; hip resurfacing; ADVERSE-REACTION; DISLOCATION; INSTABILITY; REVISION; BEARINGS; DIAMETER;

D O I：

10.1016/j.arth.2012.08.017

中图分类号：

R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学（修复外科学）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Newer arthroplasty designs claim to provide superior range of motion (ROM) and greater stability than their predecessors. However, there is no way to compare ROM of implant systems in an equivalent anatomical environment in a clinical setting. This study used computer-aided design to compare ROM after hip resurfacing, 28 mm THA, 36 mm THA, and anatomic dual mobility (ADM) THA in 3D models of 5 cadaver pelvises. ROM to impingement was then tested in 10 different motions and a one-way ANOVA was used to compare results. The hip resurfacing resulted in restricted ROM compared to the other 3 models in all motions except adduction. The ADM, 36 mm, and 28 mm THA resulted in similar ROM. Dual mobility constructs provide comparable ROM in patients where large head THA is not appropriate. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：1173 / 1176

页数：4

共 50 条

[1] Range of motion of large head total hip arthroplasty is greater than 28 mm total hip arthroplasty or hip resurfacing
Lavigne, Martin
Ganapathi, Muthu
Mottard, Sophie
Girard, Julien
Vendittoli, Pascal-Andre
[J]. CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2011, 26 (03) : 267 - 273
[2] Range of Motion After Stemmed Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hip Resurfacing A Clinical Study
Le Duff, Michel J.
Wisk, Lauren E.
Amstutz, Harlan C.
[J]. BULLETIN OF THE HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES, 2009, 67 (02): : 177 - 181
[3] Dual Mobility in Total Hip Arthroplasty
Plummer, Darren R.
Haughom, Bryan D.
Della Valle, Craig J.
[J]. ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 45 (01) : 1 - +
[4] Dual Mobility in Total Hip Arthroplasty
Clair, Andrew J.
Buchalter, Daniel B.
Kugelman, David N.
Deshmukh, Ajit J.
Aggarwal, Vinay K.
Rozell, Joshua C.
[J]. BULLETIN OF THE HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES, 2022, 80 (01): : 4 - 10
[5] Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty in the Very Young Patient
Shrader, M. Wade
[J]. ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2012, 43 (03) : 359 - +
[6] Resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty for hip OA
[J]. Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 2012, 8 (6) : 306 - 306
[7] Dual Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty is not Associated with a Greater Incidence of Groin Pain in Comparison with Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hip Resurfacing: A Retrospective Comparative Study
Stavrakis, Alexandra I.
Khoshbin, Amir
Joseph, Amethia
Lee, Lily Y.
Bostrom, Mathias P.
Westrich, Geoffrey H.
McLawhorn, Alexander S.
[J]. HSS JOURNAL, 2020, 16 (2_SUPPL) : 394 - 399
[8] Gait analysis of patients with resurfacing hip arthroplasty compared with hip osteoarthritis and standard total hip arthroplasty
Mont, Michael A.
Seyler, Thorsten M.
Ragland, Phillip S.
Starr, Roland
Erhart, Jochen
Bhave, Anil
[J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2007, 22 (01): : 100 - 108
[9] Patient Selection for Resurfacing Hip Arthroplasty A Matched Case Study of Resurfacing Hip Arthroplasty Versus Total Hip Arthroplasty
Mortazavi, S. M. Javad
Fertala, Kasia
Restrepo, Camilo
Parmar, Raviinder
Hozack, William J.
[J]. TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2010, 25 (01) : 2 - 7
[10] A randomised study comparing total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty
Girard, J.
Lavigne, M.
Vendittoli, P. -A.
Roy, A. G.
[J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2006, 88B (06): : 721 - 726

← 1 2 3 4 5 →