The Greifswald decommissioning project - strategy, status, and lessons learned

被引:0
|
作者
Sterner, H [1 ]
Rittscher, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Energiewerke Nord GmbH, Lubmin, Germany
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
On the Greifswald site, 8 units of the Russian-designed reactor WWER 440 are located, including several facilities to handle and store fuel and radwaste. Shortly after the reunification of Germany in 1989, the operating units 1 - 5 were switched off and the construction work at the nearly completely installed units 6 - 8 was stopped. After serious investigations to restart some of the units, a decision was finally taken to decommission all units. Due to this decision, massive personnel reductions were unavoidable. Technically the work was primarily focused on the removal of fuel and treatment of operational waste to provide the preconditions for decommissioning and dismantling. To solve this task of management of the spent fuel, operational waste and the large amounts of dismantled material, a large interim storage facility was built at the Greifswald site. This facility was built in order to guarantee that continuous dismantling could be achieved throughout the lifetime of the project. Following extensive but necessary restructuring the owners of the Greifswald site, Energiewerke Nord, have planned and are implementing a challenging nuclear decommissioning programme which is proceeding effectively. This paper describes the strategic approach taken, provides detail of the current status of the work and offers some key lessons which have been learnt to-date.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 253
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Greifswald WWER decommissioning project: Strategy selection
    Sterner, H
    Rittscher, D
    [J]. STRATEGY SELECTION FOR THE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR FACILITIES, SEMINAR PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 149 - 153
  • [2] Lessons learned in decommissioning medical facilities
    Evdokimoff, V
    [J]. HEALTH PHYSICS, 1999, 77 (05): : S77 - S80
  • [3] GTRR decommissioning: Lessons learned.
    Ice, RD
    Hertel, NE
    [J]. HEALTH PHYSICS, 2002, 82 (06): : S172 - S173
  • [4] Decommissioning of nuclear power plants: Project planning and implementation in Greifswald and Rheinsberg
    Rittscher, D
    [J]. SAFE DECOMMISSIONING FOR NUCLEAR ACTIVITIES, 2003, : 325 - 340
  • [5] The SGHWR decommissioning project - waste strategy
    Graham, G
    Napper, M
    [J]. NUCLEAR ENERGY-JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH NUCLEAR ENERGY SOCIETY, 1999, 38 (01): : 59 - 64
  • [6] Decommissioning coal in an extraction culture: the aftermath and lessons learned
    Baker, Patrick R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WORLD ENERGY LAW & BUSINESS, 2018, 11 (03): : 237 - 259
  • [7] Lessons learned and not learned from the SUPPORT project
    Teno, JM
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 1999, 13 (02) : 91 - 93
  • [8] PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND LESSONS LEARNED
    Tull, A.
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 2009, 49 : 503 - 503
  • [9] The ALS project: Lessons learned
    Monckton, Simon
    Collier, Jack
    Giesbrecht, Jared
    Broten, Greg
    MacKay, David
    Erickson, David
    Verret, Sean
    Digney, Bruce
    [J]. UNMANNED SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY VIII, PTS 1 AND 2, 2006, 6230
  • [10] Lessons learned in the IBL project
    Miucci, A.
    [J]. NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2016, 824 : 33 - 34