Average shadow price and equilibrium price: A case study of tradable pollution permit markets

被引:18
|
作者
Liao, Chao-ning [1 ]
Onal, Hayri [2 ]
Chen, Ming-Hsiang [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Econ, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Agr & Consumer Econ, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[3] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Finance, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
关键词
Average shadow price; Tradable pollution permit; Mixed-integer programming; LINEAR-PROGRAMMING PROBLEM; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2008.04.032
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Shadow prices indicate implicit values of limited resources at the margin and provide important information in decision making for resource management. In continuous economic models, shadow prices associated with demand-supply balance constraints represent consumers' willingness to pay and producers' marginal cost, hence they correspond to market equilibrium prices. As well known, however, marginal analysis fails in the case of discrete optimization, such as mixed integer programming. An alternative concept has been introduced in the literature to measure the value of an extra unit of a limited resource in such cases. This concept is based on average rather than marginal values, thus called the average shadow price, and interpreted in the same way as conventional shadow prices. Whether average shadow prices in a discrete economic model can serve as market equilibrium prices has not been addressed in the related literature. The present paper addresses this issue in an empirical setting. Using a tradable pollution permit market as an example, where firms' YES/NO type technology adoption decisions are represented by binary variables, we show that the average shadow price of tradable permits can be interpreted as the equilibrium price only when certain conditions related to the cost structure and emission levels hold. On the other hand, we show that an iterative procedure based on individual firms' cost minimizing behavior presents a better approach for finding a price that can eliminate or reduce the gap between demand and supply of permits in the market. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1207 / 1213
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EQUILIBRIUM PRICING OF CONTINGENT CLAIMS IN TRADABLE PERMIT MARKETS
    Kijima, Masaaki
    Maeda, Akira
    Nishide, Katsumasa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FUTURES MARKETS, 2010, 30 (06) : 559 - 589
  • [2] Transactions costs in tradable permit markets: An experimental study of pollution market designs
    Cason, TN
    Gangadharan, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REGULATORY ECONOMICS, 2003, 23 (02) : 145 - 165
  • [3] Transactions Costs in Tradable Permit Markets: An Experimental Study of Pollution Market Designs
    Timothy N. Cason
    Lata Gangadharan
    [J]. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2003, 23 : 145 - 165
  • [4] Investment Incentives in Tradable Emissions Markets with Price Floors
    Cason, Timothy N. N.
    Stranlund, John K. K.
    de Vries, Frans P. P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMISTS, 2023, 10 (02) : 283 - 314
  • [5] Spatial price equilibrium in interdependent markets: Price and sales configurations
    Haining, R
    Plummer, P
    Sheppard, E
    [J]. PAPERS IN REGIONAL SCIENCE, 1996, 75 (01) : 41 - 64
  • [6] The average shadow price for MILPs with integral resource availability and its relationship to the marginal unit shadow price
    Mukherjee, S
    Chatterjee, AK
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 169 (01) : 53 - 64
  • [7] Equilibrium price in intraday electricity markets
    Aid, Rene
    Cosso, Andrea
    Pham, Huyen
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL FINANCE, 2022, 32 (02) : 517 - 554
  • [8] Pacing Equilibrium in First Price Auction Markets
    Conitzer, Vincent
    Kroer, Christian
    Panigrahi, Debmalya
    Schrijvers, Okke
    Stier-Moses, Nicolas E.
    Sodomka, Eric
    Wilkens, Christopher A.
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2022, 68 (12) : 8515 - 8535
  • [10] SHADOW PRICE IN THE POWER UTILITY CASE
    Herczegh, Attila
    Prokaj, Vilmos
    [J]. ANNALS OF APPLIED PROBABILITY, 2015, 25 (05): : 2671 - 2707