Screening of mango (Mangifera indica) germplasm for identification of sources resistant to mango malformation

被引:0
|
作者
Usha, K. [1 ]
Singh, Om Prakash [1 ]
Yadav, Ashok [1 ]
Deepak, Nayan G. [1 ]
Singh, B. [2 ,3 ]
Sharma, D. K. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] ICAR Indian Agr Res Inst, Div Fruits & Hort Technol, New Delhi 110012, India
[2] ICAR Indian Agr Res Inst, New Delhi 110012, India
[3] CESCRA, New Delhi, India
来源
关键词
Gcrmplasm; Mangifera indica; Mango cultivar; Mango hybrids; Malformation; Resistant susceptible cultivar;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The study was carried out on 72 mango (Mangifera indica L.) cultivars and 107 mango F1 hybrids to group them based on degree of resistance to malformation during the period 2015-17. Intensity of malformation varied significantly among the mango cultivars and F1 hybrids under study. Out of 72 mango cultivars and 107 F1 hybrids studied, only three cultivars namely Bhadauran, Ilaichi and Arka Nilanchal were found to be completely free from the mango malformation disease (0%) and were categorised as resistant. Minimum disease incidence (<10%) was recorded in 11 mango cultivars, one mango species and in eight mango F1 hybrids, viz. H-2-6, H-2-14, H-3-6, H-410, H-5-14, H-8-4, H-8-2. and H-8-11 and were categorized as tolerant. Twelve mango cultivars and 21 mango F1 hybrids were moderately susceptible (10-20%), while another 27 cultivars and 43 F1 hybrids were susceptible (2050%). The highest incidence of floral malformation intensity was recorded in 13 cultivars and 32 F1 hybrids which were categorized as highly susceptible (>50%) to mango malformation. The resistant and tolerant cultivars and F1 hybrids observed in the current study can be used as parents in future breeding programmes for developing a variety resistant to mango malformation.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 332
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Screening of mango (Mangifera indica) seedling germplasm for salt tolerance
    Nigam, JK
    Misra, KK
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2004, 74 (03): : 138 - 141
  • [2] Endemicity in malformation disease of mango (Mangifera indica)
    Chakrabarti, DK
    Pandey, MK
    Kumar, R
    Kumar, S
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2005, 75 (03): : 172 - 174
  • [3] Predictors for forecasting mango (Mangifera indica) malformation
    Chakrabarti, DK
    Kumar, R
    Kumar, S
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2003, 73 (11): : 633 - 635
  • [4] Assessment of loss in yield of mango (Mangifera indica) caused by mango malformation
    Kumar, R
    Chakrabarti, DK
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 1997, 67 (03): : 130 - 131
  • [5] Mango germplasm screening for the identification of sources of tolerance to anthracnose
    Kathy Rosemary Ellen Grice
    Ian Stephen Edward Bally
    Carole Louise Wright
    Cheryldene Maddox
    Asjad Ali
    Natalie Louise Dillon
    [J]. Australasian Plant Pathology, 2023, 52 : 27 - 41
  • [6] Mango germplasm screening for the identification of sources of tolerance to anthracnose
    Grice, Kathy Rosemary Ellen
    Bally, Ian Stephen Edward
    Wright, Carole Louise
    Maddox, Cheryldene
    Ali, Asjad
    Dillon, Natalie Louise
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2023, 52 (01) : 27 - 41
  • [7] Analysing mango (Mangifera indica) malformation in relation to the host age
    Pandey, MK
    Chakrabarti, DK
    Kumar, S
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2003, 73 (07): : 395 - 396
  • [8] Cultivar identification and genetic map of mango (Mangifera indica)
    Kashkush, K
    Jinggui, F
    Tomer, E
    Hillel, J
    Lavi, U
    [J]. EUPHYTICA, 2001, 122 (01) : 129 - 136
  • [9] Cultivar identification and genetic map of mango (Mangifera indica)
    Khalil Kashkush
    Fang Jinggui
    Eli Tomer
    Jossi Hillel
    Uri Lavi
    [J]. Euphytica, 2001, 122 : 129 - 136
  • [10] RAPD analysis of the genetic diversity of mango (Mangifera indica) germplasm in Brazil
    Souza, I. G. B.
    Valente, S. E. S.
    Britto, F. B.
    de Souza, V. A. B.
    Lima, P. S. C.
    [J]. GENETICS AND MOLECULAR RESEARCH, 2011, 10 (04): : 3080 - 3089