Evaluation of the implementation of Get Healthy at Work, a workplace health promotion program in New South Wales, Australia

被引:12
|
作者
Khanal, Santosh [1 ]
Lloyd, Beverley [1 ]
Rissel, Chris [1 ]
Portors, Claire [1 ]
Grunseit, Anne [2 ]
Indig, Devon [2 ]
Ibrahim, Ismail [3 ]
McElduff, Sinead [1 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool Hosp, NSW Off Prevent Hlth, Don Everett Bldg,Level 1, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Australian Prevent Partnership Ctr, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] SafeWork NSW, 92-100 Donnison St, Gosford, NSW 2250, Australia
关键词
chronic disease; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1071/HE16039
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Issue addressed: Get Healthy at Work (GHaW) is a statewide program to reduce chronic disease risk among NSW workers by helping them make small changes to modifiable lifestyle chronic disease risk factors and create workplace environments that support healthy lifestyles. It has two primary components: a workplace health program (WHP) for businesses and online or face-to-face Brief Health Checks (BHCs) for workers. In this paper, we discuss our evaluation to identify areas for improvement in the implementation of WHP and to assess the uptake of BHCs by workers. Methods: Routinely collected WHP and BHC program data between July 2014 and February 2016 were analysed. A baseline online survey regarding workplace health promotion was conducted with 247 key contacts at registered GHaW worksites and a control group of 400 key contacts from a range of businesses. Seven telephone interviews were conducted with service provider key contacts. Results: As at February 2016, 3133 worksites (from 1199 businesses) across NSW had registered for GHaW, of which 36.8% started the program. Similar proportions of GHaW (34.0%) and control (31.7%) businesses had existing WHPs. BHCs were completed by 12 740 workers, and of those whose risks were assessed, 78.9% had moderate or high risk of diabetes and 33.6% had increased or high risk of cardiovascular disease. Approximately half (50.6%) of eligible BHC participants were referred to Get Healthy Information and Coaching Service (GHS) and 37.7% to Quitline. The uptake of face-to-face BHCs compared with online was significantly higher for males, people aged over 35 years, those undertaking less physical activity and those less likely to undertake active travel to work. Service providers suggested that the program's structured five-step pathway did not offer adequate flexibility to support worksites' progress through the program. Conclusions: During the evaluation period, a substantial number of NSW worksites registered for GHaW but their progress was slow because of the limited flexibility offered by the program model. So what? Workplace-based health promotion programs have potential to reach people at risk of chronic disease, but the implementation of such programs need to be more flexible than traditional health promotion programs in terms of delivery modes and timeframes.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 250
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of Get Healthy at Work, a state-wide workplace health promotion program in Australia
    Crane, Melanie
    Bohn-Goldbaum, Erika
    Lloyd, Beverley
    Rissel, Chris
    Bauman, Adrian
    Indig, Devon
    Khanal, Santosh
    Grunseit, Anne
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [2] Evaluation of Get Healthy at Work, a state-wide workplace health promotion program in Australia
    Melanie Crane
    Erika Bohn-Goldbaum
    Beverley Lloyd
    Chris Rissel
    Adrian Bauman
    Devon Indig
    Santosh Khanal
    Anne Grunseit
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 19
  • [3] Applying pragmatic approaches to complex program evaluation: A case study of implementation of the New South Wales Get Healthy at Work program
    Crane, Melanie
    Bauman, Adrian
    Lloyd, Beverley
    McGill, Bronwyn
    Rissel, Chris
    Grunseit, Anne
    [J]. HEALTH PROMOTION JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2019, 30 (03) : 422 - 432
  • [4] Evaluation of a national health promotion program in South Australia
    Baum, F
    Santich, B
    Craig, B
    Murray, C
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1996, 20 (01) : 41 - 49
  • [5] Workplace abuse among correctional health professionals in New South Wales, Australia
    Cashmore, Aaron W.
    Indig, Devon
    Hampton, Stephen E.
    Hegney, Desley G.
    Jalaludin, Bin
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN HEALTH REVIEW, 2012, 36 (02) : 184 - 190
  • [6] Implementation of an Early Childhood Healthy Eating and Physical Activity Program in New South Wales, Australia: Munch & Move
    Green, Amanda M.
    Mihrshahi, Seema
    Innes-Hughes, Christine
    O'Hara, Blythe J.
    McGill, Bronwyn
    Rissel, Chris
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 8
  • [7] A Qualitative Study of Preschool Children's Perspectives on an Oral Health Promotion Program in New South Wales, Australia
    Parmar, Jinal Shashin
    Sanagavarapu, Prathyusha
    Micheal, Sowbhagya
    Chandio, Navira
    Cartwright, Susan
    Arora, Amit
    [J]. CHILDREN-BASEL, 2024, 11 (04):
  • [8] Evaluation of the condom distribution program in New South Wales prisons, Australia
    Dolan, K
    Lowe, D
    Shearer, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2004, 32 (01): : 124 - +
  • [9] The New World of Health Promotion: New Program Development, Implementation, and Evaluation
    Kiger, Patti G.
    [J]. HEALTH PROMOTION PRACTICE, 2010, 11 (01) : 7 - 8
  • [10] HEALTH PROMOTION AT WORK - A NEW PARADIGM FOR WORKPLACE HEALTH
    WYNNE, R
    [J]. ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 1994, 38 (06): : 807 - 809