Sharing Time-to-Event Data with Privacy Protection

被引:0
|
作者
Bonomi, Luca [1 ]
Fan, Liyue [2 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Biomed Informat, 221 Kirkland Hall, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Comp Sci, Charlotte, NC USA
关键词
Provable Privacy; Time-to-event Data; Survival Analysis;
D O I
10.1109/ICHI54592.2022.00014
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Sharing time-to-event data is beneficial for enabling collaborative research efforts (e.g., survival studies), facilitating the design of effective interventions, and advancing patient care (e.g., early diagnosis). Despite numerous privacy solutions for sharing time-to-event data, recent research studies have shown that external information may become available (e.g., self-disclosure of study participation on social media) to an adversary, posing new privacy concerns. In this work, we formulate a cohort inference attack for time-to-event data sharing, in which an informed adversary aims at inferring the membership of a target individual in a specific cohort. Our study investigates the privacy risks associated with time-to-event data and evaluates the empirical privacy protection offered by popular privacy-protecting solutions (e.g., binning, differential privacy). Furthermore, we propose a novel approach to privately release individual level time-to-event data with high utility, while providing indistinguishability guarantees for the input value. Our method TE-Sanitizer is shown to provide effective mitigation against the inference attacks and high usefulness in survival analysis. The results and discussion provide domain experts with insights on the privacy and the usefulness of the studied methods.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 20
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Time-to-event analyses of ecotoxicity data
    Newman, MC
    McCloskey, JT
    [J]. ECOTOXICOLOGY, 1996, 5 (03) : 187 - 196
  • [2] Modeling Discrete Time-to-Event Data
    Beyersmann, Jan
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2018, 74 (01) : 378 - 379
  • [3] Modeling Discrete Time-to-Event Data
    Bringe, Arnaud
    [J]. POPULATION, 2018, 73 (02): : 406 - 407
  • [4] Analysis of time-to-event data with incomplete event adjudication
    Cook, TD
    Kosorok, MR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 99 (468) : 1140 - 1152
  • [5] Survival analysis—time-to-event data and censoring
    Tanujit Dey
    Stuart R. Lipsitz
    Zara Cooper
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    Martin Krzywinski
    Naomi Altman
    [J]. Nature Methods, 2022, 19 : 906 - 908
  • [6] Time-To-Event Data: An Overview and Analysis Considerations
    Le-Rademacher, Jennifer
    Wang, Xiaofei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 16 (07) : 1067 - 1074
  • [7] Are Data Sharing and Privacy Protection Mutually Exclusive?
    Joly, Yann
    Dyke, Stephanie O. M.
    Knoppers, Bartha M.
    Pastinen, Tomi
    [J]. CELL, 2016, 167 (05) : 1150 - 1154
  • [8] Approximation of Bayesian models for time-to-event data
    Catalano, Marta
    Lijoi, Antonio
    Prunster, Igor
    [J]. ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2020, 14 (02): : 3366 - 3395
  • [9] Germination Data Analysis by Time-to-Event Approaches
    Romano, Alessandro
    Stevanato, Piergiorgio
    [J]. PLANTS-BASEL, 2020, 9 (05):
  • [10] Differentiable sorting for censored time-to-event data
    Vauvelle, Andre
    Wild, Benjamin
    Eils, Roland
    Denaxas, Spiros
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 36 (NEURIPS 2023), 2023,