Patient reported outcomes among treatment modalities for prostate cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Johnson, Matthew E. [1 ]
Zaorsky, Nicholas G. [1 ]
Martin, Jeffrey M. [1 ]
Ruth, Karen [2 ]
Greenberg, Richard E. [3 ]
Uzzo, Robert G. [3 ]
Hayes, Shelly B. [1 ]
Smaldone, Marc C. [3 ]
Kutikov, Alexander [3 ]
Viterbo, Rosalia [3 ]
Chen, David Y. T. [3 ]
Hallman, Mark A. [1 ]
Sobczak, Mark L. [1 ]
Horwitz, Eric M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 333 Cottman Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[2] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, 7701 Burholme Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[3] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Urol Oncol, 7701 Burholme Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
关键词
sexual function; brachytherapy; prostate cancer; prostatectomy; radiation therapy; quality of life; comparative effectiveness research; personalized medicine; treatment selection; toxicity; genitourinary; gastrointestinal; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY; EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; CLINICAL TARGET VOLUME; RADIATION-THERAPY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; CONSENSUS GUIDELINES; AMERICAN BRACHYTHERAPY; ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY; URINARY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: To characterize patient reported outcomes for urinary and sexual function using International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) comparing intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), low dose rate brachytherapy (LDR), post-prostatectomy IMRT (PPRT), and radical prostatectomy (RP). Materials and methods: Patients treated for prostate cancer from 2001-2012 completed self-reported SHIM and IPSS surveys. Subgroups were created by baseline score. Mean change from baseline was determined at each time point for the cohort and subgroups. Statistical analysis was performed with generalized estimating equation method. Incontinence was not captured in the questionnaires. Results: A total of 14,523 IPSS surveys from 3,515 men were evaluated. Patients treated with IMRT experienced a minimal decrease in IPSS score from baseline. PPRT scores did not differ from IMRT at any time point (range: +1-3 points from baseline in IPSS score over 50 months). LDR had an initial IPSS rise (between 5-10 points on the IPSS over 1-9 months) versus IMRT but returned to comparable levels at 34 months. RP was associated with a lower IPSS versus IMRT. LDR had the largest rise from baseline, with return toward baseline. A total of 2,624 SHIM surveys from 857 men were evaluated. LDR and PPRT did not differ from IMRT at any time point (range: +1-5 points from baseline in SHIM score for 36 months). RP experienced the largest decline from baseline (up to -7 points on SHIM score), at 3 to 7 months; RP had a larger early decrease in SHIM score versus IMRT between 3 and 22 months, after which there was no difference. Conclusions: IPSS and SHIM score patterns differed among treatment modalities. These data can be used to predict changes in urinary and sexual function over time based on modality and baseline score.
引用
收藏
页码:8535 / 8545
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Comparison of Urinary and Sexual Function Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) Among Treatment Modalities for Prostate Cancer (PCa)
    Johnson, M. E.
    Martin, J. M.
    Ruth, K. J.
    Li, T.
    Greenberg, R. E.
    Uzzo, R. G.
    Hayes, S. B.
    Smaldone, M. C.
    Kutikov, A.
    Wong, Y. N.
    Viterbo, R.
    Chen, D. Y. T.
    Sobczak, M. L.
    Horwitz, E. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S84 - S84
  • [2] Patient-reported outcomes after prostate cancer treatment
    Grover, Surbhi
    Metz, James M.
    Vachani, Carolyn
    Hampshire, Margaret K.
    DiLullo, Gloria A.
    Hill-Kayser, Christine
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2014, 7 (04) : 286 - 294
  • [3] Assessment of patient-reported outcomes among patients with prostate cancer
    Law, AW
    Gause, D
    Raut, M
    Sung, J
    Glendenning, A
    McKiernan, H
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2003, 6 (03) : 234 - 234
  • [4] Patient preferences for treatment modalities for localised prostate cancer
    Teunissen, Frederik R.
    Hehakaya, Charisma
    Meijer, Richard P.
    van Melick, Harm H. E.
    Verkooijen, Helena M.
    van der Voort van Zyp, Jochem R. N.
    BJUI COMPASS, 2023, 4 (02): : 214 - 222
  • [5] Prostate cancer: prostate cancer patient reported outcomes - does more investigation and treatment result in better health?
    Gavin, Anna
    Drummond, Frances J.
    O'Leary, Eamonn
    Gormley, Gerry
    Kinnear, Heather
    Sharp, Linda
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2015, 24 : 16 - 16
  • [6] Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use, Patient-reported Outcomes, and Treatment Satisfaction Among Men With Localized Prostate Cancer
    Ramsey, Scott D.
    Zeliadt, Steven B.
    Blough, David K.
    Fedorenko, Catherine R.
    Fairweather, Megan E.
    McDermott, Cara L.
    Penson, David F.
    Van Den Eeden, Stephen K.
    Hamilton, Ann S.
    Arora, Neeraj K.
    UROLOGY, 2012, 79 (05) : 1034 - 1041
  • [7] Patient-reported Outcomes 12 Years after Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment
    Sharma, Abhishek D.
    Good, Daniel W.
    McNeill, S. Alan
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 (02) : 179 - 179
  • [8] Comparison of the outcomes of various radiation treatment modalities for prostate cancer
    Wong, W. W.
    Schild, S. E.
    Vora, S. A.
    Ezzell, G. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (03): : S176 - S176
  • [9] Comparative effectiveness of new treatment modalities for localized prostate cancer through patient-reported outcome measures
    Zamora, Victor
    Garin, Olatz
    Suarez, Jose Francisco
    Gutierrez, Cristina
    Guedea, Ferran
    Cabrera, Patricia
    Castells, Manuel
    Herruzo, Ismael
    Fumado, Lluis
    Samper, Pilar
    Ferrer, Carlos
    Regis, Lucas
    Pont, Angels
    Ferrer, Montse
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 44
  • [10] Patient reported outcomes (PROs) collection modalities among patients diagnosed with cancer: Online vs in-person
    Boakye, Eric Adjei
    Wilson, Carl
    Zatirka, Theresa
    Tam, Samantha
    Al-Antary, Nada
    Nair, Mrudula
    Poisson, Laila
    Hirko, Kelly
    Ryan, Michael
    Chang, Steven S.
    Movsas, Benjamin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41 (16)