Two-Phase Model Predictive Control and Its Application to the Tennessee Eastman Process

被引:3
|
作者
Zakharov, Alexey V. [1 ]
Bosman, Hermanus S. [1 ]
Jamsa-Jounela, Sirkka-Liisa [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Proc Control & Automat Res Grp, Dept Biotechnol & Chem Technol, Sch Chem Technol, Aalto 00076, Finland
关键词
RECEDING HORIZON CONTROL; CHALLENGE PROCESS; STABILITY; SYSTEMS; PLANT;
D O I
10.1021/ie401294r
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
This paper considers a two-phase model predictive control (MPC) which utilize a parsimonious parametrization of the future control moves to decrease the number of the degrees of freedom of the optimization and, thereby, to reduce the computations. Namely, the future control actions of the dynamic optimization are split into two stages. In the first phase, the control moves are considered as individual degrees of freedom. In the second phase, which is defined as the period between the end of the first phase and the prediction horizon, the control actions are determined using a weighted sum of some open-loop controls selected at the MPC design stage. With this parametrization, the bounds on the manipulated variables need to be treated as linear constraints. Alternatively, this paper estimates the maximum and the minimum of the future control trajectory that allows one to limit the number of the constraints representing the bounds on the MPC inputs. Thus, an additional reduction of the computations is achieved. To test the two-phase MPC, an MPC-based control strategy for the Tennessee Eastman challenge problem is developed, and a comparison of the two-phase MPC with MPC using Laguerre functions and MPC with move blocking is presented.
引用
收藏
页码:12937 / 12949
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nonlinear Model Predictive Control of the Tennessee Eastman process
    Zheng, A
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1998 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, 1998, : 1700 - 1704
  • [2] NONLINEAR MODEL-PREDICTIVE CONTROL OF THE TENNESSEE-EASTMAN CHALLENGE PROCESS
    RICKER, NL
    LEE, JH
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1995, 19 (09) : 961 - 981
  • [3] Revision of the Tennessee Eastman Process Model
    Bathelt, Andreas
    Ricker, N. Lawrence
    Jelali, Mohieddine
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2015, 48 (08): : 309 - 314
  • [4] A Time Window based Two-Dimensional PCA for Process Monitoring and Its Application to Tennessee Eastman Process
    Yuan, Xiaofeng
    Wang, Di
    Wang, Yalin
    Shao, Weiming
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2020 IEEE 9TH DATA DRIVEN CONTROL AND LEARNING SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (DDCLS'20), 2020, : 1364 - 1369
  • [5] Simultaneous design and control of chemical processes with application to the Tennessee Eastman process
    Ricardez-Sandoval, L. A.
    Budman, H. M.
    Douglas, P. L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2009, 19 (08) : 1377 - 1391
  • [6] Multiple model-based control of the Tennessee-Eastman process
    Tian, ZH
    Hoo, KA
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2005, 44 (09) : 3187 - 3202
  • [7] Decentralized control of the Tennessee Eastman Challenge Process
    Ricker, NL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 1996, 6 (04) : 205 - 221
  • [8] Visual method for process monitoring and its application to Tennessee Eastman challenge problem
    Gu, YM
    Zhao, YH
    Wang, H
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2004 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-7, 2004, : 3423 - 3428
  • [9] Process Fault Diagnosis Method Based on MSPC and LiNGAM and its Application to Tennessee Eastman Process
    Uchida, Yoshiaki
    Fujiwara, Koichi
    Saito, Tatsuki
    Osaka, Taketsugu
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2022, 55 (02): : 384 - 389
  • [10] Integrated process and control design by the normal vector approach: Application to the Tennessee-Eastman process
    Munoz, Diego A.
    Gerhard, Johannes
    Hannemann, Ralf
    Marquardt, Wolfgang
    [J]. 21ST EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2011, 29 : 668 - 672