Transport of diazinon in the San Joaquin River Basin, California

被引:9
|
作者
Kratzer, CR [1 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Sacramento, CA 95819 USA
关键词
surface water; water quality; diazinon; San Joaquin River Basin; California; storm runoff; storm hydrology;
D O I
10.1111/j.1752-1688.1999.tb03597.x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Most of the application of the organophosphate insecticide diazinon in the San Joaquin River Basin occurs in winter to control wood-boring insects in dormant almond orchards. A federal-state collaborative study found that diazinon accounted for most of the observed toxicity of San Joaquin River water in February 1993. Previous studies focused mainly on west-side inputs to the San Joaquin River. In this 1994 study, the three major east-side tributaries to the San Joaquin River - the Merced, Tuolumne, and Stanislaus rivers - and a downstream site on the San Joaquin River were sampled throughout the hydrographs of a late January and an early February storm. In both storms, the Tuolumne River had the highest concentrations of diazinon and transported the largest load of the three tributaries. The Stanislaus River was a small source in both storms. On the basis of previous storm sampling and estimated travel times, ephemeral west-side creeks probably were the main diazinon source early in the storms, whereas the Tuolumne and Merced rivers and east-side drainages directly to the San Joaquin River were the main sources later. Although 74 percent of diazinon transport in the San Joaquin River during 1991-1993 occurred in January and February, transport during each of the two 1994 storms was only 0.05 percent of the amount applied during preceding dry periods. Nevertheless, some of the diazinon concentrations in the San Joaquin River during the January storm exceeded 0.35 mu g/L, a concentration shown to be acutely toxic to water fleas. On the basis of this study and previous studies, diazinon concentrations and streamflow are highly variable during January and February storms, and frequent sampling is required to evaluate transport in the San Joaquin River Basin.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 395
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pesticide transport in the San Joaquin River Basin
    Dubrovsky, Neil M.
    Kratzer, Charles R.
    Panshin, Sandra Y.
    Gronberg, Jo Ann M.
    Kuivila, Kathryn M.
    [J]. ACS Symposium Series, 2000, 751 : 306 - 322
  • [2] INPUTS OF THE DORMANT SPRAY PESTICIDE, DIAZINON, TO THE SAN-JOAQUIN RIVER, CALIFORNIA
    DOMAGALSKI, JL
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1994, 207 : 116 - AGRO
  • [3] TRANSPORT OF DIAZINON IN THE SACRAMENTO-SAN-JOAQUIN DELTA, CALIFORNIA, FEBRUARY 1993
    KUIVILA, KM
    CREPEAU, KL
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1994, 207 : 118 - AGRO
  • [4] Paleohydrogeology of the San Joaquin basin, California
    Wilson, AM
    Garven, G
    Boles, JR
    [J]. GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA BULLETIN, 1999, 111 (03) : 432 - 449
  • [5] Paleohydrogeology of the San Joaquin basin, California
    Morton K. Blaustein Dept. Earth P., Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218-2681, United States
    不详
    不详
    [J]. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am., 3 (432-449):
  • [6] Ecological risks of diazinon from agricultural use in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basins, California
    Giddings, JM
    Hall, LW
    Solomon, KR
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2000, 20 (05) : 545 - 572
  • [7] Occurrence of dicofol in the San Joaquin River, California
    Domagalski, J
    [J]. BULLETIN OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, 1996, 57 (02) : 284 - 291
  • [8] Occurrence of dicofol in the San Joaquin River, California
    [J]. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol, 2 (284):
  • [9] Transport of sediment-bound organochlorine pesticides to the San Joaquin River, California
    Kratzer, CR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 1999, 35 (04): : 957 - 981
  • [10] Climate change impacts uncertainty for water resources in the San Joaquin River Basin, California
    Brekke, LD
    Miller, NL
    Bashford, KE
    Quinn, NWT
    Dracup, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2004, 40 (01): : 149 - 164