Preference-based Monte Carlo Weight Assignment for Multiple-criteria Decision Making in Defense Planning

被引:0
|
作者
Schubert, Johan [1 ]
Horling, Pontus [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Def Res Agcy, Div Informat & Aeronaut Syst, Dept Decis Support Syst, SE-16490 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Defense planning; Pareto optimal frontier; preference modelling; belief function; Dempster-Shafer theory; multiple-criteria decision making; MCDM; Monte Carlo; ranking; data analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this paper we develop a multiple process approach for finding the most preferred plan instance within military defense planning. In this problem tens of thousands of alternative plans with different simulation settings are evaluated by multiple measures of effectiveness through simulation. In a sequence of processes, the Pareto optimal frontier of the plans is first found. Using decision makers' preferences where the decision makers may provide incomplete preferences regarding subsets of disjoint measures, these measures are ordered by their importance. Alternative sets of random weights are assigned to the set of measures by a Monte Carlo approach where weights uphold the preferred order. Finally, all plans are evaluated using the weighted measures and the most preferred plans according to a ranking index are further analyzed to provide decision support.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Preference-Based Monte Carlo Tree Search
    Joppen, Tobias
    Wirth, Christian
    Fuernkranz, Johannes
    [J]. KI 2018: ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2018, 11117 : 327 - 340
  • [2] System dynamics and multiple-criteria decision making
    Gottschalk, Petter
    [J]. SYSTEM DYNAMICS REVIEW, 1986, 2 (01) : 67 - 67
  • [3] A framework for dynamic multiple-criteria decision making
    Campanella, Gianluca
    Ribeiro, Rita A.
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2011, 52 (01) : 52 - 60
  • [4] Psychological distortions in multiple-criteria decision making
    Seri, Raffaello
    Bernasconi, Michele
    Choirat, Christine
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 248 - 248
  • [5] Business Research Planning Using Quantitative Multiple-Criteria Decision Making Approach
    Sauian, Mohd Sahar
    Hashim, Haruizwan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2010, : 496 - 502
  • [6] A ranking method for multiple-criteria decision-making
    Borgulya, I
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE, 1997, 28 (09) : 905 - 912
  • [7] Fuzzy multiple-criteria decision making for crop area planning in Narmada river basin
    Gupta, AP
    Harboe, R
    Tabucanon, MT
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2000, 63 (01) : 1 - 18
  • [8] Environmental control using multiple-criteria decision making
    Liu, YH
    Dauer, JP
    Siddiqui, KJ
    [J]. ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL AND CHEMICAL SENSING TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 4205 : 311 - 319
  • [9] A DESCRIPTIVE APPROACH TO MULTIPLE-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    STEWART, TJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1981, 32 (01) : 45 - 53
  • [10] Multiple-criteria decision making: application to medical devices
    Rogalewicz, Vladimir
    Jurickova, Ivana
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS IWBBIO 2014: INTERNATIONAL WORK-CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2014, : 1359 - 1372