Smile esthetic evaluation of mucogingival reconstructive surgery

被引:7
|
作者
Rotundo, Roberto [1 ,5 ]
Genzano, Luigi
Nieri, Michele [2 ]
Covani, Ugo [3 ]
Penarrocha-Oltra, David [4 ]
Penarrocha-Diago, Miguel [5 ]
机构
[1] UCL Eastman Dent Inst, Periodontol, London, England
[2] Univ Florence, Dept Expt & Clin Med, Florence, Italy
[3] Ist Stomatol Toscano, Camaiore, Italy
[4] Univ Valencia, Med & Dent Sch, Valencia, Spain
[5] Via Vasco de Gama 33-3, I-50127 Florence, Italy
关键词
Smiling; Esthetics; Gingiva; Gingival recession; Mucograft; Clinical trials; MULTIPLE GINGIVAL RECESSIONS; ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX; ROOT COVERAGE; COLLAGEN MATRIX; LAYPEOPLES PREFERENCES; GRAFT; PERCEPTION;
D O I
10.1007/s10266-020-00544-6
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
To assess the difference in smile esthetic impact of Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) with or without the adjunct of a collagen matrix (CMX) used as root coverage procedures. Subjects with esthetic demands showing multiple upper gingival recessions of at least 2 mm, without interproximal attachment loss and cervical abrasion no more than 1 mm were recruited and randomized to CAF plus CMX or CAF alone. The Smile Esthetic Index (SEI) was adopted to quantify the quality of the smile recorded at baseline and 12 months after treatment for each treatment group. In addition, between group difference in the SEI was calculated. 24 Patients were treated and analysed. At baseline, mean gingival recession depths were 2.3 +/- 0.7 mm for Test group and 2.6 +/- 1.0 mm for Control group. After 1 year, the residual recession depth was 0.3 +/- 0.4 mm in the CAF + CMX group and 0.6 +/- 0.3 mm in the control group. The SEI at baseline was 8.1 +/- 1.0 and 7.9 +/- 0.7 for Test and Control group, respectively. The between groups difference at 12 months in SEI was 0.4 (95% C.I. - 0.0 to 0.8,P = 0.0697). Twelve months after treatment, CAF + CMX provided a similar SEI compared to CAF alone and the adjunct of a collagen matrix did not show a different impact on the smile esthetic appearance.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 302
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Smile esthetic evaluation of mucogingival reconstructive surgery
    Roberto Rotundo
    Luigi Genzano
    Michele Nieri
    Ugo Covani
    David Peñarrocha-Oltra
    Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago
    [J]. Odontology, 2021, 109 : 295 - 302
  • [2] Mucogingival esthetic surgery
    P. Gill
    [J]. British Dental Journal, 2014, 216 (1) : 7 - 7
  • [3] REGENERATIVE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE PERIODONTAL PLASTIC-SURGERY - MUCOGINGIVAL SURGERY
    MILLER, PD
    [J]. DENTAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1988, 32 (02) : 287 - 306
  • [4] Evaluation of Different Esthetic Smile Criteria
    Al-Johany, Sulieman S.
    Alqahtani, Abdulaziz S.
    Alqahtani, Fahd Y.
    Alzahrani, Adel H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2011, 24 (01) : 64 - 70
  • [5] Functional and esthetic aspects of reconstructive eyelid surgery
    Wermker, K.
    Ahls, M.
    Koeder, D.
    [J]. MKG-CHIRURG, 2019, 12 (04): : 232 - 241
  • [6] Evaluation of Recurring Esthetic Dental Proportion in Natural Dentition with an Esthetic Smile
    Venkatesh, Swapna Bettanapalya
    Shetty, Sheetal
    [J]. PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2018, 12 (04): : 1867 - 1870
  • [7] Plastic reconstructive and esthetic surgery and tobacco, a legal approach
    Saboye, J.
    [J]. ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE PLASTIQUE ESTHETIQUE, 2015, 60 (01): : E67 - E70
  • [8] The Role of Plastic Reconstructive and Esthetic Surgery Discipline in Earthquakes
    Demirdover, Cenk
    Tuncer, Serhan
    Sacak, Bulent
    Konas, Ersoy
    Bingol, Ugur Anil
    Guner, Huseyin
    Tiftikcioglu, Yigit Ozer
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 31 (02) : 31 - 32
  • [9] Quantitation of esthetic guidelines for the mucogingival region.
    Studer, S
    Limpanapa, L
    Schärer, P
    Zappa, U
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 1033 - 1033
  • [10] A Pioneer in Eyelid Plastic, Reconstructive, and Esthetic Surgery: Pietro Gradenigo
    Voltan, Anna
    Zampieri, F.
    Zanatta, A.
    Bonati, M. Rippa
    Bassetto, F.
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 28 (05): : 382 - 384