Hadwiger number and the Cartesian product of graphs

被引:6
|
作者
Chandran, L. Sunil [1 ]
Kostochka, Alexandr [2 ,3 ]
Raju, J. Krishnam [4 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Sci, Dept Comp Sci & Automat, Bangalore 560012, Karnataka, India
[2] Univ Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[3] Russian Acad Sci, Inst Math, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
[4] Univ Waterloo, David R Cheriton Sch Comp Sci, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
基金
俄罗斯基础研究基金会;
关键词
Hadwiger number; Hadwiger's conjecture; graph Cartesian product; minor; chromatic number;
D O I
10.1007/s00373-008-0795-7
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
The Hadwiger number eta(G) of a graph G is the largest integer n for which the complete graph K-n on n vertices is a minor of G. Hadwiger conjectured that for every graph G, eta(G) >= chi(G), where chi(G) is the chromatic number of G. In this paper, we study the Hadwiger number of the Cartesian product G square H of graphs. As the main result of this paper, we prove that eta(G(1) square G(2)) >= h root 1 (1 - o(1)) for any two graphs G(1) and G(2) with eta(G(1)) = h and eta(G(2)) = l. We show that the above lower bound is asymptotically best possible when h >= l. This asymptotically settles a question of Z. Miller (1978). As consequences of our main result, we show the following: 1. Let G be a connected graph. Let G = G(1) square G(2) square ... square G(k) be the ( unique) prime factorization of G. Then G satisfies Hadwiger's conjecture if k >= 2 log log chi(G) + c', where c' is a constant. This improves the 2 log chi(G) + 3 bound in [2]. 2. Let G(1) and G(2) be two graphs such that chi(G1) >= chi(G2) >= clog(1.5)(chi(G(1))), where c is a constant. Then G1 square G2 satisfies Hadwiger's conjecture. 3. Hadwiger's conjecture is true for G(d) (Cartesian product of G taken d times) for every graph G and every d >= 2. This settles a question by Chandran and Sivadasan [2]. ( They had shown that the Hadiwger's conjecture is true for G(d) if d >= 3).
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 301
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hadwiger Number and the Cartesian Product of Graphs
    L. Sunil Chandran
    Alexandr Kostochka
    J. Krishnam Raju
    [J]. Graphs and Combinatorics, 2008, 24 : 291 - 301
  • [2] On the security number of the Cartesian product of graphs
    Jakovac, Marko
    Otachi, Yota
    [J]. DISCRETE APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2021, 304 : 119 - 128
  • [3] The Menger number of the Cartesian product of graphs
    Ma, Meijie
    Xu, Jun-Ming
    Zhu, Qiang
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICS LETTERS, 2011, 24 (05) : 627 - 629
  • [4] The Monophonic Number of Cartesian Product Graphs
    Santhakumaran, A. P.
    Chandran, S. V. Ullas
    [J]. INDIANA UNIVERSITY MATHEMATICS JOURNAL, 2012, 61 (02) : 849 - 857
  • [5] The Independence Number of the Cartesian Product of Graphs
    Friedler, Louis M.
    [J]. ARS COMBINATORIA, 2011, 99 : 205 - 216
  • [6] Zombie number of the Cartesian product of graphs
    Keramatipour, Ali
    Bahrak, Behnam
    [J]. DISCRETE APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2021, 289 : 545 - 549
  • [7] The damage number of the Cartesian product of graphs
    Huggan, Melissa a.
    Messinger, M. E.
    Porter, Amanda
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF COMBINATORICS, 2024, 88 : 362 - 384
  • [8] On the power domination number of the Cartesian product of graphs
    Koh, K. M.
    Soh, K. W.
    [J]. AKCE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GRAPHS AND COMBINATORICS, 2019, 16 (03) : 253 - 257
  • [9] The fast search number of a Cartesian product of graphs
    Xue, Yuan
    Yang, Boting
    [J]. DISCRETE APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2017, 224 : 106 - 119
  • [10] The Reliability Wiener Number of Cartesian Product Graphs
    Poklukar, Darja Rupnik
    Zerovnik, Janez
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL CHEMISTRY, 2015, 6 (02): : 129 - 135