Atheism and epistemic justification

被引:3
|
作者
Corlett, J. Angelo [1 ]
Cangelosi, Josh [2 ]
机构
[1] San Diego State Univ, Dept Philosophy, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
[2] San Diego State Univ, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
关键词
Agnosticism; Atheism; Bifurcation fallacy; Epistemic justification; Antony Flew; Keith Lehrer; Negative existence claims; New atheism; Presumption of agnosticism; Presumption of atheism; Theism; AGNOSTICISM;
D O I
10.1007/s11153-014-9484-z
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
In a recent article in this journal, Andrew Johnson seeks to defend the "New Atheism" against several objections. We provide a philosophical assessment of his defense of contemporary atheistic arguments that are said to amount to bifurcation fallacies. This point of discussion leads to our critical discussion of the presumption of atheism and the epistemic justification of atheism.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 106
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条