Comparison of Docetaxel plus Oxaliplatin + S-1 vs Oxalipatin + S-1 as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

被引:9
|
作者
Zhang, Xin [1 ]
Huang, Hejing [2 ]
Wei, Ziran [1 ]
Zhu, Zhenxin [1 ]
Yang, Dejun [1 ]
Fu, Hongbing [1 ]
Xu, Jiapeng [1 ]
Hu, Zunqi [1 ]
Zhang, Yu [1 ]
You, Qing [1 ]
Huang, Xin [1 ]
Yan, Ronglin [1 ]
Wang, Weimin [1 ]
Cai, Qingping [1 ]
机构
[1] Second Mil Med Univ, Changzheng Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Second Mil Med Univ, Changzheng Hosp, Dept Ultrasound, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
locally advanced gastric cancer; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; radical gastrectomy; propensity score matched analysis; docetaxel; ADVANCED GASTRIC-CANCER; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; PHASE-III; PERIOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY; PREOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY; CURATIVE RESECTION; 1ST-LINE TREATMENT; D2; GASTRECTOMY; OPEN-LABEL;
D O I
10.2147/CMAR.S258360
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: What is the optimal neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) remains debatable. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of docetaxel+oxaliplatin+S-1 (DOS) vs oxaliplatin+S-1 (SOX) as NAC for LAGC. Methods: Data of 248 LAGC patients who received either DOS or SOX as NAC in our hospital between January 2010 and January 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. Propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was applied to minimize the selection bias in both groups. Prognostic factors were screened by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Results: Of the 248 LAGC patients included, 180 patients were subjected to the PSM analysis. Patients in DOS group showed a better tumor response to NAC, higher radical resection rate and RO resection rate than those in SOX group. The overall survival (OS) rate in DOS group was better than that in SOX group, although the overall incidence of Grade 3/4 NAC-related toxicity in DOS group was higher, as represented by leukopenia and neutropenia. Multivariate analysis revealed that the NAC regimen, cTNM stage and the RO resection rate were independent prognostic factors. In addition, patients with TLND less than 16 population showed a worse OS rate. Subgroup analysis indicated that patients benefited from the addition of docetaxel regardless of the clinical T stage, but those with high clinical N stages (N2-3) did not. Conclusion: DOS is a safe and feasible NAC regimen for LAGC, which is worth popularizing in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:6641 / 6653
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Survival Benefit of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with S-1 Plus Docetaxel for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
    Kano, Masayuki
    Hayano, Koichi
    Hayashi, Hideki
    Hanari, Naoyuki
    Gunji, Hisashi
    Toyozumi, Takeshi
    Murakami, Kentaro
    Uesato, Masaya
    Ota, Satoshi
    Matsubara, Hisahiro
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 (06) : 1805 - 1813
  • [2] Survival Benefit of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with S-1 Plus Docetaxel for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
    Masayuki Kano
    Koichi Hayano
    Hideki Hayashi
    Naoyuki Hanari
    Hisashi Gunji
    Takeshi Toyozumi
    Kentaro Murakami
    Masaya Uesato
    Satoshi Ota
    Hisahiro Matsubara
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2019, 26 : 1805 - 1813
  • [3] Neoadjuvant Intraperitoneal and Systemic Chemotherapy Versus Neoadjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy With Docetaxel, Oxaliplatin, and S-1 for Gastric Cancer With Peritoneal Metastasis: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis
    Zhang, Xin
    Huang, Hejing
    Yang, Dejun
    Wang, Peng
    Huang, Xin
    Hu, Zunqi
    Zhang, Yu
    Yan, Ronglin
    Zhu, Zhenxin
    Cai, Qingping
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2021, 20
  • [4] Neoadjuvant Docetaxel, Oxaliplatin, and S-1 in Resectable Advanced Gastric Cancer
    Mo, Dun-Chang
    Qin, Lang
    Ye, Lin-Jing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (34) : 3883 - +
  • [5] Adjuvant Chemotherapy With S-1 Plus Docetaxel Versus S-1 Plus Oxaliplatin in Stage III Gastric Cancer
    Yamamoto, Masaaki
    Omori, Takeshi
    Shinno, Naoki
    Hara, Hisashi
    Mukai, Yosuke
    Sugase, Takahito
    Takeoka, Tomohira
    Mikamori, Manabu
    Kanemura, Takashi
    Hasegawa, Shinichiro
    Akita, Hirofumi
    Haraguchi, Naotsugu
    Nishimura, Junichi
    Wada, Hiroshi
    Matsuda, Chu
    Yasui, Masayoshi
    Miyata, Hiroshi
    Ohue, Masayuki
    [J]. ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 43 (11) : 5015 - 5024
  • [6] Safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 and oxaliplatin plus apatinib for locally advanced gastric cancer.
    Zheng, Ya'nan
    Yang, Xiao
    Ni, Zhentian
    Zhu, Zhenglun
    Xu, Wei
    Yang, Zhongyin
    Liu, Wentao
    Yan, Min
    Zhu, Zhenggang
    Li, Chen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (15)
  • [7] Neoadjuvant Docetaxel, Oxaliplatin, and S-1 in Resectable Advanced Gastric Cancer Reply
    Kang, Yoon-Koo
    Kim, Hyung-Don
    Ryu, Min-Hee
    Noh, Sung Hoon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (34) : 3884 - 3886
  • [8] Validity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 for resectable locally advanced gastric cancer
    Sasaki, Kinro
    Onodera, Shinichi
    Otsuka, Kichiro
    Satomura, Hitoshi
    Kurayama, Eigo
    Kubo, Tsukasa
    Takahashi, Masakazu
    Ito, Jun
    Nakajima, Masanobu
    Yamaguchi, Satoru
    Miyachi, Kazuhito
    Kato, Hiroyuki
    [J]. MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 34 (08)
  • [9] Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and S-1 for resectable locally advanced gastric cancer
    Migita, Kazuhiro
    Nashimoto, Atsushi
    Yabusaki, Hiroshi
    Matsuki, Atsushi
    Aizawa, Masaki
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 21 (01) : 102 - 109
  • [10] Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and S-1 for resectable locally advanced gastric cancer
    Kazuhiro Migita
    Atsushi Nashimoto
    Hiroshi Yabusaki
    Atsushi Matsuki
    Masaki Aizawa
    [J]. International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2016, 21 : 102 - 109