The endometrial receptivity array for diagnosis and personalized embryo transfer as a treatment for patients with repeated implantation failure

被引:368
|
作者
Ruiz-Alonso, Maria [3 ]
Blesa, David [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Diaz-Gimeno, Patricia [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Gomez, Eva [1 ,2 ]
Fernandez-Sanchez, Manuel [5 ]
Carranza, Francisco [5 ]
Carrera, Joan [6 ]
Vilella, Felip [1 ,2 ]
Pellicer, Antonio [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Simon, Carlos [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Fdn Inst Valenciano Infertilidad, Valencia, Spain
[2] Univ Valencia, Inst Univ IVI Incliva, Valencia, Spain
[3] Iviomics, Paterna, Spain
[4] Ctr Invest Principe Felipe, Computat Med Inst, Valencia, Spain
[5] Inst Valenciano Infertilidad Sevilla, Seville, Spain
[6] Clin Girona Unidad Reprod Humana, Girona, Spain
关键词
Endometrial receptivity; repeated implantation failure; prediction tool; ERA test; customized microarray; personalized embryo transfer; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; LOCAL INJURY; IVF FAILURE; WOMEN; REPRODUCIBILITY; PREGNANCY; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.05.004
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To demonstrate the clinical value of the endometrial receptivity array (ERA) in patients with repeated implantation failure (RIF), for guiding their personalized embryo transfer (pET) as a novel therapeutic strategy. Design: Prospective interventional multicenter clinical trial. Setting: University-affiliated infertility and private clinics. Patient(s): Eighty-five RIF patients and 25 comparison patients. Intervention(s): Endometrial sampling and pET guided by ERA. Main Outcome Measure(s): A receptive (R) or nonreceptive (NR) endometrial status according to ERA. Pregnancy (PR) and implantation (IR) rates after pET. Result(s): The ERA test gave an R result of 74.1% in RIF patients versus 88% in control subjects. Clinical follow-up was possible in 29 RIF patients, in whom pET was performed, resulting in 51.7% PR and 33.9% IR. The IRs and PRs in the 6 months after the biopsy showed that pregnancy was not related to the local injury. Twenty-two RIF patients (25.9%) were NR, and in 15 of them a second ERA validated a displacement of the window of implantation (WOI). In eight of them, pET was performed on the day designated by the ERA, resulting in 50.0% PR and 38.5% IR. These results should be considered as preliminary. Conclusion(s): There is an increased percentage of WOI displacement in RIF patients compared with comparison group patients, leading to the concept of pET as a therapeutic strategy. Rescue of NR patients by pET in a displaced WOI results in similar PR and IR. ((C) 2013 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:818 / 824
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The role of transcriptomic biomarkers of endometrial receptivity in personalized embryo transfer for patients with repeated implantation failure
    Aihua He
    Yangyun Zou
    Cheng Wan
    Jing Zhao
    Qiong Zhang
    Zhongyuan Yao
    Fen Tian
    Hong Wu
    Xi Huang
    Jing Fu
    Chunxu Hu
    Yue Sun
    Lan Xiao
    Tianli Yang
    Zhaojuan Hou
    Xin Dong
    Sijia Lu
    Yanping Li
    [J]. Journal of Translational Medicine, 19
  • [2] The role of transcriptomic biomarkers of endometrial receptivity in personalized embryo transfer for patients with repeated implantation failure
    He, Aihua
    Zou, Yangyun
    Wan, Cheng
    Zhao, Jing
    Zhang, Qiong
    Yao, Zhongyuan
    Tian, Fen
    Wu, Hong
    Huang, Xi
    Fu, Jing
    Hu, Chunxu
    Sun, Yue
    Xiao, Lan
    Yang, Tianli
    Hou, Zhaojuan
    Dong, Xin
    Lu, Sijia
    Li, Yanping
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [3] Personalized Embryo Transfer Outcomes in Recurrent Implantation Failure Patients Following Endometrial Receptivity Array With Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing
    Amin, Jayesh, Sr.
    Patel, Ripal
    JayeshAmin, Grishma
    Gomedhikam, Jayaprakash
    Surakala, Swarnalatha
    Kota, Muralikrishna
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (06)
  • [4] Personalized embryo transfer based on RNA sequencing endometrial receptivity test in repeated implantation failure patients: artificial cycle versus natural cycle
    Shu, Mingming
    Yao, Shun
    Zhong, Wei
    Song, Chunlan
    Chen, Fu
    Shang, Wei
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 39 (01)
  • [5] Endometrial receptivity analysis for personalized embryo transfer in patients with recurrent implantation failure: a retrospective analysis of a Chinese cohort
    Jia, Y.
    Sha, Y. L.
    Qiu, Z.
    Guo, Y. H.
    Tan, A. X.
    Huang, Y.
    Zhong, Y.
    Dong, Y. J.
    Ye, H. X.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 36 : 278 - 278
  • [6] Does the endometrial receptivity array really provide personalized embryo transfer?
    Bassil, Rawad
    Casper, Robert
    Samara, Nivin
    Hsieh, Tzu-Bou
    Barzilay, Eran
    Orvieto, Raoul
    Haas, Jigal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2018, 35 (07) : 1301 - 1305
  • [7] Does the endometrial receptivity array really provide personalized embryo transfer?
    Rawad Bassil
    Robert Casper
    Nivin Samara
    Tzu-Bou Hsieh
    Eran Barzilay
    Raoul Orvieto
    Jigal Haas
    [J]. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2018, 35 : 1301 - 1305
  • [8] Is Endometrial Receptivity Assay (ERA) Useful in Patients with Repeated Implantation Failure Undergoing Single, Autologous Euploid Embryo Transfer?
    Ozaltin, Selin
    Celik, Hale Goksever
    Takmaz, Ozguc
    Yagmur, Erbil
    Ozbasli, Esra
    Gungor, Mete
    Yeh, John
    Bastu, Ercan
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 49 (09):
  • [9] Endometrial receptivity array (ERA) and the use of personalized embryo transfer (pET) in cases undergoing comprehensive chromosomal screening (CCS) for implantation failure (IF)
    Findikli, N.
    Boynukalin, F. K.
    Yagmur, E.
    Kavrut, M.
    Karlikaya, G.
    Gultomruk, M.
    Bahceci, M.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 : 399 - 400
  • [10] Personolized embryo transfer (pET) after Endometrial Receptivity Array (ERA) in patients with recurrent implantation failure -an observational study
    Arikan, G.
    Findikli, N.
    Yagmur, E.
    Karlikaya, G.
    Gultomruk, M.
    Bahceci, M.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2015, 30 : 268 - 268