Phonetic detail that distinguishes prefixed from pseudo-prefixed words

被引:22
|
作者
Smith, Rachel [1 ]
Baker, Rachel [2 ]
Hawkins, Sarah [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Lab Phonet, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Act Hearing Loss, Biomed Res Dept, London EC1Y 8SL, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Fac Mus, Ctr Mus & Sci, Cambridge CB3 9DP, England
关键词
MORPHOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY; PROSODIC CUES; ENGLISH; SEGMENTATION; DURATION; DUTCH; REPRESENTATIONS; RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; BOUNDARIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.wocn.2012.04.002
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Most English prefixes are syllables that can also begin words in which they do not function as a productive prefix. The literature notes a pronunciation difference such that true-prefixes, e.g. /dis/ in discolour, have a heavier rhythmic beat than pseudo-prefixes, e.g. /dis/ in discover. When the syllable following dis- or mis- begins with a voiceless stop, there is a clear difference in its VOT, but differences in dis/mis itself are more subtle and have not been systematically measured. Five speakers of Southern British English engaged in 40 scripted dialogues which contained such words in controlled phonetic contexts. Prefixed words were longer up to voicing onset in syllable 2 and had longer and more peripheral [1], longer VOT, and shorter [s] than pseudo-prefixed words. These differences produced distinctive acoustic patterns consistent with the difference in perceived beat. Effects due to nuclear/postnuclear accent and word frequency were observed, but appear to be secondary to effects of morphological status. We conclude that the morphological status of these syllables is the primary cause of their characteristic acoustic patterns, and that their segmental composition dictates further reduction processes they may undergo due to weaker prosodic contexts, higher word frequency, casual register, and other influences. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:689 / 705
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Derivational morphology and access to the lexicon: The cases of prefixed and pseudo-prefixed verbs
    Babin, JP
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 1996, 50 (04): : 371 - 385
  • [2] Phonetic and lexical gradience in Polish prefixed words
    Kraska-Szlenk, Iwona
    Zygis, Marzena
    COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS, 2012, 23 (02) : 317 - 366
  • [3] WORDS PREFIXED BY DES-
    Martin Garcia, Josefa
    BOLETIN DE LA REAL ACADEMIA ESPANOLA, 2007, 87 (295): : 5 - +
  • [4] Decomposition of Prefixed Words in Russian
    Kazanina, Nina
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2011, 37 (06) : 1371 - 1390
  • [5] MEMORY REPRESENTATION FOR PREFIXED WORDS
    STANNERS, RF
    NEISER, JJ
    PAINTON, S
    JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1979, 18 (06): : 733 - 743
  • [6] Obligatory decomposition in reading prefixed words
    Taft, Marcus
    Ardasinski, Sam
    MENTAL LEXICON, 2006, 1 (02): : 183 - 199
  • [7] PROCESSING PREFIXED WORDS IN BROCA APHASIA
    MATHEWS, PJ
    OBLER, LK
    BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1994, 47 (03) : 412 - 414
  • [8] LEXICAL STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL OF PREFIXED WORDS
    TAFT, M
    FORSTER, KI
    JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1975, 14 (06): : 638 - 647
  • [9] VISUAL AND AUDITORY RECOGNITION OF PREFIXED WORDS
    TAFT, M
    HAMBLY, G
    KINOSHITA, S
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 38 (03): : 351 - 365
  • [10] The processing of novel and lexicalised prefixed words in reading
    Pollatsek, Alexander
    Slattery, Timothy J.
    Juhasz, Barbara
    LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 2008, 23 (7-8): : 1133 - 1158