REDD+ and rural livelihoods

被引:56
|
作者
Groom, Ben [2 ]
Palmer, Charles [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Dept Geog & Environm, London WC2A 2AE, England
[2] Univ London Sch Oriental & African Studies, Dept Econ, London WC1H 0XG, England
关键词
Constraints; Livelihoods; PES; Poverty; REDD; LAND CONVERSION PROGRAM; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; URBAN MIGRATION; PAYMENTS; CHINA; CONSERVATION; DEFORESTATION; POVERTY; CONSTRAINTS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2012.03.002
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Focusing on incentive schemes that induce participation in land-use activities to supply environmental services, this paper examines the potential impacts of REDD+ on livelihoods, in particular with respect to incomes and poverty alleviation. Two case studies, each at a different scale, are presented. First, the N'hambita Community Carbon Project in Mozambique, a REDD+ project, promoted agro-forestry and reforestation activities along with alternative livelihoods. Second, the Sloping Lands Conversion Programme (SLCP) in China is a national-level reforestation scheme to supply watershed services. Impacts on the poor are addressed through the 'lens' of a rural household allocating its labour supply to different income sources. Four aspects of REDD+ policy are discussed: the incentives necessary for ensuring the cost-effective, long-run sustainability of both carbon sinks and incomes; the implications for forest conservation, in particular biodiversity; the need for scaling up carbon sequestration activities in order to minimise carbon leakage; and, the possibilities to maximise the participation of the poor and alleviate poverty. Finally, the paper highlights the importance of using appropriate methodologies for correct evaluation of policy impacts on incomes. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 52
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Market-Based Conservation for Better Livelihoods? The Promises and Fallacies of REDD+ in Tanzania
    Scheba, Andreas
    [J]. LAND, 2018, 7 (04)
  • [2] REDD+ governance
    Lederer, Markus
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2012, 3 (01) : 107 - 113
  • [3] Interdisciplinary perspectives on REDD+
    Visseren-Hamakers, Ingrid J.
    Gupta, Aarti
    Herold, Martin
    Pena-Claros, Marielos
    Vijge, Marjanneke J.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2012, 4 (06) : 587 - 589
  • [4] Biodiversity monitoring for REDD+
    Dickson, Barney
    Kapos, Valerie
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2012, 4 (06) : 717 - 725
  • [5] REDD+ in Asia Pacific
    Andrew McGregor
    [J]. Nature Climate Change, 2015, 5 : 623 - 624
  • [6] Governing and implementing REDD+
    Corbera, Esteve
    Schroeder, Heike
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2011, 14 (02) : 89 - 99
  • [7] REDD+, Conservation, and Conversion
    Soedomo, Sudarsono
    [J]. JURNAL MANAJEMEN HUTAN TROPIKA, 2018, 24 (03): : 196 - 201
  • [8] Institutions and Policies to Protect Rural Livelihoods in REDD plus Regimes
    Lawlor, Kathleen
    Weinthal, Erika
    Lander, Lydia
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2010, 10 (04) : 1 - +
  • [9] Mobile payments for REDD+
    Michele Graffeo
    [J]. Nature Climate Change, 2017, 7 : 472 - 472
  • [10] Cameroon: not ready for REDD+
    Benoît Bosquet
    [J]. Nature, 2011, 474 : 36 - 36