The evaluation of parametric and non-parametric models for total forest biomass estimation using UAS-LiDAR

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Kun [1 ]
Shen, Xin [1 ]
Cao, Lin [1 ]
Wang, Guibin [1 ]
Cao, Fuliang [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Forestry Univ, Coinnovat Ctr Sustainable Forestry Southern China, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
UAS-LiDAR; total forest biomass; parametric model; random forest; BIOPHYSICAL PROPERTIES; CANOPY STRUCTURE; LASER; STANDS; LEVEL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Forest biomass estimation has drawn substantial attention due to its major impact on climate change and sustainable forest management. In this study, we assessed the performance of distributional and calibrated intensity metrics derived from the Unmanned Aerial System-Light Detection and Ranging (UAS-LiDAR) data to estimate total forest biomass individually and in combination over a ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba L.) planted forest in southeast China. First, the importance of these metrics were investigated and the optimal UAS-LiDAR metrics were selected by the "all-subsets" models. Then, the parametric (multivariate linear model (MLR)) and non-parametric (random forest (RF)) models were investigated for total forest biomass estimation. The results showed that, in general, the combo models (based on distributional and intensity metrics) (CV-R-2=0.92-0.94, rRMSE=7.13%-7.62%) performed better than the separated models (CV-R-2=0.90-0.92, rRMSE=8.05%-9.53%). Secondly, the estimation accuracy obtained from RF (CV-R-2 =0.92-0.94, rRMSE=7.13%-8.05%) was relatively higher than the MLR (CV-R-2=0.88-0.90, rRMSE=7.62%-9.53%). This study demonstrated that compared with the MLR model, RF has stronger potential to enhance the performance of biomass estimation by using UAS-LiDAR-derived metrics, and the implementation of calibrated intensity metrics has shown marked contributions to total forest biomass estimation in planted forest.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 279
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PARAMETRIC AND NON-PARAMETRIC FOREST BIOMASS ESTIMATION FROM POLINSAR DATA
    Neumann, Maxim
    Saatchi, Sassan S.
    Ulander, Lars M. H.
    Fransson, Johan E. S.
    [J]. 2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2011, : 420 - 423
  • [2] Simulated Non-Parametric Estimation of Dynamic Models
    Altissimo, Filippo
    Mele, Antonio
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2009, 76 (02): : 413 - 450
  • [3] Non-parametric estimation and evaluation of capability sets
    Verbunt, Pim
    Rogge, Nicky
    Van Puyenbroeck, Tom
    [J]. OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 2022, 74 (01): : 265 - 296
  • [4] Density estimation using non-parametric and semi-parametric mixtures
    Wang, Yong
    Chee, Chew-Seng
    [J]. STATISTICAL MODELLING, 2012, 12 (01) : 67 - 92
  • [5] Estimation of Cost Efficiency in Non-parametric Frontier Models
    Besstremyannaya, G.
    Simm, J.
    [J]. VESTNIK SANKT-PETERBURGSKOGO UNIVERSITETA-EKONOMIKA-ST PETERSBURG UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2019, 35 (01): : 3 - 21
  • [6] Non-Parametric Identification and Estimation of Truncated Regression Models
    Chen, Songnian
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2010, 77 (01): : 127 - 153
  • [7] Non-parametric estimation for NHPP software reliability models
    Wang, Zhiguo
    Wang, Jinde
    Liang, Xue
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2007, 34 (01) : 107 - 119
  • [8] Bayesian non-parametric models for regional prevalence estimation
    Branscum, Adam J.
    Hanson, Timothy E.
    Gardner, Ian A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2008, 35 (05) : 567 - 582
  • [9] Non-parametric if and DOA estimation
    Djurovic, I
    Stankovic, L
    [J]. SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SIGNAL PROCESSING AND ITS APPLICATIONS, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 149 - 152
  • [10] NON-PARAMETRIC ESTIMATION OF SURVIVORSHIP
    MEIER, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1955, 50 (270) : 589 - 589