The importance of climate, productivity, habitat heterogeneity, and human impact on the distribution of bird of prey species richness across two continents latitudinal gradient (Europe and Africa)

被引:0
|
作者
Stefanescu, Dragos Mihail [1 ]
Radutoiu, Daniel [1 ]
Marinescu, Emil [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Craiova, Dept Biol & Environm Engn, Fac Hort, Craiova, Romania
[2] Univ Craiova, Dept Geog, Fac Sci, Craiova, Romania
关键词
bird of prey species richness; latitudinal gradient; climate; productivity; habitat heterogeneity; human influence; SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION; TOP PREDATORS; ENVIRONMENTAL HETEROGENEITY; AUTOREGRESSIVE MODELS; RELATIVE INFLUENCE; SCALE PATTERNS; ENERGY; BIODIVERSITY; DIVERSITY; ECOLOGY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
The objective of this paper was to identify the main factors that explain the greater part of variation in bird of prey species richness (BPSR) along latitudinal gradient, particularly from Northern Europe to South Africa. For this purpose we used 26 environmental variables grouped according to the main hypotheses proposed to explain the regional variability in species richness. Because the relationship between species richness and environmental variables vary with spatial scale, we used two type of grain size (100 km x 100 km and 200 km x 200 km). To link explanatory environmental variables to BPSR, for each grain size, we used two multiple regression methods: a global model, the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and a local model, the Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR). Further, we designed 11 different models based on combination of the environmental variables, both for OLS and GWR methods, in order to select the best one. For OLS method, variation in BPSR across the study area was best predicted by total model (all variables), both for finer (R-2 adjusted = 0.712; AIC(c) = 22394.89) and coarser spatial scales (R-2 adjusted = 0.804; AIC(c) = 4888.98). For GWR method, the (climate + habitat heterogeneity) model was the best model regarding variation explaination and model performances, both for finer (R-2 adjusted = 0.953; AIC(c) = 16890.49) and coarser (R-2 adjusted = 0.958; AIC(c) = 3909.18) resolutions. The GWR regression models performed better than OLS models in explaining variation in BPSR, the improvement of models performance was evident. In our study, both regression methods and analysis of variance partitioning lead to the conclusion that climate (particularly PC2) and habitat heterogeneity (particularly HABNB) were the most influental factors in determining BPSR at the spatial scales analyzed in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 296
页数:12
相关论文
共 2 条
  • [1] Bird species richness patterns of northern Taiwan: primary productivity, human population density, and habitat heterogeneity
    Koh, Chao-Nien
    Lee, Pei-Fen
    Lin, Ruey-Shing
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2006, 12 (05) : 546 - 554
  • [2] Deconstructing the mammal species richness pattern in Europe - towards an understanding of the relative importance of climate, biogeographic history, habitat heterogeneity and humans
    Flojgaard, Camilla
    Normand, Signe
    Skov, Flemming
    Svenning, Jens-Christian
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2011, 20 (02): : 218 - 230