Effects of bond gap thickness on the fracture of nano-toughened epoxy adhesive joints

被引:57
|
作者
Cooper, V. [1 ]
Ivankovic, A. [1 ]
Karac, A. [2 ]
McAuliffe, D. [1 ]
Murphy, N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Mech & Mat Engn, Dublin 2, Ireland
[2] Univ Zenica, Fac Mech Engn, Zenica, Bosnia & Herceg
关键词
Fracture toughness; Bond gap thickness; Nano-toughened adhesives; COHESIVE-ZONE MODELS; DUCTILE-BRITTLE TRANSITIONS; CRACK-GROWTH RESISTANCE; VOID GROWTH; NUMERICAL-ANALYSIS; PART II; POLYMERS; TOUGHNESS; MECHANISMS; SEPARATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.polymer.2012.09.049
中图分类号
O63 [高分子化学(高聚物)];
学科分类号
070305 ; 080501 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The current work is a combined experimental-numerical study of the fracture behaviour of a nano-toughened, structural epoxy adhesive. The mode I fracture toughness of the adhesive is measured using tapered double-cantilever beam (TDCB) tests with various bond gap thicknesses ranging from 0.25 mm to 2.5 mm. Circumferentially deep-notched tensile specimens are independently employed to measure the cohesive strength of the adhesive as a function of constraint. The experimental TDCB test results are predicted numerically for each bond gap thickness using the Finite Volume method and a Dugdale cohesive zone model. A unique relationship between the fracture energy and the constraint level is established. The effect of bond gap thickness on the fracture behaviour of TDCB joints is hence directly attributed to the variation of the intrinsic fracture energy with constraint and not to the variation of the 'far field' plastic zone size with bond gap thickness. Using the well known Rice and Tracey void growth model, a link is established between the voids observed in the fracture process zone, the constraint imposed by the thickness of the adhesive and the resulting fracture energy. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5540 / 5553
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Characterisation of the Fracture Energy and Toughening Mechanisms of a Nano-toughened Epoxy Adhesive
    Mc Auliffe, D.
    Karac, A.
    Murphy, N.
    Ivankovic, A.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN FRACTURE AND DAMAGE MECHANICS X, 2012, 488-489 : 573 - 576
  • [2] Effect of adhesive thickness on fatigue and fracture of toughened epoxy joints - Part I: Experiments
    Azari, S.
    Papini, M.
    Spelt, J. K.
    [J]. ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2011, 78 (01) : 153 - 162
  • [3] Fracture behaviour of a rubber nano-modified structural epoxy adhesive: Bond gap effects and fracture damage zone
    Quan, Dong
    Murphy, Neal
    Ivankovic, Alojz
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2017, 77 : 138 - 150
  • [4] Fracture load predictions and measurements for highly toughened epoxy adhesive joints
    Azari, S.
    Eskandarian, M.
    Papini, M.
    Schroeder, J. A.
    Spelt, J. K.
    [J]. ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2009, 76 (13) : 2039 - 2055
  • [5] Mode I fracture modeling of elastomer toughened epoxy adhesive joints
    M. Todo
    S.K. Chaturvedi
    R.L. Sierakowski
    [J]. International Journal of Fracture, 1997, 85 : 301 - 312
  • [6] Mode I fracture modeling of elastomer toughened epoxy adhesive joints
    Todo, M
    Chaturvedi, SK
    Sierakowski, RL
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FRACTURE, 1997, 85 (04) : 301 - 312
  • [7] Effects of Epoxy Adhesive Layer Thickness on Bond Strength of Joints in Concrete Structures
    Yeon, Jaeheum
    Song, Yooseob
    Kim, Kwan Kyu
    Kang, Julian
    [J]. MATERIALS, 2019, 12 (15)
  • [8] Effect of bond thickness on fracture toughness of adhesive joints
    Lee, DB
    Ikeda, T
    Miyazaki, N
    Choi, NS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2004, 126 (01): : 14 - 18
  • [9] Effect of bond thickness on fracture behaviour in adhesive joints
    Yan, C
    Mai, YW
    Ye, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADHESION, 2001, 75 (01): : 27 - 44
  • [10] Effect of adhesive thickness on fatigue and fracture of toughened epoxy joints - Part II: Analysis and finite element modeling
    Azari, S.
    Papini, M.
    Spelt, J. K.
    [J]. ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2011, 78 (01) : 138 - 152