Electricity purchase agreements and distributed energy policies for anaerobic digesters

被引:12
|
作者
Binkley, David [1 ]
Harsh, Stephen [1 ]
Wolf, Christopher A. [1 ]
Safferman, Steven [2 ]
Kirk, Dana [2 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Agr Food & Resource Econ, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Biosyst & Agr Engn, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
Anaerobic digestion; Distributed generation; Power purchase agreements; MANURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.065
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Anaerobic digestion is increasingly recognized for its ability to produce renewable energy and reduce greenhouse gas emissions from livestock operations. In 2010, there were 2645 U.S. dairy farms with herd sizes large enough to support anaerobic digesters, yet only 156 systems were in operation (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), 2010a. Market Opportunities for Biogas Recovery Systems at U.S. Livestock Facilities. AgSTAR Program; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), 2011. Operational Anaerobic Digesters, Sorted by State (Dairy). AgSTAR Program.).(1) This study analyzes the net present value of digester systems under alternative electricity purchase agreements and how returns are affected by standby charges, net metering policies and the use of feed-in-tariffs. In order for digester potential to be fully realized on a state or national level, changes to distributed energy policy are required. Results indicated that standby charges can reduce revenues from offsetting electricity by an average of nearly 20%. Net metering rules limit participation among larger farms and negatively affect profitability by restricting engine-generator size. Lastly, the effectiveness of a fixed price feed-in-tariff policy for digesters is significantly affected by project size differentiation. Digester energy policies are similar nationwide, making this study useful for government regulatory agencies and digester owners throughout the U.S. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 352
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ADVANTAGES IN ELECTRICAL ENERGY PURCHASE AGREEMENTS
    DEPARADE, K
    ELEKTROTECHNISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT B-AUSGABE, 1978, 30 (06): : 210 - 214
  • [2] Determining the guaranteed energy purchase price for Distributed Generation in electricity distribution networks
    Larimi, S. M. Miri
    Haghifam, M. R.
    Ghadiri, A.
    UTILITIES POLICY, 2016, 41 : 118 - 127
  • [3] The Impact of Renewable Energy Policies on the Adoption of Anaerobic Digesters with Farm-Fed Wastes in Great Britain
    Gowreesunker, Baboo Lesh
    Tassou, Savvas A.
    ENERGIES, 2016, 9 (12):
  • [4] Impact of India's power purchase agreements on electricity sector decarbonization
    Kumar, Pankaj
    Mishra, Trupti
    Banerjee, Rangan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 373
  • [5] Electricity procurement of large consumers considering power-purchase agreements
    Arellano, Jose
    Carrion, Miguel
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2023, 9 : 5384 - 5396
  • [6] Anaerobic digesters: From waste to energy crops as an alternative energy source
    Kocar, G.
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2008, 30 (07) : 660 - 669
  • [7] Sustainable Energy Strategies for Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs)
    Stanitsas, Marios
    Kirytopoulos, Konstantinos
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (08)
  • [8] Self-heating of anaerobic digesters using energy crops
    Lindorfer, H
    Braun, R
    Kirchmayr, R
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 53 (08) : 159 - 166
  • [9] Contribution of Anaerobic Digesters to Emissions Mitigation and Electricity Generation Under US Climate Policy
    Zaks, David P. M.
    Winchester, Niven
    Kucharik, Christopher J.
    Barford, Carol C.
    Paltsev, Sergey
    Reilly, John M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 45 (16) : 6735 - 6742
  • [10] Coupling electric energy and biogas production in anaerobic digesters - impacts on the microbiome
    Koch, Christin
    Kuchenbuch, Anne
    Kretzschmar, Joerg
    Wedwitschka, Harald
    Liebetrau, Jan
    Mueller, Susann
    Harnisch, Falk
    RSC ADVANCES, 2015, 5 (40) : 31329 - 31340