Computer-Assisted Navigational Surgery Improves Outcomes in Orbital Reconstructive Surgery

被引:54
|
作者
Cai, Elijah Zhengyang [2 ]
Koh, Yun Pei [2 ]
Hing, Eileen Chor Hoong
Low, Jin Rong [2 ]
Shen, Jia Yi [2 ]
Wong, Hung Chew [2 ,3 ]
Sundar, Gangadhara [4 ]
Lim, Thiam Chye [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Dept Surg, Div Plast Reconstruct & Aesthet Surg, Singapore 119228, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Singapore 117595, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Biostat Unit, Singapore 117548, Singapore
[4] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Dept Ophthalmol, Singapore 119228, Singapore
关键词
Orbit; orbital; reconstruction; navigation; computer assisted; ISOLATED BLOWOUT FRACTURES; INTRAOPERATIVE NAVIGATION; MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY; FLOOR; STEREOLITHOGRAPHY; REGISTRATION; ENOPHTHALMOS; ACCURACY; IMPLANTS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1097/SCS.0b013e318260ef33
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Orbital reconstruction is a difficult procedure, success of which is dependent on the surgeon's experience. The lack of objective methods requires a fair amount of estimation is its execution. This study evaluates the efficacy of Kolibri (BrainLab, Munich, Germany), an intraoperative navigation device, in improving outcomes. From 2004 to 2009, 58 patients with orbital trauma who underwent surgery at the National University Hospital, Singapore, were included in this prospective matched control trial. Twenty-nine consecutive patients underwent surgery with Kolibri. The control group underwent surgery without the device. Both groups were matched for age, sex, orbital wall fracture, preoperative ophthalmologic features, etiology and severity of trauma, surgical approach, and types of implant used. The postoperative follow-up was at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. For subjective assessment, the postoperative ophthalmologic features, including diplopia, infraorbital hypoesthesia, ophthalmoplegia, and enophthalmos, were compared. At 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively, there were fewer patients with postoperative ophthalmologic complications in the study group (italicized; n = 29) compared with the control group (n = 29; P < 0.05): 12/29 (41%) versus 21/29 (72%), 8/29 (28%) versus 19/29 (66%), 5/29 (17%) versus 15/29 (52%), and 2/29 (7%) versus 12/29 (41%). For objective assessment, using the Kolibri workstation, operative plans were created and fused with postoperative computed tomographic scans. Vertical distances between the actual reconstructed and planned orbital floors were measured. On average, the vertical distance measured from the boundaries of floor defects for patients in the study group was 3.24 mm (95% confidence interval, 1.56-4.91) lower than the control group (P = 0.001). In conclusion, navigation minimizes postoperative complications, reduces the need for repeat procedures, and helps surgeons with planning, execution, and postoperative assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:1567 / 1573
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPUTER-ASSISTED ORBITAL SURGERY
    KLIMEK, L
    WENZEL, M
    MOSGES, R
    OPHTHALMIC SURGERY AND LASERS, 1993, 24 (06): : 411 - 417
  • [2] Advanced procedures in reconstructive and function-preserving orbital surgery by computer-assisted presurgical planning (CAPP) and computer-assisted surgery (CAS)
    Zizelmann, C
    Schramm, A
    Schön, R
    Ridder, GJ
    Maier, W
    Schipper, J
    Gellrich, NC
    HNO, 2005, 53 (05) : 428 - +
  • [3] Computer-assisted navigational surgery enhances safety in dental implantology
    Ng, FC
    Ho, KH
    Wexler, A
    ANNALS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE SINGAPORE, 2005, 34 (05) : 383 - 388
  • [4] Efficacy of computer-assisted surgery in secondary orbital reconstruction
    Lauer, Guenter
    Pradel, Winnie
    Schneider, Matthias
    Eckelt, Uwe
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2006, 34 (05) : 299 - 305
  • [5] Computer-assisted neurosurgical navigational system for transsphenoidal surgery - Technical note
    Onizuka, M
    Tokunaga, Y
    Shibayama, A
    Miyazaki, H
    NEUROLOGIA MEDICO-CHIRURGICA, 2001, 41 (11) : 565 - 568
  • [6] Dental Outcomes in Computer-Assisted Orthognathic Surgery
    Hamilton, Travis
    Markiewicz, Michael R.
    Jarman, Joseph
    Bell, R. Bryan
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 23 (03) : E223 - E226
  • [7] COMPUTER-ASSISTED SURGERY
    ADAMS, L
    KRYBUS, W
    MEYEREBRECHT, D
    RUEGER, R
    GILSBACH, JM
    MOESGES, R
    SCHLOENDORFF, G
    IEEE COMPUTER GRAPHICS AND APPLICATIONS, 1990, 10 (03) : 43 - 51
  • [8] COMPUTER-ASSISTED SURGERY
    SOHN, N
    ROBBINS, RD
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 312 (14): : 924 - 924
  • [9] Computer-assisted surgery
    Hozack, William J.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2007, 30 (02) : 109 - 110
  • [10] Computer-assisted surgery
    Gebhard, F
    Kinzl, L
    Arand, M
    UNFALLCHIRURG, 2000, 103 (08): : 612 - 617