Comparison of characteristics and function of translation termination signals between and within prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms

被引:45
|
作者
Cridge, Andrew G.
Major, Louise L.
Mahagaonkar, Alhad A.
Poole, Elizabeth S.
Isaksson, Leif A.
Tate, Warren P.
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Dept Biochem, Dunedin, New Zealand
[2] Stockholm Univ, Dept Genet Microbiol & Toxicol, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1093/nar/gkl074
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Six diverse prokaryotic and five eukaryotic genomes were compared to deduce whether the protein synthesis termination signal has common determinants within and across both kingdoms. Four of the six prokaryotic and all of the eukaryotic genomes investigated demonstrated a similar pattern of nucleotide bias both 5' and 3' of the stop codon. A preferred core signal of 4 nt was evident, encompassing the stop codon and the following nucleotide. Codons decoded by hyper-modified tRNAs were over-represented in the region 5' to the stop codon in genes from both kingdoms. The origin of the 3' bias was more variable particularly among the prokaryotic organisms. In both kingdoms, genes with the highest expression index exhibited a strong bias but genes with the lowest expression showed none. Absence of bias in parasitic prokaryotes may reflect an absence of pressure to evolve more efficient translation. Experiments were undertaken to determine if a correlation existed between bias in signal abundance and termination efficiency. In Escherichia coli signal abundance correlated with termination efficiency for UAA and UGA stop codons, but not in mammalian cells. Termination signals that were highly inefficient could be made more efficient by increasing the concentration of the cognate decoding release factor.
引用
收藏
页码:1959 / 1973
页数:15
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] TRANSLATION OF GLOBIN MESSENGER-RNA AMONG EUKARYOTIC AND PROKARYOTIC ORGANISMS
    SCHAPIRA, G
    VAQUERO, C
    BENHAMIDA, F
    DELAUNAY, J
    REIBEL, L
    ACTA BIOLOGICA ET MEDICA GERMANICA, 1974, 33 (5-6) : 945 - 952
  • [2] USAGE OF THE 3 TERMINATION CODONS - COMPILATION AND ANALYSIS OF THE KNOWN EUKARYOTIC AND PROKARYOTIC TRANSLATION TERMINATION SEQUENCES
    KOHLI, J
    GROSJEAN, H
    MOLECULAR & GENERAL GENETICS, 1981, 182 (03): : 430 - 439
  • [3] Structure-function insights into prokaryotic and eukaryotic translation initiation
    Myasnikov, Alexander G.
    Simonetti, Angelita
    Marzi, Stefano
    Klaholz, Bruno P.
    CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (03) : 300 - 309
  • [4] The therapeutic prospect of crosstalk between prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms in the human gut
    Mubaraki, Murad Ali
    Ahmad, Mohammad
    Hafiz, Taghreed A.
    Marie, Mohammed A.
    FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY, 2018, 94 (06)
  • [5] Interplay between termination and translation machinery in eukaryotic selenoprotein synthesis
    Grundner-Culemann, E
    Martin, GW
    Tujebajeva, R
    Harney, JW
    Berry, MJ
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2001, 310 (04) : 699 - 707
  • [6] COMPARISON OF CHARACTERISTICS OF THYMIDYLATE SYNTHASES ISOLATED FROM EUKARYOTIC AND PROKARYOTIC CELLS
    SLAVIKOVA, V
    SLAVIK, K
    MOTYCKA, K
    PRISTOUPILOVA, K
    HOLY, P
    COLLECTION OF CZECHOSLOVAK CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS, 1984, 49 (03) : 743 - +
  • [7] The prokaryotic zinc-finger: structure, function and comparison with the eukaryotic counterpart
    Malgieri, Gaetano
    Palmieri, Maddalena
    Russo, Luigi
    Fattorusso, Roberto
    Pedone, Paolo V.
    Isernia, Carla
    FEBS JOURNAL, 2015, 282 (23) : 4480 - 4496
  • [8] FUNCTIONAL PROKARYOTIC GENE-CONTROL SIGNALS WITHIN A EUKARYOTIC RAINBOW-TROUT PROTAMINE PROMOTER
    JANKOWSKI, JM
    WALCZYK, E
    DIXON, GH
    BIOSCIENCE REPORTS, 1985, 5 (06) : 453 - 461
  • [9] DIFFERENCE IN RNA-BINDING ABILITY BETWEEN EUKARYOTIC AND PROKARYOTIC ELONGATION-FACTORS OF TRANSLATION
    DOMOGATSKY, SP
    VLASIK, TN
    SERYAKOVA, TA
    OVCHINNIKOV, LP
    SPIRIN, AS
    FEBS LETTERS, 1978, 96 (01) : 207 - 210
  • [10] Stop codon selection in eukaryotic translation termination: comparison of the discriminating potential between human and ciliate eRF1s
    Chavatte, L
    Kervestin, S
    Favre, A
    Jean-Jean, O
    EMBO JOURNAL, 2003, 22 (07): : 1644 - 1653