Discrete Sizing and Continuous Shaping Optimisation of Space Trusses using a Hybrid Metaheuristic Method

被引:0
|
作者
Csebfalvi, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pecs, Dept Struct Engn, Pecs, Hungary
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
ANGEL hybrid heuristic method; discrete sizing-shaping truss optimization; GENETIC ALGORITHM; FORCE METHOD;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In this paper, a hybrid metaheuristic method is presented for discrete sizing and continuous shaping truss optimization problems where the structural response variables are implicit functions of the design variables. The proposed hybrid method ANGEL, which has been already introduced for continuous shaping-sizing truss optimization problems combines ant colony optimization (ACO), genetic algorithm (GA), and local search strategy (LS). ACO and GA search alternately and cooperatively in the solution space. The powerful LS algorithm, which is based on the local linearization of the constraint set and the objective function, is applied to yield a better feasible or less unfeasible solution when ACO or GA obtains a solution. According to the discrete nature of the sizing variables, in the LS process a local improvement step is formulated as a mixed integer linear programming problem (MILP). The geometrically nonlinear space structure is formulated as a large displacement structural model. The minimal weight design is subjected to stress, local buckling, and displacement constraints. The combined sizing-shaping truss optimization problems are formulated as geometrically linear and nonlinear discrete optimization problems in terms of cross-sectional design variables, and continuous in terms of shifting variables. The verification of the method is presented trough of a middle size truss bridge optimization problem under moving loads.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Genetic algorithm for discrete-sizing optimal design of trusses using the force method
    Kaveh, A
    Kalatjari, V
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2002, 55 (01) : 55 - 72
  • [2] Geometry and sizing optimisation of discrete structure using the genetic programming method
    Q. Z. Zheng
    O. M. Querin
    D. C. Barton
    [J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2006, 31 : 452 - 461
  • [3] Geometry and sizing optimisation of discrete structure using the genetic programming method
    Zheng, Q. Z.
    Querin, O. M.
    Barton, D. C.
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2006, 31 (06) : 452 - 461
  • [4] Pipe sizing using a hybrid optimisation algorithm
    Kahler, J
    Ulanicki, B
    Pein, K
    [J]. ADVANCES IN WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT, 2003, : 157 - 164
  • [5] Optimization of trusses using genetic algorithms for discrete and continuous variables
    Ghasemi, MR
    Hinton, E
    Wood, RD
    [J]. ENGINEERING COMPUTATIONS, 1999, 16 (2-3) : 272 - 301
  • [6] Sizing, shape, and topology optimizations of roof trusses using hybrid genetic algorithms
    Frans, Richard
    Arfiadi, Yoyong
    [J]. 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE CIVIL ENGINEERING STRUCTURES AND CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, 2014, 95 : 185 - 195
  • [7] Enhanced hybrid metaheuristic algorithms for optimal sizing of steel truss structures with numerous discrete variables
    Saeid Kazemzadeh Azad
    [J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2017, 55 : 2159 - 2180
  • [8] Enhanced hybrid metaheuristic algorithms for optimal sizing of steel truss structures with numerous discrete variables
    Azad, Saeid Kazemzadeh
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2017, 55 (06) : 2159 - 2180
  • [9] Simultaneous Topology, Shape, and Sizing Optimisation of Plane Trusses with Adaptive Ground Finite Elements Using MOEAs
    Noilublao, Norapat
    Bureerat, Sujin
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2013, 2013
  • [10] Optimal Placement and Sizing of Renewable Distributed Generation Using Hybrid Metaheuristic Algorithm
    Radosavljevic, Jordan
    Arsic, Nebojsa
    Milovanovic, Milos
    Ktena, Aphrodite
    [J]. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 2020, 8 (03): : 499 - 510