Understanding the timing and variation of greenhouse gas emissions of forest bioenergy systems

被引:31
|
作者
Roder, Mirjam [1 ]
Thiffault, Evelyne [2 ]
Martinez-Alonso, Celia [3 ]
Senez-Gagnon, Fanny [4 ]
Paradis, Laurence [2 ]
Thornley, Patricia [1 ]
机构
[1] Aston Univ, Sch Engn & Appl Sci, European Bioenergy Res Inst, Supergen Bioenergy Hub, Birmingham B4 7ET, W Midlands, England
[2] Laval Univ, Res Ctr Renewable Mat, Dept Wood & Forest Sci, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada
[3] CETEMAS, Forest & Wood Technol Res Ctr, Sustainable Forest Management Area, Pumarabule S-N, Asturias 33936, Spain
[4] Ctr Forest Res, Ctr Vile Stn, POB 8888, Montreal, PQ H3C 3P8, Canada
来源
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY | 2019年 / 121卷
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Carbon balance; Cumulative emission; Forest bioenergy; Forest management; Greenhouse gas emissions; Lifecycle assessment; Net GHG balance; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; LOBLOLLY-PINE PLANTATIONS; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; TEMPERATE FORESTS; BOREAL FORESTS; CO2; EMISSIONS; KEY ISSUES; BIOMASS; WOOD; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.12.019
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Forest-based bioenergy plays an important role in climate mitigation for limiting global mean temperature increase to below 2 degrees C. The greenhouse gas (GHG) impact of three forest-based bioenergy systems from the USA, Canada and Spain supplying wood pellets for electricity in the UK were evaluated by conducting lifecycle assessments and forest carbon modelling of the three forest systems. Cumulative emissions were analysed by calculating the forest carbon stock change and net GHG emissions balance of the forest-based bioenergy electricity. The analysis considered both the replacement of the existing electricity mix with bioenergy electricity and forest management with and without bioenergy use. The supply chain emissions and forest carbon balances indicated that GHG emission reductions are possible. However, the cumulative net GHG balance at forest landscape scale revealed that the reduction potential is limited, potentially with no GHG reductions in fast growing forests with shorter rotations, while slow growing forest systems with longer rotations result in greater GHG reductions. This means that the maximum climate benefit is delivered at a different point in time for different forest systems. To evaluate the climate change mitigation potential of forest-based bioenergy it is therefore necessary to consider the management, utilisation and relevant counterfactual of the whole forest and its products. In terms of climate change mitigation potential and minimising possible negative impacts that would require multi-level governance.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 114
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Implications of emissions timing on the cost-effectiveness of greenhouse gas mitigation strategies: application to forest bioenergy systems
    McKechnie, Jon
    MacLean, Heather L.
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2014, 6 (04): : 414 - 424
  • [2] Greenhouse gas emissions of forest bioenergy supply and utilization in Finland
    Eero, Jappinen
    Olli-Jussi, Korpinen
    Juha, Laitila
    Tapio, Ranta
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 29 : 369 - 382
  • [3] Trade in bioenergy and greenhouse gas emissions
    Bourgeon, Jean-Marc
    Olliviery, Helene
    [J]. REVUE ECONOMIQUE, 2010, 61 (01): : 183 - 212
  • [4] Forest carbon accounting methods and the consequences of forest bioenergy for national greenhouse gas emissions inventories
    McKechnie, Jon
    Colombo, Steve
    MacLean, Heather L.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2014, 44 : 164 - 173
  • [5] Greenhouse gas emissions of bioenergy systems compared to fossil energy systems -: Methodology and first results
    Jungmeier, G
    Canella, L
    Spitzer, J
    [J]. BIOMASS: A GROWTH OPPORTUNITY IN GREEN ENERGY AND VALUE-ADDED PRODUCTS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1999, : 437 - 444
  • [6] Energy Potential and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Bioenergy Cropping Systems on Marginally Productive Cropland
    Schmer, Marty R.
    Vogel, Kenneth P.
    Varvel, Gary E.
    Follett, Ronald F.
    Mitchell, Robert B.
    Jin, Virginia L.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (03):
  • [7] Tropical forest fragmentation and greenhouse gas emissions
    Laurance, WF
    Laurance, SG
    Delamonica, P
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 1998, 110 (1-3) : 173 - 180
  • [8] Quantifying the legacy of snowmelt timing on soil greenhouse gas emissions in a seasonally dry montane forest
    Blankinship, Joseph C.
    McCorkle, Emma P.
    Meadows, Matthew W.
    Hart, Stephen C.
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2018, 24 (12) : 5933 - 5947
  • [9] Technological change and timing reductions in greenhouse gas emissions
    Faere, Rolf
    Grosskopf, Shawna
    Margaritis, Dimitri
    Weber, William L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2012, 37 (03) : 205 - 216
  • [10] Optimal Timing of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Abatement in Europe
    Sotiriou, Chryso
    Zachariadis, Theodoros
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (10)