The Inconsistency of the h-index

被引:223
|
作者
Waltman, Ludo [1 ]
Van Eck, Nees Jan [2 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Ctr Sci & Technol Studies, NL-2300 AX Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Ctr Sci & Technol Studies, NL-2300 AX Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
HIGHLY CITED PAPERS; HIRSCH-INDEX; BIBLIOMETRIC INDICATORS; SCIENTIFIC IMPACT; RANKINGS;
D O I
10.1002/asi.21678
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The h-index is a popular bibliometric indicator for assessing individual scientists. We criticize the h-index from a theoretical point of view. We argue that for the purpose of measuring the overall scientific impact of a scientist (or some other unit of analysis), the h-index behaves in a counterintuitive way. In certain cases, the mechanism used by the h-index to aggregate publication and citation statistics into a single number leads to inconsistencies in the way in which scientists are ranked. Our conclusion is that the h-index cannot be considered an appropriate indicator of a scientist's overall scientific impact. Based on recent theoretical insights, we discuss what kind of indicators can be used as an alternative to the h-index. We pay special attention to the highly cited publications indicator. This indicator has a lot in common with the h-index, but unlike the h-index it does not produce inconsistent rankings.
引用
收藏
页码:406 / 415
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条