Root iTRAQ protein profile analysis of two Citrus species differing in aluminum-tolerance in response to long-term aluminum-toxicity

被引:41
|
作者
Jiang, Huan-Xin [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Lin-Tong [1 ,3 ]
Qi, Yi-Ping [4 ]
Lu, Yi-Bin [1 ,3 ]
Huang, Zeng-Rong [1 ,3 ]
Chen, Li-Song [1 ,3 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Agr & Forestry Univ, Inst Plant Nutr Physiol & Mol Biol, Fuzhou 350002, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Agr & Forestry Univ, Coll Life Sci, Fuzhou 350002, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Agr & Forestry Univ, Coll Resource & Environm Sci, Fuzhou 350002, Peoples R China
[4] Fujian Acad Med Sci, Inst Mat Med, Fuzhou 350001, Peoples R China
[5] Fujian Agr & Forestry Univ, Higher Educ Key Lab Fujian Prov Soil Ecosyst Hlth, Fuzhou 350002, Peoples R China
[6] Fujian Agr & Forestry Univ, Fujian Key Lab Plant Mol & Cell Biol, Fuzhou 350002, Peoples R China
来源
BMC GENOMICS | 2015年 / 16卷
基金
高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金;
关键词
Aluminum-toxicity; Citrus; iTRAQ; Proteomics; Root; Sulfur metabolism; DIFFERENTIALLY EXPRESSED PROTEINS; STRESS TOLERANCE; TRANSCRIPTOMIC RESPONSES; ARABIDOPSIS-THALIANA; OXIDATIVE STRESS; JASMONIC ACID; AL TOXICITY; GENE; IDENTIFICATION; CYTOSKELETON;
D O I
10.1186/s12864-015-2133-9
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: Limited information is available on aluminum (Al)-toxicity-responsive proteins in woody plant roots. Seedlings of 'Xuegan' (Citrus sinensis) and 'Sour pummelo' (Citrus grandis) were treated for 18 weeks with nutrient solution containing 0 (control) or 1.2 mM AlCl3 center dot 6H(2)O (+Al). Thereafter, we investigated Citrus root protein profiles using isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ). The aims of this work were to determine the molecular mechanisms of plants to deal with Al-toxicity and to identify differentially expressed proteins involved in Al-tolerance. Results: C. sinensis was more tolerant to Al-toxicity than C. grandis. We isolated 347 differentially expressed proteins from + Al Citrus roots. Among these proteins, 202 (96) proteins only presented in C. sinensis (C. grandis), and 49 proteins were shared by the two species. Of the 49 overlapping proteins, 45 proteins were regulated in the same direction upon Al exposure in the both species. These proteins were classified into following categories: sulfur metabolism, stress and defense response, carbohydrate and energy metabolism, nucleic acid metabolism, protein metabolism, cell transport, biological regulation and signal transduction, cell wall and cytoskeleton metabolism, and jasmonic acid (JA) biosynthesis. The higher Al-tolerance of C. sinensis may be related to several factors, including: (a) activation of sulfur metabolism; (b) greatly improving the total ability of antioxidation and detoxification; (c) up-regulation of carbohydrate and energy metabolism; (d) enhancing cell transport; (e) decreased (increased) abundances of proteins involved in protein synthesis (proteiolysis); (f) keeping a better balance between protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation; and (g) increasing JA biosynthesis. Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that metabolic flexibility was more remarkable in C. sinenis than in C. grandis roots, thus improving the Al-tolerance of C. sinensis. This provided the most integrated view of the adaptive responses occurring in Al-toxicity roots.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Root iTRAQ protein profile analysis of two Citrus species differing in aluminum-tolerance in response to long-term aluminum-toxicity
    Huan-Xin Jiang
    Lin-Tong Yang
    Yi-Ping Qi
    Yi-Bin Lu
    Zeng-Rong Huang
    Li-Song Chen
    BMC Genomics, 16
  • [2] The aluminum distribution and translocation in two citrus species differing in aluminum tolerance
    Han Zhang
    Xin-yu Li
    Mei-lan Lin
    Ping-ping Hu
    Ning-wei Lai
    Zeng-rong Huang
    Li-song Chen
    BMC Plant Biology, 22
  • [3] The aluminum distribution and translocation in two citrus species differing in aluminum tolerance
    Zhang, Han
    Xin-yu Li
    Mei-lan Lin
    Ping-ping Hu
    Ning-wei Lai
    Zeng-rong Huang
    Li-song Chen
    BMC PLANT BIOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [4] Aluminum Toxicity-Induced Alterations of Leaf Proteome in Two Citrus Species Differing in Aluminum Tolerance
    Li, Huan
    Yang, Lin-Tong
    Qi, Yi-Ping
    Guo, Peng
    Lu, Yi-Bin
    Chen, Li-Song
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2016, 17 (07)
  • [5] Root Adaptive Responses to Aluminum-Treatment Revealed by RNA-Seq in Two Citrus Species With Different Aluminum-Tolerance
    Guo, Peng
    Qi, Yi-Ping
    Yang, Lin-Tong
    Lai, Ning-Wei
    Ye, Xin
    Yang, Yi
    Chen, Li-Song
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2017, 8
  • [6] Leaf cDNA-AFLP analysis of two citrus species differing in manganese tolerance in response to long-term manganese-toxicity
    Zhou, Chen-Ping
    Qi, Yi-Ping
    You, Xiang
    Yang, Lin-Tong
    Guo, Peng
    Ye, Xin
    Zhou, Xin-Xing
    Ke, Feng-Jiao
    Chen, Li-Song
    BMC GENOMICS, 2013, 14
  • [7] Leaf cDNA-AFLP analysis of two citrus species differing in manganese tolerance in response to long-term manganese-toxicity
    Chen-Ping Zhou
    Yi-Ping Qi
    Xiang You
    Lin-Tong Yang
    Peng Guo
    Xin Ye
    Xin-Xing Zhou
    Feng-Jiao Ke
    Li-Song Chen
    BMC Genomics, 14
  • [8] Mechanisms of aluminum-tolerance in two species of citrus: Secretion of organic acid anions and immobilization of aluminum by phosphorus in roots
    Yang, Lin-Tong
    Jiang, Huan-Xin
    Tang, Ning
    Chen, Li-Song
    PLANT SCIENCE, 2011, 180 (03) : 521 - 530
  • [9] Aluminum effects on photosynthesis, reactive oxygen species and methylglyoxal detoxification in two Citrus species differing in aluminum tolerance
    Guo, Peng
    Qi, Yi-Ping
    Cai, Yan-Tong
    Yang, Tao-Yu
    Yang, Lin-Tong
    Huang, Zeng-Rong
    Chen, Li-Song
    TREE PHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 38 (10) : 1548 - 1565
  • [10] iTRAQ protein profile analysis of Citrus sinensis roots in response to long-term boron-deficiency
    Yang, Lin-Tong
    Qi, Yi-Ping
    Lu, Yi-Bin
    Guo, Peng
    Sang, Wen
    Feng, Hui
    Zhang, Hong-Xing
    Chen, Li-Song
    JOURNAL OF PROTEOMICS, 2013, 93 : 179 - 206