Factors influencing the performance of spray delivery systems: A review of recent developments

被引:1
|
作者
Miller, Paul C. H. [1 ]
Tuck, Clive R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Silsoe Res Inst, Wrest Pk, Bedford MK45 5HS, England
关键词
spray; application; drift; efficacy; droplet size; measurement; wind tunnels; protocols;
D O I
10.1520/STP37474S
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The need for designers and users of pesticide application equipment to balance the risk of off-target contamination with high product efficacies when using the minimum dose of active ingredient has led to the requirement for more data defining the performance of such equipment. Measurements of the droplet size distribution in sprays from conventional nozzles has shown acceptable levels of consistency between data obtained with different measuring systems enabling such sprays to be classified providing that systems are calibrated with agreed reference nozzles. For sprays with air inclusions different measuring systems have been shown to give comparable and consistent results, and there is now a need to fully integrate such sprays into a revised classification scheme. Temperature of both spray liquid and the surrounding air have been shown to influence droplet size distribution measurements. It is therefore proposed that measurement protocols specify a maximum difference in temperature between the spray liquid and surrounding air of 5 degrees C. For boom sprayers it is not possible to predict accurately the risk of drift from droplet size measurements alone because of the complex detrainment mechanisms involved. It is proposed that standardized wind tunnel procedures be defined that enable the relative risk of drift from different nozzle designs to be quantified. In the future it is likely that more of the information relating to application system performance will be delivered pre-programmed in the units control system or as part of a decision support system.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / +
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Recent developments in hormone delivery systems
    Shulman, LP
    Nelson, AL
    Darney, PD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 190 (04) : S39 - S48
  • [2] Delivery systems for platelet derived growth factors in wound healing: A review of recent developments and global patent landscape
    Bhatnagar, Payal
    Law, Jia Xian
    Ng, Shiow-Fern
    JOURNAL OF DRUG DELIVERY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 71
  • [3] Spray drying absorption for desulphurization: a review of recent developments
    L. Koech
    H. Rutto
    L. Lerotholi
    R. C. Everson
    H. Neomagus
    D. Branken
    A. Moganelwa
    Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2021, 23 : 1665 - 1686
  • [4] Spray drying absorption for desulphurization: a review of recent developments
    Koech, L.
    Rutto, H.
    Lerotholi, L.
    Everson, R. C.
    Neomagus, H.
    Branken, D.
    Moganelwa, A.
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2021, 23 (06) : 1665 - 1686
  • [5] OPEN GEAR SPRAY SYSTEMS - RECENT DEVELOPMENTS.
    Gesdorf, Edward J.
    NLGI Spokesman, 1988, 52 (01): : 17 - 28
  • [6] Intra-articular drug delivery systems for the treatment of rheumatic diseases: A review of the factors influencing their performance
    Butoescu, N.
    Jordan, O.
    Doelker, E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 2009, 73 (02) : 205 - 218
  • [7] An Investigation of Factors Influencing Bear Spray Performance
    Smith, Tom S.
    Wilder, James M.
    York, Geoffrey
    Obbard, Martyn E.
    Billings, Blake W.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 85 (01): : 17 - 26
  • [8] Recent developments in retinal lasers and delivery systems
    Yadav, Naresh Kumar
    Jayadev, Chaitra
    Rajendran, Anand
    Nagpal, Manish
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 62 (01) : 50 - 54
  • [9] Recent developments in leishmaniasis vaccine delivery systems
    Bhowmick, Sudipta
    Ali, Nahid
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DELIVERY, 2008, 5 (07) : 789 - 803
  • [10] Recent developments in retroviral gene delivery systems
    Wysocki, PJ
    Grabarczyk, P
    Mackiewicz, A
    EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY, 2001, 1 (06) : 911 - 913