Psychosocial Health Interventions by Social Robots: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:65
|
作者
Robinson, Nicole Lee [1 ,2 ]
Cottier, Timothy Vaughan [2 ]
Kavanagh, David John [2 ]
机构
[1] Australian Ctr Robot Vis, 2 George St, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
social robot; healthcare; treatment; therapy; autism spectrum disorder; dementia; AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS; OLDER-PEOPLE; ASSISTED THERAPY; COMPANION ROBOT; EMBODIED RHYTHM; DEMENTIA; CHILDREN; COMMUNICATION; METAANALYSIS; SEAL;
D O I
10.2196/13203
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Social robots that can communicate and interact with people offer exciting opportunities for improved health care access and outcomes. However, evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on health or well-being outcomes has not yet been clearly synthesized across all health domains where social robots have been tested. Objective: This study aimed to undertake a systematic review examining current evidence from RCTs on the effects of psychosocial interventions by social robots on health or well-being. Methods: Medline, PsycInfo, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Engineering Village searches across all years in the English language were conducted and supplemented by forward and backward searches. The included papers reported RCTs that assessed changes in health or well-being from interactions with a social robot across at least 2 measurement occasions. Results: Out of 408 extracted records, 27 trials met the inclusion criteria: 6 in child health or well-being, 9 in children with autism spectrum disorder, and 12 with older adults. No trials on adolescents, young adults, or other problem areas were identified, and no studies had interventions where robots spontaneously modified verbal responses based on speech by participants. Most trials were small (total N=5 to 415; median=34), only 6 (22%) reported any follow-up outcomes (2 to 12 weeks; median=3.5) and a single-blind assessment was reported in 8 (31%). More recent trials tended to have greater methodological quality. All papers reported some positive outcomes from robotic interventions, although most trials had some measures that showed no difference or favored alternate treatments. Conclusions: Controlled research on social robots is at an early stage, as is the current range of their applications to health care. Research on social robot interventions in clinical and health settings needs to transition from exploratory investigations to include large-scale controlled trials with sophisticated methodology, to increase confidence in their efficacy.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Psychosocial interventions for women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Phimphasone-Brady, Phoutdavone
    Palmer, Brooke
    Vela, Alyssa
    Johnson, Rachel L.
    Harnke, Ben
    Hoffecker, Lilian
    Coons, Helen L.
    Epperson, Neill
    [J]. F&S REVIEWS, 2022, 3 (01): : 42 - 56
  • [2] A systematic review of randomized controlled trials testing the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for gastrointestinal cancers
    Steel J.L.
    Bress K.
    Popichak L.
    Evans J.S.
    Savkova A.
    Biala M.
    Ordos J.
    Carr B.I.
    [J]. Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer, 2014, 45 (2) : 181 - 189
  • [3] Psychosocial interventions in stimulant use disorders: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of randomized controlled trials
    De Giorgi, Riccardo
    Cassar, Carolina
    D'Alo, Gian Loreto
    Ciabattini, Marco
    Minozzi, Silvia
    Economou, Alexis
    Tambelli, Renata
    Lucchese, Franco
    Saulle, Rosella
    Amato, Laura
    Janiri, Luigi
    De Crescenzo, Franco
    [J]. RIVISTA DI PSICHIATRIA, 2018, 53 (05) : 233 - 255
  • [4] Psychosocial interventions to improve sexual functioning in women with cancer: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Carney, Lauren M.
    Schnur, Julie B.
    Morgan, Orly
    Hyun, Christine
    Magin, Zachary E.
    Martin, Lily
    Montgomery, Guy H.
    [J]. SEXUAL MEDICINE REVIEWS, 2024, 12 (02) : 142 - 153
  • [5] Psychosocial interventions for pain management in older adults with dementia: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Pu, Lihui
    Moyle, Wendy
    Jones, Cindy
    Todorovic, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2019, 75 (08) : 1608 - 1620
  • [6] Effectiveness of psychosocial interventions on health outcomes of children with cancer: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    Melesse, Tenaw Gualu
    Chau, Janita Pak Chun
    Nan, M. A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2022, 31 (06)
  • [7] EFFECT OF MOBILE HEALTH INTERVENTIONS ON MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Ahlawat, R.
    Kataria, A.
    Goyal, R.
    Sethi, A.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S242 - S242
  • [8] Randomized controlled trials of mental health nurse-delivered interventions: A systematic review
    Dickens, Geoffrey L.
    Al Maqbali, Mohammed
    Blay, Nicole
    Hallett, Nutmeg
    Ion, Robin
    Lingwood, Louise
    Schoultz, Mariyana
    Tabvuma, Tracy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC AND MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2023, 30 (03) : 341 - 360
  • [9] PSYCHOSOCIAL INTERVENTIONS AND IMMUNE SYSTEM FUNCTION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Spahr, Chandler M.
    Shields, Grant S.
    Slavich, George M.
    [J]. PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2020, 82 (06) : A3 - A3
  • [10] Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of nonpharmacological interventions for fibromyalgia
    Sim, J
    Adams, N
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2002, 18 (05): : 324 - 336