The Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Prostate Cancer Treatment and Survival in the Southern Netherlands

被引:35
|
作者
Aarts, Mieke J.
Koldewijn, Evert L.
Poortmans, Philip M.
Coebergh, Jan Willem W.
Louwman, Marieke
机构
[1] Comprehens Canc Ctr S IKZ, Eindhoven Canc Registry, Dept Res, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Catharina Hosp, Dept Urol, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[3] Reg Study Grp Urol Oncol IKZ, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[4] Inst Verbeeten, Dept Radiat Oncol, Tilburg, Netherlands
[5] Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; COMORBIDITY; RADIOTHERAPY; MANAGEMENT; INEQUALITY; DIAGNOSIS; MORTALITY; PROGRAM; TRENDS; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2012.11.011
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To investigate if socioeconomic status (SES) played a role in the selection of prostate cancer treatment and overall survival. METHODS Treatment and survival by SES of all newly diagnosed patients with prostate cancer (1998-2008) from the population-based Eindhoven Cancer Registry (n = 11,086) were studied. RESULTS Younger patients (< 75) with early stage disease, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-detected stage cT1c, with low SES underwent prostatectomy and brachytherapy less often (10%-16% lower prostatectomy rates in low SES and 0%-7% lower brachytherapy rates in low SES) compared to those with high SES, but underwent more external beam radiotherapy, hormonal therapy, and watchful waiting policy (6%-9%, 5%-7%, and 3%-7% more in lowSES, respectively). This was partially related to the prevalence of comorbidity. The introduction of brachytherapy for localized disease occurred first in high SES patients and these socioeconomic differences were hardly affected by socioeconomic differences in the presence of comorbidities. Overall 10-year survival was superior in high SES patients compared to low SES (localized disease 67% vs 44%, advanced disease 29% vs 20%), and was related to treatment and comorbidity. Multivariable adjusted death rates remained significantly elevated for patients with lowSES, especially cT1c, age < 60 (hazard ratio [HR](low_vs_high_SES) 4.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]1.3-13.7). CONCLUSION SES affected treatment selection and overall survival for patients with prostate cancer in the Southern Netherlands, where treatment guidelines exist and health care is fully covered. Presence of comorbidities only partly contributed to these differences. The relation with other SES-associated factors (eg, ability to understand medical information or to cope with health problems) remains to be explored. UROLOGY 81: 593-601, 2013. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 600
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Prostate Cancer Treatment and Survival in the Southern Netherlands EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Macaluso, Joseph N., Jr.
    UROLOGY, 2013, 81 (03) : 600 - 601
  • [2] Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Prostate Cancer Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis
    Rapiti, Elisabetta
    Fioretta, Gerald
    Schaffar, Robin
    Neyroud-Caspar, Isabel
    Verkooijen, Helena M.
    Schmidlin, Franz
    Miralbell, Raymond
    Zanetti, Roberto
    Bouchardy, Christine
    CANCER, 2009, 115 (23) : 5556 - 5565
  • [3] Interplay of Race, Socioeconomic Status, and Treatment on Survival of Patients With Prostate Cancer
    Schwartz, Kendra
    Powell, Isaac J.
    Underwood, Willie, III
    George, Julie
    Yee, Cecilia
    Banerjee, Mousumi
    UROLOGY, 2009, 74 (06) : 1296 - 1302
  • [4] THE IMPACT OF SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS ON THE SURVIVAL OF MEN WITH EARLY-ONSET PROSTATE CANCER
    Riveros, Carlos
    Chalfant, Victor
    El-Shafie, Ahmed
    Feibus, Allison H.
    Al-Toubat, Mohammed
    Bazargani, Soroush
    Jazayeri, SeyedBehzad
    Bandyk, Mark
    Balaji, K. C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E134 - E135
  • [5] The impact of socioeconomic status on the survival of men with early-onset prostate cancer
    Riveros, Carlos
    Al-Toubat, Mohammed
    Chalfant, Victor
    Elshafei, Ahmed
    Feibus, Allison
    Forero, Ana
    Balaji, K. C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL UROLOGY, 2023, 11 (02): : 146 - 154
  • [6] The impact of socioeconomic status on cancer care and survival
    Wong, S. L.
    Gu, N.
    Banerjee, M.
    Birkmeyer, J. D.
    Birkmeyer, N. J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (15)
  • [7] Impact of socioeconomic status on anal cancer survival.
    Lin, Daniel
    Gold, Heather Taffet
    Schreiber, David
    Leichman, Lawrence P.
    Sherman, Scott
    Becker, Daniel Jacob
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35
  • [8] Impact of socioeconomic status on survival of colorectal cancer patients
    Zhang, Qian
    Wang, Yufu
    Hu, Hanqing
    Huang, Rui
    Xie, Lei
    Liu, Enrui
    Chen, Ying-Gang
    Wang, Guiyu
    Wang, Xishan
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (62) : 106121 - 106131
  • [9] Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Survival for Patients With Anal Cancer
    Lin, Daniel
    Gold, Heather T.
    Schreiber, David
    Leichman, Lawrence P.
    Sherman, Scott E.
    Becker, Daniel J.
    CANCER, 2018, 124 (08) : 1791 - 1797
  • [10] Impact of socioeconomic status on survival in patients with ovarian cancer
    Gardy, Josephine
    Dejardin, Olivier
    Thobie, Alexandre
    Eid, Yassine
    Guizard, Anne-Valerie
    Launoy, Guy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 (04) : 792 - 801