Symbolic Trajectory Evaluation: The Primary Validation Vehicle for Next Generation Intel® Processor Graphics FPU

被引:0
|
作者
KiranKumar, M. Achutha, V [1 ]
Gupta, Aarti [1 ]
Ghughal, Rajnish [1 ]
机构
[1] Intel Corp, Santa Clara, CA 95051 USA
关键词
FORMAL VERIFICATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Formal Verification (FV) is widely acknowledged for improving validation effectiveness. Usually formal verification has been used to supplement more traditional coverage oriented testing activities. Arithmetic Data-path FV has matured over the time to completely replace traditional dynamic validation methodologies. Moreover, it gives an additional promise of 100% data-space coverage. Symbolic Trajectory Evaluation (STE) is the best proven method of FV on Intel (R) data-path designs. The Floating Point Units (FPUs) are generally very data-path intensive. In the next generation Intel Processor Graphics design, the FPU was completely re-architected and this necessitated a methodology which could guarantee complete verification in a tight verification schedule. STE was brought in to meet this formidable target. This paper discusses the efficient application of this methodology to achieve convincing results. More than 201 bugs were caught in a very short verification cycle using STE.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 156
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Cascade Lake: Next Generation Intel Xeon Scalable Processor
    Arafa, Mohamed
    Fahim, Bahaa
    Kottapalli, Sailesh
    Kumar, Akhilesh
    Looi, Lily P.
    Mandava, Sreenivas
    Rudoff, Andy
    Steiner, Ian M.
    Valentine, Bob
    Vedaraman, Geetha
    Vora, Sujal
    [J]. IEEE MICRO, 2019, 39 (02) : 29 - 36
  • [2] A critical evaluation of the Next Generation Simulation (NGSIM) vehicle trajectory dataset
    Coifman, Benjamin
    Li, Lizhe
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2017, 105 : 362 - 377
  • [3] Penryn:: 45-nm next generation Intel® Core™ 2 processor
    George, Varghese
    Jahagirdar, Sanjeev
    Tong, Chao
    Smits, Ken
    Damaraju, Satish
    Siers, Scott
    Naydenov, Ves
    Khondker, Tanveer
    Sarkar, Sanjib
    Singh, Puneet
    [J]. 2007 IEEE ASIAN SOLID-STATE CIRCUITS CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS OF TECHNICAL PAPERS, 2007, : 14 - 17
  • [4] Power Reduction Schemes in Next Generation Intel® ATOM™ Processor Based SoC for Handheld Applications
    Islam, Rabiul
    Sabbavarapu, Anil
    Patel, Rajesh
    [J]. 2010 SYMPOSIUM ON VLSI CIRCUITS, DIGEST OF TECHNICAL PAPERS, 2010, : 173 - 174
  • [5] Memory scalability evaluation of the next-generation Intel Bensley platform with InfiniBand
    Koop, Matthew J.
    Huang, Wei
    Vishnu, Abhinav
    Panda, Dhabaleswar K.
    [J]. 14TH IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON HIGH-PERFORMANCE INTERCONNECTS, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 52 - +
  • [6] Designing Next Generation Clusters: Evaluation of InfiniBand DDR/QDR on Intel Computing Platforms
    Subramoni, Hari
    Koop, Matthew
    Panda, Dhabaleswar K.
    [J]. 2009 17TH IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON HIGH-PERFORMANCE INTERCONNECTS (HOTI 2009), 2009, : 112 - 120
  • [7] Next Generation X-in-the-Loop Validation Methodology for Automated Vehicle Systems
    Szalay, Zsolt
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 35616 - 35632
  • [8] Physics Engine on Reconfigurable Processor - Low Power Optimized Solution empowering Next-Generation Graphics on Embedded Platforms
    Bose, Manti
    Rajagopala, Vasanthakumar
    [J]. 2012 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER GAMES (CGAMES), 2012, : 138 - 142
  • [9] On the assessment of vehicle trajectory data accuracy and application to the Next Generation SIMulation (NGSIM) program data
    Punzo, Vincenzo
    Borzacchiello, Maria Teresa
    Ciuffo, Biagio
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 19 (06) : 1243 - 1262
  • [10] TRIBuTETM board and platform test methodology:: Intel's next-generation test and validation methodology for platforms
    Nejedlo, JJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL TEST CONFERENCE 2003, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 783 - 783