The proboscis extension reflex to evaluate learning and memory in honeybees (Apis mellifera): some caveats

被引:27
|
作者
Frost, Elisabeth H. [1 ]
Shutler, Dave [1 ]
Hillier, Neil Kirk [1 ]
机构
[1] Acadia Univ, Dept Biol, Wolfville, NS B4P 2R6, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Apis mellifera; Classical conditioning; Honeybee; Learning; Proboscis extension reflex; CLASSICAL CONDITIONED-RESPONSE; DIVISION-OF-LABOR; OLFACTORY MEMORY; COLOR DISCRIMINATION; ODOR DISCRIMINATION; SHORT-TERM; NEURAL REPRESENTATION; INTERTRIAL INTERVAL; SUBLETHAL EXPOSURE; ANTENNAL LOBE;
D O I
10.1007/s00114-012-0955-8
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The proboscis extension reflex (PER) is widely used in a classical conditioning (Pavlovian) context to evaluate learning and memory of a variety of insect species. The literature is particularly prodigious for honeybees (Apis mellifera) with more than a thousand publications. Imagination appears to be the only limit to the types of challenges to which researchers subject honeybees, including all the sensory modalities and a broad diversity of environmental treatments. Accordingly, some remarkable insights have been achieved using PER. However, there are several challenges to evaluating the PER literature that warrant a careful and thorough review. We assess here variation in methods that makes interpretation of studies, even those researching the same question, tenuous. We suggest that the numerous variables that might influence experimental outcomes from PER be thoroughly detailed by researchers. Moreover, the influence of individual variables on results needs to carefully evaluated, as well as among two or more variables. Our intent is to encourage investigation of the influence of numerous variables on PER results.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 686
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条