Simulation study of the symmetry-breaking instability and the dipole field reversal in a rotating spherical shell dynamo

被引:22
|
作者
Nishikawa, N. [1 ]
Kusano, K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Japan Agcy Marine Earth Sci & Technol, Super Comp Syst Planning & Operat Dept, Kanazawa Ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2360001, Japan
[2] Japan Agcy Marine Earth Sci & Technol, Earth Simulator Ctr, Kanazawa Ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2360001, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
D O I
10.1063/1.2959120
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
The reversal mechanism of a dipole magnetic field generated by dynamo action in a rotating spherical shell is investigated by a three-dimensional nonlinear magnetohydrodynamic simulation as well as a linear stability analysis. The emphasis of the study is on understanding the relationship between dipole reversal and the symmetry properties of the dynamo solution. As a result, first, it is found that there is a threshold of the magnetic Prandtl number, below which the dipole field is never reversed, and above which the reversal occurs at irregular intervals like the paleomagnetic evolution of the geodynamo. Second, it is shown that the dynamo process responsible for the generation of a dipole field (called "a-dynamo" in this paper) consists only of the antimirror symmetric magnetic field and the mirror symmetric velocity field with respect to the equatorial plane. Third, it is found that the components of the opposite symmetry to the a-dynamo grow only during the polarity reversal events and quickly decay afterwards. This indicates that the dipole field reversal and the loss of equatorial symmetry are tightly connected. In fact, it is clearly demonstrated by numerical analyses that the a-dynamo process is linearly unstable for the perturbation of opposite symmetry when the magnetic Prandtl number exceeds the threshold for dipole reversal. Mode coupling between the longitudinal Fourier components plays a crucial role in creating the instability. Based on the above results, it is proposed that symmetry-breaking instability could be the mechanism for dipole field reversal in the geodynamo process. The energy conversion between components of different symmetry is also analyzed in the quasistable polarity phase and in the polarity reversal phase, respectively. (C) 2008 American Institute of Physics.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Dipole and octapole field reversals in a rotating spherical shell: Magnetohydrodynamic dynamo simulation
    Ochi, MM
    Kageyama, A
    Sato, T
    [J]. PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 1999, 6 (03) : 777 - 787
  • [3] SIMULATION STUDY OF A MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMIC DYNAMO - CONVECTION IN A ROTATING SPHERICAL-SHELL
    KAGEYAMA, A
    WATANABE, K
    SATO, T
    [J]. PHYSICS OF FLUIDS B-PLASMA PHYSICS, 1993, 5 (08): : 2793 - 2805
  • [4] GeoFlow: On symmetry-breaking bifurcations of heated spherical shell convection
    Bergemann, K.
    Feudel, F.
    Tuckerman, L. S.
    [J]. 15TH INTERNATIONAL COUETTE-TAYLOR WORKSHOP, 2008, 137
  • [5] SPATIAL SYMMETRY-BREAKING IN RAPIDLY ROTATING CONVECTIVE SPHERICAL-SHELLS
    ZHANG, KK
    SCHUBERT, G
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1995, 22 (10) : 1265 - 1268
  • [6] A STUDY OF INSTABILITY TO ELECTRICAL SYMMETRY-BREAKING IN UNICELLULAR SYSTEMS
    LARTER, R
    ORTOLEVA, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1982, 96 (02) : 175 - 200
  • [7] Mercury's anomalous magnetic field caused by a symmetry-breaking self-regulating dynamo
    Takahashi, Futoshi
    Shimizu, Hisayoshi
    Tsunakawa, Hideo
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 10 (1)
  • [8] Mercury’s anomalous magnetic field caused by a symmetry-breaking self-regulating dynamo
    Futoshi Takahashi
    Hisayoshi Shimizu
    Hideo Tsunakawa
    [J]. Nature Communications, 10
  • [9] Impurity-induced magnetic field in time-reversal symmetry-breaking superconductors
    Choi, CH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 2002, 40 (03) : 480 - 483
  • [10] MAGNETIC-FIELD REVERSAL RESULTING FROM A DYNAMO PROCESS IN A SPHERICAL-SHELL
    HONKURA, Y
    IIJIMA, T
    MATSUSHIMA, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOMAGNETISM AND GEOELECTRICITY, 1992, 44 (10): : 931 - 941