The environmental and economic effects of regional bioenergy policy in the southeastern US

被引:20
|
作者
Galik, Christopher S. [1 ]
Abt, Robert C. [2 ]
Latta, Gregory [3 ]
Vegh, Tibor [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Nicholas Inst Environm Policy Solut, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Forestry & Environm Resources, Coll Nat Resources, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[3] Oregon State Univ, Coll Forestry, Dept Forest Engn Resources & Management, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
关键词
Renewable portfolio standard; Biomass; FASOMGHG; SRTS; Forest carbon; FOREST BIOMASS; MARKETS; CARBON; TIMBER; WOOD; ELECTRICITY; PRODUCTS; DEMAND; ENERGY; SECTOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2015.05.018
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The unique generation, landownership, and resource attributes of the southeastern United States make the region an important test bed for implementation of novel renewable energy policy interventions. This study evaluates the environmental and economic implications of one such intervention, a hypothetical region-wide renewable portfolio standard (RPS) with biomass carve-outs. It utilizes the Forest and Agriculture Sector Optimization Model with Greenhouse Gases (FASOMGHG) to assess the multi-sector and interregional allocation of forest harvest activity, and then uses the Sub-Regional Timber Supply (SRTS) model to assess intraregional variation in forest composition and greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation potential. The analysis finds that existing resource conditions influence the regional distribution of land use and harvest changes, resulting in a spatially and temporally diverse forest carbon response. Net forest carbon in the Southeast is greater in the RPS Scenario than in the No RPS Scenario in all but the final years of the model run. Accounting for displaced fossil emissions yields net GHG reductions in all time periods. Both research methodology and findings are also applicable to a broader suite of domestic and international policies, including European Union renewable energy initiatives and GHG mitigation under Section 111 of the U.S. Clean Air Act. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 346
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF REGIONAL POLICY
    Gajewski, Pawel
    [J]. GOSPODARKA NARODOWA, 2007, (1-2): : 59 - 81
  • [2] Game of Regional Environmental Policy: Europe and US
    Asproudis, Elias
    Khan, Nadeem
    Korac-Kakabadse, Nada
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRY COMPETITION & TRADE, 2019, 19 (01): : 1 - 20
  • [3] Game of Regional Environmental Policy: Europe and US
    Elias Asproudis
    Nadeem Khan
    Nada Korac-Kakabadse
    [J]. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 2019, 19 : 1 - 20
  • [4] Incentivising bioenergy production: Economic and environmental insights from a regional optimization methodology
    Balaman, Sebnem Yilmaz
    Scott, James
    Matopoulos, Aristides
    Wright, Daniel G.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 130 : 867 - 880
  • [5] Bioenergy production and use: Comparative analysis of the economic and environmental effects
    Hennig, Christiane
    Gawor, Marek
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 63 : 130 - 137
  • [6] EVALUATING EFFECTS OF BRITISH REGIONAL ECONOMIC POLICY
    MOORE, B
    RHODES, J
    [J]. ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1973, 83 (329): : 87 - 110
  • [7] Economic Valuation of Tatras National Park and Regional Environmental Policy
    Fuezyova, L.
    Lanikova, A.
    Novorolsky, M.
    [J]. POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2009, 18 (05): : 811 - 818
  • [8] Variation in regional and landscape effects on occupancy of temperate bats in the southeastern US
    Neece, Benjamin D.
    Loeb, Susan C.
    Jachowski, David S.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (11):
  • [9] Environmental and economic evaluation of bioenergy in Ontario, Canada
    Zhang, Yimin
    Habibi, Shiva
    'MacLean, Heather L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2007, 57 (08) : 919 - 933
  • [10] EVALUATING EFFECTS OF REGIONAL ECONOMIC-POLICY - CRITIQUE
    DESSANT, JW
    SMART, R
    [J]. REGIONAL STUDIES, 1977, 11 (03) : 147 - 152