Mange-free hog farms - Sanitation concepts, certification approaches and cost-benefit analyses

被引：0
|
作者：
Rambags, P [1 ]
机构：
[1] Tierarzt, NL-7400 AA Deventer, Netherlands
来源：
PRAKTISCHE TIERARZT | 2004年 / 85卷 / 03期
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
S85 [动物医学（兽医学）];
学科分类号：
0906 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：198 / +
页数：5
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] SIMPLIFIED APPROACHES TO COST-BENEFIT ANALYSES
    PAPAMARC.J
    POWER ENGINEERING, 1973, 77 (11) : 16 - 16
  • [2] Carbon emission reduction and cost-benefit of methane digester systems on hog farms in China
    Chen, T.
    Liu, M.
    Takahashi, Y.
    Mullen, J. D.
    Ames, G. C. W.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 59 (06) : 948 - 966
  • [3] Yield and cost-benefit analyses for apple scab sanitation practices in integrated and organic apple management systems
    Antal, Gabriella
    Szabo, Szilard
    Szarvas, Peter
    Holb, Imre J.
    PLANTS PEOPLE PLANET, 2024, 6 (02) : 470 - 489
  • [4] AN ECONOMIC CONCEPT FOR EVALUATION OF TREATMENTS IN CATTLE FARMING - NEW APPROACHES TO COST-BENEFIT ANALYSES
    WALTER, K
    PRAKTISCHE TIERARZT, 1993, 74 (07): : 649 - 652
  • [5] The concepts of "severe suffering" of experimental animals and "essential needs of man and animal" as used in cost-benefit analyses
    Stafleu, F
    Vorstenbosch, J
    Tramper, R
    de Jong, M
    Eckelboom, E
    Krijger, F
    PROGRESS IN THE REDUCTION, REFINEMENT AND REPLACEMENT OF ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION, 2000, 31 : 835 - 839
  • [6] Cost-inclusive evaluation: A banquet of approaches for including costs, benefits, and cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses in your next evaluation
    Yates, Brian T.
    EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2009, 32 (01) : 52 - 54
  • [7] Opportunities for short rotation coppice production on free-range chicken farms in Flanders: farmers' perceptions and cost-benefit analysis
    Stadig, Lisanne M.
    Tuyttens, Frank A. M.
    Rodenburg, T. Bas
    Verdonckt, Pieter
    Wauters, Erwin
    Borremans, Lieve
    Reubens, Bert
    RENEWABLE AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SYSTEMS, 2020, 35 (03) : 286 - 295
1