Steady-state visual evoked potential and its applications in studying visual selective attention

被引:1
|
作者
Chen, Xiaoyu [1 ]
Cheng, Zijian [1 ]
Hu, Chengmi [1 ]
Liang, Tengfei [1 ]
Liu, Qiang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Liaoning Normal Univ, Res Ctr Brain & Cognit Neurosci, Dalian 116029, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Normal Univ, Inst Brain & Psychol Sci, Chengdu 610000, Peoples R China
来源
CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN-CHINESE | 2020年 / 65卷 / 24期
关键词
steady-state visual evoked potential; visual selective attention; frequency tagging; attention resource; ALPHA OSCILLATIONS; NEURAL RESPONSES; HZ FLICKER; SUPPRESSION; ENTRAINMENT; FREQUENCY; FEATURES; CAPTURE; SEARCH; CORTEX;
D O I
10.1360/TB-2020-0009
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP), an evoked brain potential, possesses the same frequency as periodic visual stimuli evoking potentials. It is extensively utilized in Brain-Computer Interface and human cognitive research. Moreover, the amplitude of SS VEP is sensitive to resources allocation of visual selective attention, and therefore can always serve as a corresponding electrophysiological indicator. In comparison with event-related potentials (ERPs) presented by P300 and N2pc, SS VEP index can be flexibly applied to a variety of paradigms and avoid errors caused by the brain lateralization as different items can be present in the center or in the same region of the view. Furthermore, SS VEP can reflect attention variation because of its continuity and sensibility to attention fluctuation. Besides, ERPs and SSVEP may reflect diverse attentive stages, and certain evidence suggests the attentive stage that SSVEP reflects is earlier compared with ERPs. Specifically, SSVEP may reflect the regulation that brain regions in charge of advanced cognitive function act on the visual cortex or the earlier stage of visual attention. Nevertheless, ERPs might reveal a later stage accomplished by brain regions responsible for higher-order cognitive processes such as the parietal lobe. In the study of visual selective attention, the frequency tagging is primarily employed to induce SSVEP. Visual stimuli are presented periodically at various frequencies to evoke SS VEP so that the stimuli are frequency tagged. We are able to figure out the allocation of attentive resources in those conditions by means of comparing SS VEP amplitude that the same stimulus evokes in a wide range of conditions. The frequency tagging is particularly appropriate to visual selective attention, especially feature-based and space-based attention. Benefiting from its accurate and sensitive reflection of attentive spatial distribution, SSVEP-based frequency tagging is widely adopted in space-based attention and directly proves the attention focus is shape-flexible and dividable but not always a solid circle. On the other hand, researchers developed the random dot kinematograms (RDK) paradigm for feature-based attention, which prolongs instantaneous feature-based attention process so that SS VEP can detect it. With RDK paradigm, researchers find strong evidence that feature-based attention does exist and has a global attentive activation. However, the other kind of visual selective attention, object-based attention. cannot be explored by frequency tagging because periodic flicker will be a highlighted feature so that participants will consider it as an object recognition marker and further destroy the integrity of the object. In the future, researchers can attempt to add emotion, reward and punishment. and working memory representations as research variables. or to build connections between feature-based attention and spatial-based attention in the process of using SS VEP to explore visual selective attention. In addition, the results of BC! algorithms for SS VEP have a potential for being a new visual selective attention index.
引用
收藏
页码:2601 / 2614
页数:14
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [1] Classification of Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia Using Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential Based Features
    Alimardani, Fatemeh
    Cho, Jae-Hyun
    Boostaniy, Reza
    Hwang, Han-Jeong
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 : 40379 - 40388
  • [2] American Clinical Neurophysiology Society, 2006, J Clin Neurophysiol, V23, P138
  • [3] Behavioral performance follows the time course of neural facilitation and suppression during cued shifts of feature-selective attention
    Andersen, S. K.
    Mueller, M. M.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (31) : 13878 - 13882
  • [4] Attentional Selection of Feature Conjunctions Is Accomplished by Parallel and Independent Selection of Single Features
    Andersen, Soren K.
    Mueller, Matthias M.
    Hillyard, Steven A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 35 (27): : 9912 - 9919
  • [5] Attention to a threat-related feature does not interfere with concurrent attentive feature selection
    Boylan, Maeve R.
    Kelly, Mia N.
    Thigpen, Nina N.
    Keil, Andreas
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 56 (06)
  • [6] Time matters: Feature-specific prioritization follows feature integration in visual object processing
    Brummerloh, Berit
    Mueller, Matthias M.
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2019, 196 : 81 - 93
  • [7] Attentional Facilitation of Constituent Features of an Object Does Not Spread Automatically along Object-defining Cortical Boundaries
    Brummerloh, Berit
    Gundlach, Christopher
    Mueller, Matthias M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 31 (02) : 278 - 287
  • [8] Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials Can Be Explained by Temporal Superposition of Transient Event-Related Responses
    Capilla, Almudena
    Pazo-Alvarez, Paula
    Darriba, Alvaro
    Campo, Pablo
    Gross, Joachim
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (01):
  • [10] Object-based attention: A tutorial review
    Chen, Zhe
    [J]. ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2012, 74 (05) : 784 - 802