Security Proofs for Participation Privacy, Receipt-Freeness and Ballot Privacy for the Helios Voting Scheme

被引:13
|
作者
Bernhard, David [1 ]
Kulyk, Oksana [2 ]
Volkamer, Melanie [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Bristol, Avon, England
[2] Tech Univ Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
[3] Karlstad Univ, Karlstad, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1145/3098954.3098990
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The Helios voting scheme is well studied including formal proofs for verifiability and ballot privacy. However, depending on its version, the scheme provides either participation privacy (hiding who participated in the election) or verifiability against malicious bulletin board (preventing election manipulation by ballot stuffing), but not both at the same time. It also does not provide receipt-freeness, thus enabling vote buying by letting the voters construct receipts proving how they voted. Recently, an extension to Helios, further referred to as KTV-Helios, has been proposed that claims to provide these additional security properties. However, the authors of KTV-Helios did not prove their claims. Our contribution is to provide formal definitions for participation privacy and receipt-freeness that we applied to KTV-Helios. In order to evaluate the fulfillment of participation privacy and receipt-freeness, we furthermore applied the existing definition of ballot privacy, which was also used for evaluating the security of Helios, in order to show that ballot privacy also holds for KTV-Helios.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Proxy Voting Scheme Ensuring Participation Privacy and Receipt-Freeness
    Kulyk, Oksana
    Volkamer, Melanie
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 52ND ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2019, : 2842 - 2851
  • [2] An efficient mixnet-based voting scheme providing receipt-freeness
    Aditya, R
    Lee, B
    Boyd, C
    Dawson, E
    [J]. TRUST AND PRIVACY IN DIGITAL BUSINESS, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 3184 : 152 - 161
  • [3] Towards a Mechanized Proof of Selene Receipt-Freeness and Vote-Privacy
    Bruni, Alessandro
    Drewsen, Eva
    Schurmann, Carsten
    [J]. ELECTRONIC VOTING (E-VOTE-ID 2017), 2017, 10615 : 110 - 126
  • [4] Verifiable E-Voting System with Receipt-Freeness
    Badr, Marwa Mahmoud
    Sarhan, Amany Mahmoud
    Abdulkader, Hatem
    [J]. 2014 10TH INTERNATIONAL COMPUTER ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (ICENCO), 2014, : 42 - 47
  • [5] A Formal Logic Framework for Receipt-freeness in Internet Voting Protocol
    Meng, Bo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS, 2009, 4 (03) : 184 - 192
  • [6] A Critique of Game-Based Definitions of Receipt-Freeness for Voting
    Fraser, Ashley
    Quaglia, Elizabeth A.
    Smyth, Ben
    [J]. PROVABLE SECURITY, PROVSEC 2019, 2019, 11821 : 189 - 205
  • [7] Providing receipt-freeness in mixnet-based voting protocols
    Lee, B
    Boyd, C
    Dawson, E
    Kim, K
    Yang, J
    Yoo, S
    [J]. INFORMATION SECURITY AND CRYPTOLOGY - ICISC 2003, 2004, 2971 : 245 - 258
  • [8] Receipt-Freeness for Groth's e-Voting Schemes
    Han, Wei
    Chen, Ke-Fei
    Zheng, Dong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2009, 25 (02) : 517 - 530
  • [9] Adapting Helios for Provable Ballot Privacy
    Bernhard, David
    Cortier, Veronique
    Pereira, Olivier
    Smyth, Ben
    Warinschi, Bogdan
    [J]. COMPUTER SECURITY - ESORICS 2011, 2011, 6879 : 335 - +
  • [10] Analysis of receipt-freeness in the internet voting protocol with applied pi calculus
    Meng, Bo
    [J]. Journal of Computational Information Systems, 2010, 6 (08): : 2727 - 2732