Genetic evaluation of calving to first insemination using natural and artificial insemination mating data

被引:0
|
作者
Donoghue, KA [1 ]
Rekaya, R [1 ]
Bertrand, JK [1 ]
Misztal, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Anim & Dairy Sci, Edgar L Rhodes Ctr Anim & Dairy Sci, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
beef cattle; female fertility; threshold models;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Mating and calving records for 51,084 first-parity heifers in Australian Angus herds were used to examine the relationship between probability of calving to first insemination (CFI) in artificial insemination and natural service (NS) mating data. Calving to first insemination was defined as a binary trait for both sources of data. Two Bayesian models were employed: 1) a bivariate threshold model with CFI in AI data regarded as a trait separate from CFI in NS data and 2) a univariate threshold model with CFI regarded as the same trait for both sources of data. Posterior means (SD) of additive variance in the bivariate analysis were similar: 0.049 (0.013) and 0.075 (0.021) for CFI in AI and NS data, respectively, indicating lack of heterogeneity for this parameter. A similar trend was observed for heritability in the bivariate analysis, with posterior means (SD) of 0.025 (0.007) and 0.048 (0.012) for AI and NS data, respectively. The posterior means (SD) of the additive covariance and corresponding genetic correlation between the traits were 0.048 (0.006) and 0.821 (0.138), respectively. Differences were observed between posterior means for herd-year variance: 0.843 vs. 0.280 for AI and NS data, respectively, which may reflect the higher incidence of 100% conception rates within a herd-year class (extreme category problem) in AI data. Parameter estimates under the univariate model were close to the weighted average of the corresponding parameters under the bivariate model. Posterior means (SD) for additive, herd-year, and service sire variance and heritability under the univariate model were 0.063 (0.007), 0.56 (0.029), 0.131 (0.013), and 0.036 (0.007), respectively. These results indicate that, genetically, cows with a higher probability of CFI when mated using AI also have a high probability of CFI when mated via NS. The high correlation between the two traits, along with the lack of heterogeneity for the additive variance, implies that a common additive variance could be used for AI and NS data. A single-trait analysis of CFI with heterogeneous variances for herd-year and service sire could be implemented. The low estimates of heritability indicate that response to selection for probability of calving to first insemination would be expected to be low.
引用
收藏
页码:362 / 367
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ARTIFICIAL-INSEMINATION OR NATURAL MATING - WHICH IS BETTER
    OSTERLUND, E
    AMERICAN BEE JOURNAL, 1983, 123 (04): : 291 - 292
  • [2] COMPARISON BETWEEN NATURAL MATING AND ARTIFICIAL-INSEMINATION IN SWINE
    DASILVEIRA, PRS
    MUNARI, J
    SOBESTIANSKY, J
    WENTZ, I
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 1986, 21 (03) : 311 - 316
  • [3] Productivity of rabbit does subjected to artificial insemination and natural mating
    Alabiso, M
    Bonanno, A
    Alicata, ML
    Leto, G
    Todaro, M
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH WORLD RABBIT CONGRESS, VOLS 1-3: VOL 1: NUTRITION, WOOL & FUR; VOL 2: REPRODUCTION & REPRODUCTION PHYSIOLOGY - GENETICS & SELECTION - GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY - ETHOLOGY & WELFARE; VOL 3: PATHOLOGY & PROPHYLAXIS - GROWTH & MEAT - MANAGEMENT & PRODUCTION, 1998, : B29 - B32
  • [4] CORTISOL RESPONSE IN HEIFERS TO ARTIFICIAL-INSEMINATION, NATURAL MATING, AND NO MATING AT ESTRUS
    MACAULAY, AS
    ROUSSEL, JD
    SEYBT, SH
    THERIOGENOLOGY, 1986, 26 (01) : 117 - 123
  • [5] COMPARISON OF NATURAL SERVICE AND ARTIFICIAL-INSEMINATION IN SEASONALLY CALVING DAIRY HERDS
    OFARRELL, KJ
    IRISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1977, 16 (03): : 251 - 257
  • [6] Fertility of chickens in the production of pedigree chicks by natural mating and artificial insemination
    Custodio, RWS
    Savino, VJM
    Coelho, AAD
    REVISTA DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA-JOURNAL OF THE BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1996, 25 (06): : 1074 - 1085
  • [7] ARTIFICIAL-INSEMINATION VS NATURAL MATING IN CAPTIVE AMERICAN KESTRELS
    BIRD, DM
    LAGUE, PC
    BUCKLAND, RB
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE, 1976, 54 (07): : 1183 - 1191
  • [8] SPERM STORAGE AND TRANSPORT FOLLOWING NATURAL MATING AND ARTIFICIAL-INSEMINATION
    BRILLARD, JP
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 1993, 72 (05) : 923 - 928
  • [9] Artificial insemination on natural heat
    Bister, JL
    Cosier, V
    Daraban, S
    Pirotte, P
    Bulletin of the University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Vol 60: ANIMAL SCIENCE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2004, 60 : 393 - 393
  • [10] GENETIC VARIABILITY AND ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION
    RENDEL, JM
    ROBERTSON, A
    NATURE, 1951, 167 (4243) : 320 - 320