Hybrid revascularization in multivessel coronary artery disease

被引:43
|
作者
Repossini, Alberto [1 ,2 ]
Tespili, Maurizio [1 ,2 ]
Saino, Antonio [1 ,2 ]
Kotelnikov, Igor [1 ,2 ]
Moggi, Annalisa [1 ,2 ]
Di Bacco, Lorenzo [1 ,2 ]
Muneretto, Claudio [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Brescia, Dept Cardiac Surg, I-25123 Brescia, Italy
[2] Bolognini Hosp, Cardiol Unit, Seriate, Italy
关键词
Hybrid revascularization; Multivessel coronary disease; MIDCAB; Drug-eluting stent; DRUG-ELUTING STENTS; BYPASS SURGERY; ANGIOPLASTY; SOCIETY; RISK;
D O I
10.1093/ejcts/ezt016
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive hybrid revascularization (MIHR) by means of the left mammary artery on the left anterior descending artery [minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB)] combined with percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) stenting may be an alternative to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting through sternotomy or multiple PCI. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the long-term outcomes of this strategy. METHODS: Since May 1997 up to January 2011, 810 MIDCAB have been performed as isolated revascularization in 644 patients. Since 2004, MIDCAB, as a part of hybrid revascularization, was associated with PCI in 166 patients. RESULTS: In the MIDCAB group, mean age was 64.6 +/- 12.0, with 83.8% males. Two-vessel disease was 62.4%, three-vessel disease 37.6%. Overall mortality was 0.24%, perioperative acute myocardial infarction-1.6%, early reoperation-0.74%, reopening for bleeding-1.2%, case rate of haemotrasfusion-3.1%, with a mean hospital postoperative stay of 4 +/- 2.5 days. Postoperative angiographic control prior to PCI and in symptomatic patients showed patent left internal mammary artery in 100% of cases. PCI was performed in 166 patients, 64.2% before MIDCAB and 35.8% after surgery (interval 2.2 +/- 1.3 months). The mean follow-up in the MIDCAB group was 8.4 +/- 3.2 years. In the MIHR group, at the mean follow-up of 4.5 +/- 2.3 years, freedom from related cardiac death was 93% with freedom from cardiac reintervention of 83%. CONCLUSIONS: Our 13-year experience with MIDCAB demonstrates that the operation is safe and associated with a very low incidence of early and late complications. The hybrid approach provided excellent long-term outcome in terms of freedom from cardiac death and reoperation. Accurate patient selection, as well the timing of the hybrid procedure, is mandatory to optimize surgical and PCI results.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 294
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hybrid Revascularization for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
    Gasior, Mariusz
    Zembala, Michael Oscar
    Tajstra, Mateusz
    Filipiak, Krzysztof
    Gierlotka, Marek
    Hrapkowicz, Tomasz
    Hawranek, Michal
    Polonski, Lech
    Zembala, Marian
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2014, 7 (11) : 1277 - 1283
  • [2] Hybrid coronary revascularization for multivessel coronary artery disease
    Hu, Shengshou
    Gao, Runlin
    [J]. CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2014, 25 (03) : 258 - 265
  • [4] Hybrid coronary revascularization for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease
    Kayatta, Michael O.
    Halkos, Michael E.
    Puskas, John D.
    [J]. ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2018, 7 (04) : 500 - 505
  • [5] Hybrid coronary revascularization in multivessel coronary artery disease: a systematic review
    Nenna, Antonio
    Nappi, Francesco
    Spadaccio, Cristiano
    Greco, Salvatore Matteo
    Pilato, Michele
    Stilo, Francesco
    Montelione, Nunzio
    Catanese, Vincenzo
    Lusini, Mario
    Spinelli, Francesco
    Chello, Massimo
    [J]. FUTURE CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) : 219 - 234
  • [6] Completeness of revascularization in multivessel coronary artery disease
    Sandoval, Yader
    Brilakis, Emmanouil S.
    Garcia, Santiago
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2016, 8 (11) : E1493 - E1496
  • [7] Hybrid Coronary Revascularization for the Treatment of Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease A Multicenter Observational Study
    Puskas, John D.
    Halkos, Michael E.
    DeRose, Joseph J.
    Bagiella, Emilia
    Miller, Marissa A.
    Overbey, Jessica
    Bonatti, Johannes
    Srinivas, V. S.
    Vesely, Mark
    Sutter, Francis
    Lynch, Janine
    Kirkwood, Katherine
    Shapiro, Timothy A.
    Boudoulas, Konstantinos D.
    Crestanello, Juan
    Gehrig, Thomas
    Smith, Peter
    Ragosta, Michael
    Hoff, Steven J.
    Zhao, David
    Gelijns, Annetine C.
    Szeto, Wilson Y.
    Weisz, Giora
    Argenziano, Michael
    Vassiliades, Thomas
    Liberman, Henry
    Matthai, William
    Ascheim, Deborah D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 68 (04) : 356 - 365
  • [8] Hybrid coronary revascularization vs. percutaneous coronary interventions for multivessel coronary artery disease
    Hannan, Edward L.
    Wu, Yi-Feng
    Cozzens, Kimberly
    Tamis-Holland, Jacqueline
    Ling, Frederick S. K.
    Jacobs, Alice K.
    Venditti, Ferdinand J.
    Berger, Peter B.
    Walford, Gary
    King, Spencer B., III
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) : 159 - 167
  • [9] Hybrid coronary revascularization vs. percutaneous coronary interventions for multivessel coronary artery disease
    Edward L.Hannan
    Yi-Feng WU
    Kimberly Cozzens
    Jacqueline Tamis-Holland
    Frederick S.K.Ling
    Alice K.Jacobs
    Ferdinand J.Venditti
    Peter B.Berger
    Gary Walford
    Spencer B.King
    [J]. Journal of Geriatric Cardiology, 2021, 18 (03) : 159 - 167
  • [10] Coronary artery revascularization in hemodialysis patients with multivessel coronary artery disease
    Hsu, Chan-Yang
    Chen, Yih-Sharng
    [J]. FORMOSAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 49 (02) : 45 - 48