Shared decision-making within goal-setting in rehabilitation: a mixed-methods study

被引:25
|
作者
Rose, Alice [1 ]
Soundy, Andy [1 ]
Rosewilliam, Sheeba [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
Shared decision-making; goal-setting; community rehabilitation; frail elders; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; COMMUNICATION BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1177/0269215518815251
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess the extent of shared decision-making within goal-setting meetings and explore patient-reported factors that influenced their participation to shared decision-making about their goals. Design: A two-phase explanatory sequential mixed-methods study, using questionnaires and interviews. Setting: A rehabilitation centre and patients' homes. Subjects: Frail elderly patients. Main Measures: Quantitative data were collected after every patient's goal-setting meeting using the Multifocal Approach to Sharing in Shared Decision Making (MAPPIN'SDM) questionnaire that assesses competencies relevant to shared decision-making. Shared decision-making was rated by an observer, patients and staff and compared. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews. Results: A total of 24 rehabilitation team members and 40 patients (mean age: 83 years) participated. All study participants felt that competency 7a (the language used by staff made sense to the patient) was observed in all meetings. Patients reported that for 22 of the meetings competency 4a, the advantages and disadvantages of rehabilitation, was not discussed. Games-Howell tests for direction of differences between groups showed significant difference (P = 0.001) between patients and staff in whether patients' problems were discussed. Nine patients' interviews suggested that motivation, self-confidence, family support, preparing themselves, getting information about goal-setting and rehabilitation options could enable them to participate in shared decision-making. They suggested that staff should communicate clearly and demonstrate that they are listening to patients but without a paternalistic approach. Conclusion: Staff exhibited most shared decision-making competencies at a good level. However, patients highlighted problems with information sharing and felt staff might not be listening to them. Research and practice should explore tools to address these shortfalls.
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 574
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] IMPLEMENTATION OF BEST PRACTICE GOAL-SETTING IN FIVE REHABILITATION SERVICES: A MIXED-METHODS EVALUATION STUDY
    Baker, Amanda
    Rehab, Masters Comm
    Cornwell, Petrea
    Gustafsson, Louise
    Stewart, Claire
    Lannin, Natasha A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2023, 55
  • [2] Shared decision-making in goal-setting: from clinical dietitians' and patients' perspectives
    Aladili, Lina
    McGreevy, Jenny
    Orrevall, Ylva
    Nydahl, Margaretha
    Bostrom, Anne-Marie
    Lovestam, Elin
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2023, 109 : 100 - 101
  • [3] A conversation approach based on shared goal-setting and shared decision-making for nurses in cancer aftercare: A developmental study
    Friesen, Jolanda H.
    Bours, Gerrie J. J. W.
    Snijders, Ingrid C. G.
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    Jie, Asiong G. K. S.
    Beurskens, Anna J. H. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (15)
  • [4] Multiethnic Perspectives of Shared Decision-Making in Hypertension: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Elias, Sabrina
    Wenzel, Jennifer
    Cooper, Lisa A.
    Perrin, Nancy
    Commodore-Mensah, Yvonne
    Lewis, Krystina B.
    Koirala, Binu
    Slone, Sarah
    Byiringiro, Samuel
    Marsteller, Jill
    Himmelfarb, Cheryl R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2024, 13 (14):
  • [5] A conversation approach based on shared goal-setting and shared decision-making for nurses in cancer aftercare: A developmental study
    Friesen-Storms, Jolanda H. H. M.
    Bours, Gerrie J. J. W.
    Snijders, Ingrid C. G.
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    Jie, Kon-Siong G.
    Beurskens, Anna J. H. M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2018, 35 : 107 - 116
  • [6] Acceptability and Feasibility of a Shared Decision-Making Model in Work Rehabilitation: A Mixed-Methods Study of Stakeholders’ Perspectives
    Marie-France Coutu
    France Légaré
    Marie-José Durand
    Dawn Stacey
    Marie-Elise Labrecque
    Marc Corbière
    Lesley Bainbridge
    [J]. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2019, 29 : 128 - 139
  • [7] Acceptability and Feasibility of a Shared Decision-Making Model in Work Rehabilitation: A Mixed-Methods Study of Stakeholders' Perspectives
    Coutu, Marie-France
    Legare, France
    Durand, Marie-Jose
    Stacey, Dawn
    Labrecque, Marie-Elise
    Corbiere, Marc
    Bainbridge, Lesley
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2019, 29 (01) : 128 - 139
  • [8] Shared decision making within goal setting in rehabilitation settings: A systematic review
    Rose, Alice
    Rosewilliam, Sheeba
    Soundy, Andrew
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2017, 100 (01) : 65 - 75
  • [9] Project Hero: A Goal-Setting and Healthy Decision-Making Program
    Borders, Mira Jane
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2009, 79 (05) : 239 - 243
  • [10] Shared decision-making in a medicalized birth environment: mixed-methods exploratory study, Cyprus
    Middleton, N.
    Koliandri, Ioanna
    Hadjigeorgiou, E.
    Christodoulides, V.
    Nicolaou, C.
    Kouta, C.
    Karanikola, M.
    Orphanides, I.
    Kolokotroni, O.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 33