A comparison of sedation with midazolam-ketamine versus propofol-fentanyl during endoscopy in children: a randomized trial

被引:26
|
作者
Akbulut, Ulas E. [1 ]
Saylan, Sedat [2 ]
Sengu, Bilal [2 ]
Akcali, Gulgun E. [2 ]
Erturk, Engin [3 ]
Cakir, Murat [4 ]
机构
[1] Kanuni Training & Res Hosp, Dept Pediat Gastroenterol Hepatol & Nutr, TR-61250 Trabzon, Turkey
[2] Kanuni Training & Res Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med, TR-61250 Trabzon, Turkey
[3] Karadeniz Tech Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Trabzon, Turkey
[4] Karadeniz Tech Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol & Nutr, Trabzon, Turkey
关键词
children; endoscopy; sedation; UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; TOTAL INTRAVENOUS ANESTHESIA; EMERGENCE AGITATION; DEEP SEDATION; SEVOFLURANE ANESTHESIA; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA; PROCEDURAL SEDATION; MODERATE SEDATION; GI ENDOSCOPY; COMBINATION;
D O I
10.1097/MEG.0000000000000751
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of midazolam plus ketamine versus fentanyl plus propofol combination administered to children undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) and to determine the most appropriate sedation protocol. Materials and methods This prospective, randomized, single-blind study included patients between the ages of 4 and 17 years who underwent UGE for diagnostic purposes. Patients were divided randomly into groups A (midazolam-ketamine combination, n = 119) and B (fentanyl plus propofol combination, n = 119). The effectiveness of the sedation and complications during the procedure and recovery period were recorded. Results The processes started without an additional dose of the drug for 118 patients (99.1%) in group A and for 101 patients (84.8%) in group B (P = 0.001). The average dose of ketamine administered to the patients in group A was 1.03 +/- 0.15 mg/kg and the average dose of propofol administered to the patients in group B was 1.46 +/- 0.55 mg/kg. None of the patients stopped the endoscopic procedure in group A, but one patient (0.8%) had to discontinue the endoscopic procedure in group B. 27 patients in group A (22.7%) and 41 patients (34.5%) in group B developed complications during the procedure (P = 0.044). The rate of complications during the recovery of group A (110 patients, 92.4%) was significantly higher than that in group B (48 patients, 40.3%) (P = 0.001). Conclusion In children, UGE procedures can be quite comfortable when using the midazolam-ketamine combination. However, adverse effects related to ketamine were observed during recovery. Copyright (C) 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 118
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Propofol-Fentanyl with Midazolam-Ketamine Combination in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Kidney Biopsy
    Azarfar, Anoush
    Ravanshad, Yalda
    Golsorkhi, Mohaddeseh
    Zahiri, Elnaz
    Fard, Mohamad Gharavi
    Akhondi, Mohsen
    Ghodsi, Alireza
    Ravanshad, Sahar
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2022, 16 (04) : 246 - 251
  • [2] Deep sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy: Propofol-fentanyl and midazolam-fentanyl regimens
    Lera dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo
    Maluf-Filho, Fauze
    Chaves, Dalton Marques
    Matuguma, Sergio Eiji
    Ide, Edson
    Luz, Gustavo de Oliveira
    de Souza, Thiago Ferreira
    Simoes Pessorrusso, Fernanda C.
    Hourneaux de Moura, Eduardo Guimaraes
    Sakai, Paulo
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (22) : 3439 - 3446
  • [3] Deep sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy: Propofol-fentanyl and midazolam-fentanyl regimens
    Marcos Eduardo Lera dos Santos
    Fauze Maluf-Filho
    Dalton Marques Chaves
    Sergio Eiji Matuguma
    Edson Ide
    Gustavo de Oliveira Luz
    Thiago Ferreira de Souza
    Fernanda C Simoes Pessorrusso
    Eduardo Guimares Hourneaux de Moura
    Paulo Sakai
    [J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2013, (22) : 3439 - 3446
  • [4] Propofol-ketamine vs propofol-fentanyl for sedation during pediatric upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
    Tosun, Zeynep
    Aksu, Recep
    Guler, Gulen
    Esmaoglu, Aliye
    Akin, Aynur
    Aslan, Duran
    Boyaci, Adem
    [J]. PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2007, 17 (10) : 983 - 988
  • [5] Deep Sedation Events During Diagnostic Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Randomized Study of the Regimens Propofol-Fentanyl and Midazolam-Fentanyl
    Lera Dos Santos, Marcos E.
    De Moura, Eduardo G.
    Sakai, Paulo
    Matuguma, Sergio E.
    Ide, Edson
    Chaves, Dalton M.
    Luz, Gustavo
    Souza, Thiago F.
    Pessorrusso, Fernanda C.
    Mestieri, Luiz H.
    Maluf-Filho, Fauze
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (04) : 367 - 367
  • [6] Oral Midazolam-Ketamine versus Midazolam alone for Procedural Sedation of Children Undergoing Computed Tomography; a Randomized Clinical Trial
    Majidinejad, Saeed
    Taherian, Keramat
    Esmailian, Mehrdad
    Khazaei, Mehdi
    Samaie, Vajihe
    [J]. EMERGENCY, 2015, 3 (02): : 64 - 69
  • [7] A Comparison of Patients' Satisfaction With Two Different Sedation Regimens for Endoscopy: Propofol, Midazolam and Fentanyl Versus Midazolam and Fentanyl
    Lachter, Jesse
    Elzam, Yaniv
    Gralnek, Ian M.
    Chermesh, Irit
    Eliakim, Rami
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 71 (05) : AB114 - AB115
  • [8] Regarding propofol-ketamine and propofol-fentanyl sedation technique
    Yoho, R
    [J]. DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 1999, 25 (12) : 974 - 974
  • [9] Propofol-fentanyl versus propofol-ketamine for procedural sedation and analgesia in patients with trauma
    Aminiahidashti, Hamed
    Shafiee, Sajad
    Hosseininejad, Seyed Mohammad
    Firouzian, Abulfazl
    Barzegarnejad, Ayyub
    Kiasari, Alieh Zamani
    Kerigh, Behzad Feizzadeh
    Bozorgi, Farzad
    Shafizad, Misagh
    Geraeeli, Ahmad
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 36 (10): : 1766 - 1770
  • [10] Sedation during upper GI endoscopy in cirrhotic outpatients: a randomized, controlled trial comparing propofol and fentanyl with midazolam and fentanyl
    Correia, Lucianna Motta
    Bonilha, Danielle Queiroz
    Gomes, Gustavo Flores
    Brito, Juliana Ramos
    Nakao, Frank Shigueo
    Lenz, Luciano
    Silveira Rohr, Maria Rachel
    Ferrari, Angelo P.
    Della Libera, Ermelindo
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 73 (01) : 45 - 51