Cost-effectiveness analysis of EGFR mutation testing and gefitinib as first-line therapy for non-small cell lung cancer

被引:40
|
作者
Narita, Yusuke [1 ]
Matsushima, Yukiko [1 ]
Shiroiwa, Takeru [2 ]
Chiba, Koji [3 ]
Nakanishi, Yoichi [4 ]
Kurokawa, Tatsuo [1 ]
Urushihara, Hisashi [1 ]
机构
[1] Keio Univ, Fac Pharm, Dept Drug Dev & Regulatory Sci, Tokyo 1058512, Japan
[2] Natl Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth & Welf Serv, Saitama, Japan
[3] Yokohama Univ Pharm, Lab Clin Pharmacol, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[4] Kyushu Univ, Fac Med Sci, Dept Clin Med, Chest Dis Res Inst, Fukuoka 812, Japan
关键词
Pharmacoeconomics; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Non-small cell lung cancer; Gefitinib; Individualized medicine; PHASE-III; OPEN-LABEL; CHEMOTHERAPY; ADENOCARCINOMA; GEMCITABINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.07.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: The combination use of gefitinib and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) testing is a standard first-line therapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we examined the cost-effectiveness of this approach in Japan. Materials and methods: Our analysis compared the 'EGFR testing strategy', in which EGFR mutation testing was performed before treatment and patients with EGFR mutations received gefitinib while those without mutations received standard chemotherapy, to the 'no-testing strategy,' in which genetic testing was not conducted and all patients were treated with standard chemotherapy. A three-state Markov model was constructed to predict expected costs and outcomes for each strategy. We included only direct medical costs from the healthcare payer's perspective. Outcomes in the model were based on those reported in the Iressa Pan-Asia Study (IPASS). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated using quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were conducted. Results: The incremental cost and effectiveness per patient of the 'EGFR testing strategy' compared to the 'no-testing strategy' was estimated to be approximately JPY122,000 (US$1180; US$1 = JPY104 as of February 2014) and 0.036 QALYs. The ICER was then calculated to be around JPY3.38 million (US$32,500) per QALY gained. These results suggest that the 'EGFR testing strategy' is cost-effective compared with the 'no-testing strategy' when JPY5.0 million to 6.0 million per QALY gained is considered an acceptable threshold. These results were supported by the sensitivity and scenario analyses. Conclusion: The combination use of gefitinib and EGFR testing can be considered a cost-effective first-line therapy compared to chemotherapy such as carboplatin paclitaxel for the treatment for NSCLC in Japan. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 77
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS OF GEFITINIB AND EGFR MUTATION TESTING AS THE FIRST-LINE TREATMENT FOR NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER IN VIETNAM
    Tran, T. T.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (05) : A112 - A112
  • [2] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF FIRST-LINE OSIMERTINIB IN PATIENTS WITH EGFR MUTATION-POSITIVE NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER
    Holleman, M. S.
    Al, M. J.
    Uyl-de Groot, C. A.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S3 - S3
  • [3] Cost-effectiveness analysis of EGFR mutation testing in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with gefitinib or carboplatin–paclitaxel
    Oscar Arrieta
    Pablo Anaya
    Vicente Morales-Oyarvide
    Laura Alejandra Ramírez-Tirado
    Ana C. Polanco
    [J]. The European Journal of Health Economics, 2016, 17 : 855 - 863
  • [4] Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab as First-Line Therapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Georgieva, M.
    Aguiar, P., Jr.
    Lima, J. P.
    Haaland, B.
    Lopes, G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 12 (11) : S2148 - S2149
  • [5] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF FIRST-LINE THERAPY FOR ADVANCED NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER (NSCLC)
    Yang, M. C.
    Tan, E. C. H.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (07) : A736 - A736
  • [6] Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab as first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    Georgieva, Mina
    da Silveira Nogueira Lima, Joao P.
    Aguiar, Pedro
    Lopes, Gilberto de Lima, Jr.
    Haaland, Benjamin
    [J]. LUNG CANCER, 2018, 124 : 248 - 254
  • [7] Cost-effectiveness of Osimertinib as First-line Treatment and Sequential Therapy for EGFR Mutation-positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in China
    Cai, Hongfu
    Zhang, Longfeng
    Li, Na
    Chen, Shen
    Zheng, Bin
    Yang, Jing
    Weng, Lizhu
    Liu, Mao-Bai
    [J]. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 41 (02) : 280 - 290
  • [8] Cost-effectiveness analysis of EGFR mutation testing in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel
    Arrieta, Oscar
    Anaya, Pablo
    Morales-Oyarvide, Vicente
    Alejandra Ramirez-Tirado, Laura
    Polanco, Ana C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2016, 17 (07): : 855 - 863
  • [9] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Dacomitinib versus Gefitinib in the First-Line Treatment of EGFR-Positive Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Zhang, Longfeng
    Li, Na
    Liu, Maobai
    Zheng, Bin
    Wu, Zhijuan
    Cai, Hongfu
    [J]. CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2021, 13 : 4263 - 4270
  • [10] OSIMERTINIB AS FIRST-LINE AND SECOND-LINE THERAPY FOR EGFR MUTATION-POSITIVE ADVANCED NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER: A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS IN CHINA
    Zhou, J.
    Jiang, G.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S54 - S54