Defining the Scope and Improving the Quality of Clinical Research Ethics Consultation: Response to Open Peer Commentaries About the National Collaborative

被引：9
|
作者：
Porter, Kathryn M. [1 ]
Danis, Marion [2 ]
Taylor, Holly A. [3 ]
Cho, Mildred K. [4 ]
Wilfond, Benjamin S. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Seattle Childrens Res Inst, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
[2] NCI, Ctr Clin, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源：
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS | 2018年 / 18卷 / 02期
基金：
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词：
D O I：
10.1080/15265161.2017.1413438
中图分类号：
B82 [伦理学（道德学）];
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：W13 / W15
页数：3
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Response to open peer commentaries on "Strangers at the Beachside: Research Ethics Consultation"
    Cho, Mildred K.
    Tobin, Sara L.
    Greely, Henry T.
    McCormick, Jennifer
    Boyce, Angie
    Magnus, David
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2008, 8 (03): : W4 - W6
  • [2] Response to open peer commentaries on "Ethics consultation in US hospitals: A national survey"
    Fox, Ellen
    Myers, Sarah
    Pearlman, Robert A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2007, 7 (02): : W1 - W3
  • [3] Broadening the Scope of Health Care Ethics Consultation: A Response to Open Peer Commentaries on Patient and Family Description of Ethical Concerns
    Danis, Marion
    Povar, Gail
    Cho, Hae Lin
    Grady, Christine
    Tarzian, Anita
    Mangal, Jed
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2020, 20 (06): : W6 - W8
  • [4] Response to Open Peer Commentaries "Taxonomizing Views of Clinical Ethics Expertise"
    Brummett, Abram
    Salter, Erica
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2020, 20 (01): : W5 - W9
  • [5] Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Ethics Consultation Quality Assessment Tool: A Novel Method for Assessing the Quality of Ethics Case Consultations Based on Written Records"
    Pearlman, Robert A.
    Foglia, Mary Beth
    Cohen, Jennifer H.
    Chanko, Barbara L.
    Berkowitz, Kenneth A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2016, 16 (03): : W1 - W2
  • [6] Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Ethics and Collateral Findings in Pragmatic Clinical Trials"
    Morain, Stephanie
    Mathews, Debra
    Bollinger, Juli Murphy
    Sugarman, Jeremy
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2020, 20 (01): : W10 - W11
  • [7] The Emergence of Clinical Research Ethics Consultation: Insights From a National Collaborative
    Porter, Kathryn M.
    Danis, Marion
    Taylor, Holly A.
    Cho, Mildred K.
    Wilfond, Benjamin S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2018, 18 (01): : 39 - 45
  • [8] Response to open peer commentaries on "Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants": Defining clinical utility and revisiting the role of relationships
    Ravitsky, Vardit
    Wilfond, Benjamin S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2006, 6 (06): : W10 - W12
  • [9] The Role of Patient Perspectives in Clinical Research Ethics and Policy: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Patient Perspectives on the Learning Health System"
    Kelley, Maureen
    James, Cyan
    Kraft, Stephanie Alessi
    Korngiebel, Diane
    Wijangco, Isabelle
    Joffe, Steven
    Cho, Mildred K.
    Wilfond, Benjamin
    Lee, Sandra Soo-Jin
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2016, 16 (02): : W7 - W9
  • [10] Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "What is The Best Standard for the Standard of Care in Clinical Research?"
    van der Graaf, Rieke
    van Delden, Johannes J. M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2009, 9 (6-7): : W7 - W8
12